600 likes | 713 Views
Dynamic Networks, Influence Systems, and Renormalization. Bernard Chazelle. Princeton University. Interacting particles, each one with its own physical laws !. Hegselmann -Krause systems. authoritarian. left. right. libertarian. authoritarian. left. right. libertarian.
E N D
Dynamic Networks, Influence Systems, and Renormalization Bernard Chazelle Princeton University
Interacting particles, each one with its own physical laws !
authoritarian left right libertarian
authoritarian left right libertarian
authoritarian left right libertarian
authoritarian left right libertarian
Each agent chooses weights and moves to weighted mass center of neighbors
Communication rules network Dynamical rules here, averaging
Communication rules network Eliminate quantifiers (Tarski-Collins)
Interacting particles, each with its own communication laws!
Dynamical rules ( must respect network) eg, Ising model, swarm systems, voter model
Influence systems Very general !
Diffusive Influence systems deterministic convexity
Dynamical system in high dimension stochastic matrix Dynamic network associated with P (x)
What if all the matrices are the same? fixed-point attractors or limit cycles
Theory of diffusive influence systems Theory of Markov chains
Results Diffusive influence systems can be chaotic All Lyapunov exponents are
Results Diffusive influence systems can be chaotic Random perturbation leads to a limit cycle almost surely Phase transitions form a Cantor set Predicting long-range behavior is undecidable
Bounding the topological entropy via algorithmicrenormalization
Grammar Language