160 likes | 298 Views
Why is this important?. More with the same or lessManagers want $ for programs not evaluationsManagers do not speak evaluationeseFor groups with many programs there needs to be standardization.. Logic Model for the Template. . . Inputs. . Funding, mandate, charge. . . . . . . Activities. Outputs
E N D
1. Herbert M. Baum, Ph.D.
Teresa G. Campbell, Ph.D.
REDA International, Inc.
EERS Meeting, May 3, 2011
A New Program Review Template to Facilitate Effective Program Management
2. Why is this important? More with the same or less
Managers want $ for programs not evaluations
Managers do not speak evaluationese
For groups with many programs there needs to be standardization.
3. Logic Model for the Template
4. Contextual Factors History
Funding
Personnel issues
5. Evaluation Questions What are the major outcomes that the program is trying to achieve and why?
What are the contextual factors impacting the achievement of the outcomes?
For each outcome, what is the metric and how has it changed over time?
What is the quality of the data being gathered?
6. Template I. Background
II. Funding
III. Quantitative Assessment
IV. Qualitative Assessment
V. Summary
7. I. Background Program specifics
Brief history of the program
What is the mission of the program ?
What are the activities of the program ?
How does the director and staff see these as relating to the mission?
8. I. Background(Continued) What are the major outcomes that are the focus of this review?
How does each relate to the mission or purpose of a grant?
Who is the target of the outcomes?
How do the activities support achieving those outcomes?
How might the history of the program help or hinder achieving the outcomes?
Are there any concerns about the information presented in this section?
9. Example Program Specifics
Geriatric Education Program
Primary contact
Phone number
XXXXX@HRSA.gov
Brief History
What do they do?
10. Example (Continued) Outcomes
1. Improvement in training
2. Development and dissemination of curricula
3. Support for training/retraining
4. Support of continuing education
5. Clinical training
6. Evaluation of training
7. Placement
11. Outcome Data
12. Outcome Data
13. Completing the review Funding
Complete presentation of quantitative data
Present qualitative data and success stories
Summarize findings and make recommendations
14. Summary
Handy tool for evaluators to use and open a dialogue
Make a program review less threatening to program managers.
Create more utilization-focused evaluations
15. Questions Thank you
Questions
Contact information
HBaum@REDAInternational.com
301-996-7332
TCampbell@REDAInternational.com