1 / 20

An EIC-like Polarized Electron Injector: Source, Beam & Polarimeter(s) Joe Grames Jefferson Lab

An EIC-like Polarized Electron Injector: Source, Beam & Polarimeter(s) Joe Grames Jefferson Lab August 23, 2007. Challenging e- Source Requirements. High Electron Polarization > 80 % High Current ~ 1 mA for JLab ELIC ~ 25 (250) mA for BNL eRHIC ~ Surface Charge Limit

magnar
Download Presentation

An EIC-like Polarized Electron Injector: Source, Beam & Polarimeter(s) Joe Grames Jefferson Lab

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. An EIC-like Polarized Electron Injector: Source, Beam & Polarimeter(s) Joe Grames Jefferson Lab August 23, 2007

  2. Challenging e- Source Requirements High Electron Polarization > 80 % High Current ~ 1 mA for JLab ELIC ~ 25 (250) mA for BNL eRHIC ~ Surface Charge Limit Sustainable Photocathode (QE ~1%) 2.5 mA => 210 C/day (~ state of the art lifetime) 25 mA => 2.1 kC/day (~ represents significant effort) 250 mA => 21 kC/day (~ ?) Laser Heating (6 mA/Watt/%) photocathode cooling becomes necessary I > ~few mA? photocathode lifetime => laser “headroom” necessary (~10x)

  3. GaAs Photocathodes: last 30 years… 100 nm 100 nm 2 FOM  I P Superlattice GaAs: Layers of GaAs on GaAsP Strained GaAs: GaAs on GaAsP Bulk GaAs 14 pairs “conventional” material QE ~ 0.2% Pol ~ 75% @ 850 nm No strain relaxation QE ~ 0.8% Pol ~ 85% @ 780 nm High QE ~ 8% Pol ~ 35% @ 780 nm

  4. 2 2 P I P I sup. = 1.38 str. 85% Polarization No depolarization over time! Routinely Achieve Stable Polarization ~ 85% Experiment Figure of Merit • QE reduced by 2x, but polarization constant • One sample used from Sept ‘05 through Apr ‘07 • 7 activations, ~ 1000 C extracted, I ~ 200uA • Max QE: 0.7 to 0.4%, P ~ constant at 85%

  5. New Fiber Technology Based Drive Laser Ti-Sap Diode J. Hansknecht and M. Poelker, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 9, 063501 (2006) • Gain-switching better than modelocking; no phase lock problems • Very high power • Telecom industry spurs growth, ensures availability • Useful because of superlattice photocathode (requires 780nm)

  6. Compact, Off-The Shelf, Rack Mountable… RF locked low-power 1560 nm fiber diode High power 1560 nm fiber amplifier Non-linear frequency doubling converter for 1560 nm to 780 nm

  7. New CEBAF “load-lock” gun Preparation/activation chamber Goal: 8 hours swap photocathode Present: ~12 hours HV chamber Loading chamber x4 “suitcase” Vent/bake gun

  8. 304SS without (blue) and with (red) electroplishing and vacuum firing Improvements to Gun Vacuum NEG coating (Ti/Zr/V) 100 hrs @ 70 C 200 L/sec 304 SS: Electropolished & Vacuum Fired (AVS: 3 hrs @ 900 C @ 3x10-6 T)

  9. Bulk GaAs, Green light and DC beam NEW OLD Comparing NEW & OLD load locked guns Vacuum gauges indicated same pressure in both guns, Suggesting gauges don’t work below 1.5x10-11Torr “Further Measurements of Photocathode Operational Lifetime at Beam Current > 1mA using an Improved 100 kV DC High VoltageGaAs Photogun,” J. Grames, et al., Proceedings Polarized Electron Source Workshop, SPIN06, Tokyo, Japan

  10. 1 mA from a High Polarization Photocathode* * Electron polarization not measured High Initial QE • Vacuum signals • Laser Power • Beam Current

  11. Superlattice GaAs: Layers of GaAs on GaAsP Fiber-based Laser 100 nm 14 pairs chekc No strain relaxation QE ~ 0.8% Pol ~ 85% @ 780 nm An EIC-like Polarized e- Source Good gun Good Photocathode Good Laser

