1 / 37

Drug Information Resources Review

Drug Information Resources Review. Jennifer L. Rodis, PharmD, BCPS The Ohio State University College of Pharmacy October 25, 2011. Objectives. Review the differences between primary, secondary, and tertiary resources Discuss the value of each resources type

magdalen
Download Presentation

Drug Information Resources Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Drug Information Resources Review Jennifer L. Rodis, PharmD, BCPS The Ohio State University College of Pharmacy October 25, 2011

  2. Objectives • Review the differences between primary, secondary, and tertiary resources • Discuss the value of each resources type • Provide a refresher on searching Pubmed

  3. Types of Literature

  4. Types of literature • 3 main types of drug information literature • Tertiary • Interpretation of primary data • Secondary • No interpretation, just helps you find sources • Primary • Original research & analysis

  5. Real-life Research

  6. Tertiary Literature Summarizes and interprets the primary literature Information generally well accepted Place to start for basic information and guidance Can inform your subsequent research

  7. Tertiary Literature • Advantages • Convenient, accessible • Often available online • Review process of information is already done • Disadvantages • Lag time • Not as complete • Author’s interpretation

  8. Tertiary Literature Textbooks Electronic also Compendia Electronic also Full-text computer databases (Internet) Review articles

  9. Tertiary Resources – Drug Databases • Online • Lexi Comp CRL • MICROMEDEX • Drug Facts and Comparisons • MD Consult • AHFS Drug Information • Epocrates • Print • PDR (Physician’s Desk Reference)

  10. Tertiary Resources - Books • Print Books • Remington’s • Trissel’s (2 titles) • Handbook of Nonprescription Drugs • Redbook • Drugs in Pregnancy & Lactation (aka: Brigg’s) • Martindale: The Complete Drug Reference

  11. Tertiary Resources - Other • UpToDate • Pharmacist’s Letter • Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database • Ohio Administrative Code (pharmacy.ohio.gov) • FDA.gov (Orange Book, Drugs@FDA) • CDC.gov • Professional Organizations • APhA’s MTM Central • Package Insert • Manufacturer web sites

  12. Using Tertiary Literature • Does author have expertise? • Is the information current? • Is the information supported with citations? • Does the resource contain relevant information? • Is the resource free of bias or errors? • Is it clear/concise/easy-to-use?

  13. Secondary Literature Guides you to the primary and tertiary literature Indexing Bibliographic info only Abstracting Bibliographic citation plus brief summary of article or resource Almost all are electronic format

  14. Secondary Literature • Advantages • Simple search strategies • Very current citation information • Access point for tremendous amount of primary sources • Disadvantages • Understanding coverage of the database • Tweaking search strategies unique to each database

  15. Secondary Resources • ClinAlert • EMBASE (Elsevier) • International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA) • Iowa Drug Information System (IDIS) • Journal Watch • Lexis-Nexis • MEDLINE / PubMed

  16. Primary Literature Primary research Journal articles that are: Case reports Drug studies Original reports of data Meta-analysis? Unpublished studies

  17. Primary Literature Considerations • Evaluating the basics • Peer-reviewed • Journal reputation • Source of funding • Digging deeper • Study methodology • Clinical relevance • Patient populations

  18. Primary Literature • Advantages • Most current published source • Tremendous range of information • Personally assess utility/validity • Disadvantages • Overwhelming volume • Interpretation of results • Not yet vetted by experts

  19. Primary Literature Peer-reviewed journals JAMA New England Journal of Medicine American Journal of Health-system Pharmacy Annals of Internal Medicine Non-peer reviewed journals Supplements Pharmacy Today

  20. What’s the difference? Ease of Use Tertiary Secondary Primary

  21. What’s the difference? Most Current Primary Secondary Tertiary

  22. Alternate Sources of DI Internet, Listservs, and medical news briefs Local and national professional organizations and meetings Pharmaceutical manufacturers Drug information and poison control centers

  23. Searching Strategies • Begin broad, then narrow your search • Start with tertiary sources • Use “related articles” • Bibliographies • Secondary resource guides • Always be sure to assess most up to date information available • Primary sources

  24. Searching Pubmed

  25. Searching Strategies Develop focused question and break into parts What is the question asking? “Is peptic ulcer prevention with proton pump inhibitors and NSAIDs dose-related?” proton pump inhibitors, dose, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, prevention of peptic ulcer disease Other forms of the above words and phrases

  26. Searching Strategies • Putting together an answerable question is key to successful evidence-based medicine practice • Use PICO method • Patient or problem • Intervention • Comparative intervention • Outcome Be Specific!

  27. What is the minimum or maximum dose of NSAIDs at which proton-pump inhibitors are effective for peptic ulcer disease prophylaxis? Patient or problem Intervention Comparison Outcome Example: PICO

  28. Searching Strategies Read up on the basics of the question Start with tertiary resources for foundation Build on information gathered from texts, review articles, and drug databases with a primary literature search

  29. Searching Strategies • Gather as many articles as possible for all of the parts of the search • Use MeSH headings to help narrow or broaden your search • MeSH = Medical Subject Headings • Official indexing terms for MEDLINE

  30. Searching Databases: Basic Boolean “AND” Combines 2 terms (shrinks search) “OR” Gives database more choices (broadens search) “NOT” Limits search (removes undesired terms)

  31. Basic Boolean Both words must be present in results paroxetine AND suicide

  32. Basic Boolean Either word can be present in results paroxetine OR suicide

  33. Basic Boolean The first but not the second term will be present in the results paroxetine NOT suicide

  34. Pubmed Search Example What is the minimum or maximum dose of NSAIDs at which proton-pump inhibitors are effective for peptic ulcer disease prophylaxis?

  35. Search keywords • Proton pump inhibitors and dose and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents • proton pump inhibitors and dose and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents and prevention of peptic ulcer disease • MeSH term search: PPIs, NSAIDs, PUD http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19240698

  36. Adapted from lectures by Bridget Protus, PharmD, CGP, MLS delivered 1/2010. Thrower MR. Literature retrieval and Finding Resources Electronically. In: Felkey BG, Fox BI, Thrower MR. Health care informatics: a skills-based resource. Washington DC: American Pharmacists Association; 2005. p. 191-228. West, PM. Literature evaluation. In: Pharmacotherapy self-assessment program: science and practice of pharmacotherapy, 5th ed. (PSAP V). Kansas City: American College of Clinical Pharmacy; 2005. p. 93-110. Shields, KM. Drug information resources. In: Malone PM, Kier KL, Stanovich JE. Drug information: a guide for pharmacists, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2006. p.61-101. Resources

  37. Resources Thrower MR. Literature retrieval and Finding Resources Electronically. In: Felkey BG, Fox BI, Thrower MR. Health care informatics: a skills-based resource. Washington DC: American Pharmacists Association; 2005. p. 191-228. West, PM. Literature evaluation. In: Pharmacotherapy self-assessment program: science and practice of pharmacotherapy I, II, III. Kansas City: American College of Clinical Pharmacy; 2005. p. 93-5.

More Related