420 likes | 609 Views
Categories Of Behavior. IVAN PAVLOV. CLASSICAL CONDITIONING. Context of embarrassing situation ->blushing Odor of food that once made you sick ->nausea Sight of parent while raiding cookie jar ->fear. Thorndike’s Puzzle Box. B.F. Skinner 1904-1990. Pigeon in Operant Chamber.
E N D
CLASSICAL CONDITIONING • Context of embarrassing situation ->blushing • Odor of food that once made you sick ->nausea • Sight of parent while raiding cookie jar ->fear
Instrumental Conditioning • Doing chores -> money • Doing chores -> praise • Telling a lie to avoid blame -> avoidance • Putting on a coat to remove -> removal chill • Getting a speeding ticket -> punishment
Basic Conditioning Procedures • Instrumental conditioning • Type R conditioning • Operant conditioning • Trial and Error Learning Pavlovian Conditioning • Type S Conditioning • Respondent Conditioning
LAW OF EFFECT • Thorndike: Responses that are followed by pleasurable effect is stamped in; responses followed by unpleasurable (painful events) are stamped out. • Skinner: Rate of emitting responses that are followed by a positive reinforcer is increased; by a negative reinforcer is decreased. • Thorndike: Responses trained by trial and error. • Skinner: Responses shaped by method of successive approximation.
TYPES OF REINFORCERS Positive • primary [S+R] food, drink, odors • secondary [S+r] approval, money Negative • Primary [S-R] loud noise, shock, bright light • Secondary [S-r] angry look, bad grade, fine
INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING (Type R) • 2-term contingency: • response -> reinforcement • R -> SR • (bar press) -> (food) • Nature of reinforcer can vary: • Positive - S+R, S+r • Negative - S-R, S-r • Primary - S+R, S-R • Secondary - S+r, S-r
CONTINGENCIES OF REINFORCEMENT: R-> S+R Reward training (primary reinforcement) R-> S-R Punishment (primary reinforcement) R-> S+r Positive secondary reinforcement R-> S-r Negative secondary reinforcement R removes S-R Escape training R postpones S-R Avoidance training R -> SR Omission training
Two-term contingency is typically “occasioned” by a discriminative stimulus (SD) • SD: R -> SR • light: bar press -> food • no light: bar press -> no food • Nature of discrimative stimuli can vary: • exteroceptive • proprioceptive • interoceptive
FUNCTIONS OF A STIMULUS: Eliciting (US->UR, C->CR) Reinforcing (S+R, S-R, S+r, S-r) Discriminative (SD: R->SR; S : R SR)
Discriminative Operant: • SD: R SR • S : R SR
Types Of Discriminative Stimuli • Exteroceptive: Stimuli generated by sensory organs. • Proprioceptive: Stimuli generated by muscles and tendons, e.g., doing something by “feel” - knowing where you are in the dark • Interoceptive: Stimuli generated by internal organs; that are innervated by the autonomic nervous system.
D r/D r/D r/D R Skinner’s Theory of Chaining turn approach seize press Sn-3:Rn-3 Sn-2:Rn-2 Sn-1:Rn-1 Sn:RnS
Schedules Of Reinforcement • Number (Ratio) • n responses SR • Time (Interval) • First response after t seconds SR
Basic Schedules: • Fixed Ratio (FR) • Variable Ratio (VR) • Fixed Interval (FI) • Variable Interval (VI)
Cumulative Record no responses constant rate accelerating
Skinner’s “Theory” Of Instrumental Conditioning • Two-term contingency: R SR • Nature of reinforcer can vary: R S [S+R, Sr, S-R, S-r]. • 3-term contingency (Discriminative operant) SD : R SR (light: bar press food) S : R SR (no light: bar press food) • Chaining of discriminative operants: • Nature of discriminative stimulus can vary: exteroceptive interoceptive proprioceptive D r/D r/D r/D R Sn-3:Rn-3 Sn-2:Rn-2 Sn-1:Rn-1 Sn:RnS
Skinner’s “Theory”(cont.) • Contingency of reinforcement can vary: R S±R(r) • Schedule of reinforcement can vary: Rn/t S±R • subject must emit nresponses within a particular time frame t. • Verbal Behavior. Behavior that is reinforced by a member of one’s verbal community. • Private events. Discriminative responding to proprioceptive or interoceptive stimuli (stimuli under our skin). Sd : r Sr or Sd : r Sr.
Pascal:“The heart has reason that reason will never know.” Descartes: “I think, therefore I am.”
Skinner [& Freud (& Terrace)] On Consciousness • Consciousness is a proper subject matter for psychology but it is not an explanation of behavior. It is what has to be explained (e.g., Tom hit Bill because Tom felt angry). • Why did Tom feel angry? • How did Tom know he was angry? • Consciousness vs. Awareness: • Animals are aware of objects (but only fleetingly). • Humans are conscious of objects (because they can name them).
Skinner [& Freud (& Terrace)] on Consciousness (Con’t.) • Consciousness develops because it enhances the social fabric of the verbal community. It provides us with a sense of “other minds”, another person’s hunger, pain, fear, rage, sadness, truthfulness, etc. In this sense, consciousness is adaptive. • Internal states are inferred by adult (“You seem hungry.”) • Feedback about private events is not as precise as feedback for tacting public events. • Discriminative control of inner states (tacting) becomes autonomous with experience.
Verbal Behavior • Verbal Behavior. Behavior that is reinforced by a member of one’s verbal community. • Mands (“demands”), a 2-term contingency: verbal response SR [”baba” bottle] • Tacts - [tactus (Latin, “to point”)], a 3-term contingency: -SD: verbal response Sr [Sight of Tom’s apple]: Mary: “May I please have an apple?” Tom gives Mary an apple.]
Verbal Behavior (con’t.) Examples of discriminative control of verbal behavior: • echoic behavior: *Mother says [“dog”]: “dog” “good” • textual behavior: *Printed word [dog]: “dog” “good” • transcription: *Write the word [d-o-g]: d-o-g “good” • intraverbal responses: *Printed word [c-h-I-e-n]: “dog” “bien” *“How are you?”: “Fine thanks” “good” *Printed letters [Na]: “sodium” “good” *“3 x 3”: “9” “good”