  12. -1 N= ·(Pb·Pt·A) 2 2 dPb Pb An EIC-like Injector Polarimeter • What are desirable (necessary) features of electron polarimeters? • Large total analyzing power • High luminosity to rapidly achieve small statistical uncertainty • Non-invasive continuous measurement does not disrupt experiment • Designs with reduced sensitivity to major systematics e = Pbeam· Ptarget· Atotal analyzing power

  13. k k´ 1+ S(q)Pb· s(q,f) = s0(q) | k k´| Sherman Phys.Rev. 103(6) 1956, p1601-7 Mott Scattering Spin-orbit coupling of the beam electron and the target nucleus. • Target thickness effects • Dilution by multiple/plural scattering • Sherman function sets scale • Target thickness extrapolation necessary • MeV double-scattering is important (-) Atot

  14. Mott at Higher (MeV) Energy • High cross-section of low energy (<1 MeV) Mott polarimeters is problematic: • Significant plural and multiple scattering => reduces effective analyzing power • Beam current limited to nanoamps • High energy Mott scattering (MAMI, 1994) • J. Sromicki demonstrated Mott scattering experiments from lead at 14 MeV • J. Sromicki, Phys.Rev.Let. 81(1), 1999, p.57-60 • Reduced cross-section => mA currents are tolerated and dilution of the analyzing power is suppressed => sensitivity to target thickness is similarly reduced • Uncertainty of Sherman function • Coulomb screening at lower energy • Ross et.al Phys.Rev A 38(12) 1988, p6055-8 • Finite nuclear size at higher energy • Ugincius et. al Nucl.Phys. A158 1970, p418-32 • 20% effect at 14 MeV • 1.5% effect at 5 MeV

  15. Pb ~ 70% Atot ~ 40% Target: 1mm Au N+ - N- e = Atot· Pb = N+ + N- JLab 5 MeV Mott Polarimeter • Jlab 5 MeV Polarimeter • Jlab built a 5 MeV Mott polarimeter (typ. 1mm Au foil and 2 mA beam current) • J.S. Price et al., Pol. Gas Targets and Pol. Beams 7th Int’l. Workshop, Urbana, IL 1997 • Inelastic background discrimination was the largest problem • HAPPEX used injector Mott results with ~5% uncertainity

  16. Reducing Mott Systematics • Late 90’s M. Steigerwald joined the source group from MAMI • Dramatic improvement eliminating background signal by means of collimation, shielding, time of flight, and coincidence methods • Mott studied over range of 2-8 MeV with Au, Ag, Cu foils. • Results presented at Spin 2000; M. Steigerwald, 14th International Spin Physics Symposium 500Å Gold

  17. Effective Analyzing Power Collaboration with Horowitz at Indiana Univ. for Sherman function calculations (dominant contribution of total uncertainty about 1%) Applied double-scattering model to describe dilution of AP in targets of finite thickness. PRL describing analysis, model of double scattering, and results of 1.1% total measurement was drafted, but not published.

  18. 5 MeV 100 keV or 500 keV New, July 2007 Mott @ 20 keV, 100 keV, 500 keV & 5 MeV 20 kV “mini”-Mott will mate to new Load Lock Gun

  19. First polarized beam from GaAs photogun GaAs Photoguns @ Higher Average Current JLab Load Lock Cornell/JLab (construction) JLab FEL program with unpolarized beam eRHIC ELIC (LL demo) Ave. Beam Current (mA) Qweak (2009) Year First low polarization, then high polarization at CEBAF

  20. Conclusions • EIC-like Electron Source • Great progress, but work still to be done… • 10-100x increase in superlattice lifetime • laser cooling for 1 … 10 …100 mA sources • gun technology for Vacuum or HV (e.g., 200 kV gun) • surface charge limit (working with vendor) • EIC-like Injector Polarimeter • ~MeV Mott can be a “1%”-ish polarimeter • limiting uncertainty is Sherman function • invasive, yet rapid • useful for the e- source scientist • useful for polarimeter cross-comparisons

More Related