1 / 18

CIS Working Group 2.2 HMWB Guidance Document on Identification and Designation

CIS Working Group 2.2 HMWB Guidance Document on Identification and Designation of Heavily Modified and Artificial Water Bodies 13. September 2002. Progress to Date (1). The project plan for working group 2.2 was to: 1. produce draft guidance papers

mahlah
Download Presentation

CIS Working Group 2.2 HMWB Guidance Document on Identification and Designation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CIS Working Group 2.2 HMWBGuidance Document on Identification and Designation of Heavily Modified and Artificial Water Bodies13. September 2002

  2. Progress to Date (1) The project plan for working group 2.2 was to: 1. produce draft guidance papers 2. test this guidance by undertaking case studies 3. produce a synthesis of case study experience 4. review the guidance

  3. Progress to Date (2) => 12 Guidance Papers were produced until Dec. 2001 => 33 Case Studies have been undertaken by 11 States with having reported by July 2002 (web site: www.sepa.org.uk/casestudies) • 1st draft of the Synthesis Report has been circulated for comment in April 2002 (summary is provided) – final version will be available in early 2003 • Final draft Guidance Document and Policy Summary are available upon CIRCA • 1st draft toolbox was produced by June 2002 – final version will be available in December 2002

  4. Development of Guidance • 1st draft guidance was produced in mid May • Conference in Berlin on 30/31 May included 13 MS, Norway, 3 Accession States, stakeholders, representa- tives from IMPRESS/WATECO/INTERCAL/REF- COND/MONITORING, contractors of the case studies - Eight 3hr workshop sessions reviewed the guidance • 2nd draft guidance distributed in mid June was dis- cussed at the 4th HMWB Working Group meeting on 18/19 June in Brussels • 3rd draft guid. distributed by 2nd Aug. for comments • Final guidance and policy paper (13. September 2002)

  5. Artikel 4 (3) Identification and Designation of Artificial and Heavily Modified Water Bodies

  6. Definition of ”Artificial Water Body” WFD Article 2 (8) • "Artificial water body“ means a body of surface water created by human activity.

  7. What means „created by human activity“ ? An AWB means a surface water body => which has been created in a location where no water body existed before and => which has not been created by the direct physical modification or movement or realignment of an existing water body Note ! MS have the option to identify such WB as AWB or to identify them as natural WB !

  8. AWB Definition of the GD - Examples - All WB created by man are „artificial“ e.g. => canals constructed for navigation => drainage chanals for irrigation => man-made ponds and dug ponds => harbours and docks => dredging pools, surface mining lakes => storage reservoirs for hydropower use

  9. Artikel 4 (3) Identification and Designation of Artificial and Heavily Modified Water Bodies

  10. Definition of ”Heavily Modified Water Body” WFD Article 2 (9) "Heavily modified water body" means a body of surface water which as a result of physical alterations by human activity is substantially changed in character, as designated by the Member State in accordance with the provisions of Annex II.

  11. UsesPhysical alterations Navi-gation Flood pro-tection Hydro-power Agric.Fores. Water supply Urbani-sation Dams & weirs Channel maintenance, dredging, removal of material Shipping channels Channelisation, straightening Bank reinforcement, fixation, embankments Land drainage Land claim Creation of back waters through embankments Overview of the main physical alterations Recre-ation x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

  12. UsesImpacts Navi-gation Flood pro-tection Hydro-power Agric.Fores. Water supply Urbani-sation Disruption in river continuum & sediment transport x x x x Change in river profile x x x x Detachment of ox-bow lakes/wetlands x x x x x Restriction/Loss of flood plains x x x Low/reduced flow x x Direct mechanical damage to fauna/flora x x Artificial discharge regime x Change in groundwater level Soil erosion/silting x x x Main impacts upon hydromorphology and biology Recre-ation x x x x x x x x x x x x x

  13. River Rhein at Breisach: Loss of structural diversity caused by channelisation, straightening etc. * 1828 (nearly) natural status * 1872 flood protection measures have been taken (Tulla) * 1963 after further channelisation

  14. Artikel 4 (3) Identification and Designation of Artificial and Heavily Modified Water Bodies

  15. Artikel 4 (3) Identification and Designation of Artificial and Heavily Modified Water Bodies

  16. Establishment of MEP • Step 10.1: Choose quality elements for MEP based on comparable water category • Step 10.2: Establish MEP hydromorphological condi- tions, applying all mitigation measures which do not have significant adverse effects on the uses or the wider environment • Step 10.3: Establish MEP physico-chemical conditions based on comparable water type and results of step 10.2 • Step 10.4: Establish MEP biological conditions based on comparable water type and results of Steps 10.2 and 10.3

  17. Establishment of GEP • Step 11.1: The establishment of GEP is principally based on the biological quality elements • Step 11.2: The hydromorphological conditions must be such as to support the achievment of the GEP biological values • Step 11.3: The values for the general physico-chemical quality elements should be used as defined by REFCOND and COAST • Step 11.4: GEP requires compliance with the EQS for specific synthetic and non-synthetic pollutants The setting of class boundaries for natural waters and AWB/HMWB should be comparable – there is no need for a specific approach for AWB/HMWB

  18. Future Development 1. Presumably a need exists for a focal point dealing withthe future AWB/HMWB activities - facilitate contacts in and between the MS, make information available concerning the understanding of the GD and case study results 2. An information exchange mechanism is needed for the exchange of gathered experiences in the application of the GD; therefore from time to time meetings or work- shops should be organised to facilitate the exchange of experiences concerning the future AWB/HMWB work 3. In the context of the application and harmonisation of the links of all GD, a cluster of the WG 2.1, 2.2, 2.9 and4.1 might be appropriate

More Related