Download
1 / 19
190 likes | 200 Views
This study examines the significance of local financial development in determining economic success, even in an integrated market. It analyzes the effects of financial development on business creation, competition, and growth. The findings highlight the importance of domestic financial institutions in a financially integrated world.
E N D
DOES LOCAL FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT MATTER?By Luigi GuisoPaola SapienzaLuigi Zingales Paulina Armacińska Ertem Ejder
Schedule • Introduction • Data Description • Indicators of Financial Development • Effects of financial development • Conclusions
Introduction • Financial development enhances theprobability an individual starts his ownbusiness, favors entry, increases competition, and promotes growth of firms. • Local financial development is an important determinant of the economic success ofan area even in an environment where there are no frictions to capital movements.
The effect of local financialdevelopment within a single country:Italy • Local financial development plays animportant roleeven in a perfectly integrated market. • Finance effects are not likely to disappear as theworld become more integrated or as Europe becomes unified.
Data Description 3 datasets are used: • Survey of Households Income and Wealth (SHIW) • “Il Sole 24 Ore” from Italian Statistical Institute (ISTAT) 3. Centrale dei Bilanci (CB)
Indicators of Financial Development • One of the main roles of the financial system is to transfer funds from agents with asurplus of resources to agents whose investment opportunities exceed their current resources. • The ease with which individuals in need of external funds can access them andthe premium they have to pay for these funds. • How more likely an individual is to obtain credit inone area of the country, rather than in a different one.(This indicator measures how easy it is foran individual to borrow at a local level.) • Importance of usury.
Does the Local Market Matter? • Distance is an important barrier to lending. • Distance may segment local markets. • If local market conditions matter, they should matter the most for small firms, which have difficulty in raisingfunds at a distance, than for large firms.
Effects of financial development on firms’ creations • Effects on the probability of starting a business - In more financially developed regions the probability a person becomes self-employed is higher. - Older people are more likely to start their own business and so are male.
Effects on the age at which people become entrepreneurs - More financially developed regions have younger entrepreneurs on average. - Moving from the least financially developed region to the most financially developed one decreases the averageage of entrepreneurs by 5.5 years.
Effects on the entry on new firms - If financial development increases the likelihood an individual start a business, it shouldalso increase the aggregate rate of firms’ formation andthe number of existing firms.
Effects on the competition in the local market - The entry of new firms and the degree ofcompetition is attributed to geographical clustering in industry specialization. - In case certain areas of the country are specialized in industries or segment ofindustries where the optimal firmsize is small then, in these areas we would observe more firms, more competition, and also moreentry, since barriers to entry are smaller when the optimal size of a firm is smaller.
Effects of financial development on firms’ growth • Local financial development has a positive effect on firm’s growth. Ceteris paribus, a firm located in the most financially developed regiongrows 6 percentage points faster than a firm located in the least financially developed region. • The effects of local financial development are limited to small firms. Large and established firms do not get any benefit from localfinancial development; in fact they are hurt,because it increases the competition at the local level.
Effects on aggregate growth • The level of financial development has a positive impact on growth. The effect is also economically sizeable.Moving from the least to the most financially developed region boosts the growth rate by 1.2 percentage point a year. • The entire difference in per capita income between Milan and Rome – about 50% - could be explained by the difference in their local levels of financial development.
Conclusions • Financial markets are becoming increasingly integrated throughout the world. Even in a country (Italy) that has been fully integrated (not only politically, but also in term ofregulation) for the last 140 years localfinancial development still matters. Therefore, domesticfinancial institutions are likely to remain important in a financially integrated Europe and, morebroadly, in a financially integrated world for time to come.
As Europe and the worldare becoming more integrated, large firms will becomeincreasingly uninterested of the conditionsof the local financial system, while small firms will continue to rely on it. • Depending on the initial size distribution of firms and the minimum threshold to access foreign capital markets,the political support in favor of domestic financial markets might vanish or strengthen as theworld becomes more financially integrated.
