1 / 16

Taxation of International Artistes and Community Law

Taxation of International Artistes and Community Law. European Commission franco.roccatagliata@ec.europa.eu ”Seminar on social security and taxation in the context of mobility in the live performance sector”. Questions for the Panel on « International Artiste Taxation ».

mairi
Download Presentation

Taxation of International Artistes and Community Law

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Taxation of International Artistes and Community Law European Commission franco.roccatagliata@ec.europa.eu ”Seminar on social security and taxation in the context of mobility in the live performance sector” Brussels, 10 November 2009

  2. Questions for the Panel on « International Artiste Taxation » 1) What is changing after the ECJ case rulings (Gerritse – 2003, Scorpio – 2006) for artist taxation? 2) What’s the situation across Europe? 3) What has improved for the live performance sector and which areas are still a problem? 4) How can Europe respond better to the principles of freedom of movement of persons and services? Brussels, 10 November 2009

  3. What « Europe » can do (and/or is doing) to remove fiscal obstacles for artistes using the Internal Market’s freedoms? OUTLINE • EC Law and Taxation: General Remarks on the limits of the “positive integration” • The EC Treaty Freedoms and the “negativeintegration” • The EU Cross-border Citizens and Their Rights Brussels, 10 November 2009

  4. 1. EC Law and TaxationGeneral Remarks The limits of the positive EC action/integration A. Legal Constraints : (1) Legal basis: Direct Taxation is only indirectly taken in account by the EC Treaty • Art. 93 ECT «The Council shall … adopt provisions for the harmonisation of legislation concerning turnover taxes, excise duties and other forms of indirect taxation … » • Art.94 ECT « The Council shall … issue directives for the approximation of such laws, regulations or administrative provisions of the Member States as directly affect the establishment or functioning of the common market. » Brussels, 10 November 2009

  5. 1. EC Law and TaxationGeneral Remarks The limits of the positive EC action/integration A. Legal Constraints : (2)Double Taxation: Article 293 ECT does not oblige Member States to eliminate double taxation Art. 293 ECT « Member States shall, so far as is necessary, enter into negotiations with each other with a view to securing for the benefit of their nationals … the abolition of double taxation within the Community …» “Article [293] is not intended to lay down a legal rule directly applicable as such, but merely defines a number of matters on which the Member States are to enter into negotiations with each other ’ far as is necessary’. … it is clear from the wording of that provision that it cannot itself confer on individuals any rights on which they might be able to rely before their national courts.” (ECJ, C-14/96, Gilly, para. 14-17) Brussels, 10 November 2009

  6. 1. EC Law and TaxationGeneral Remarks The limits of the positive EC action/integration B. Political/Legal Constraints : (1) The need for unanimity among European Union members over tax matters. Article 94 ECT « The Council shall, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, issue directives for the approximation of laws … . » Brussels, 10 November 2009

  7. 1. EC Law and TaxationGeneral Remarks The limits of the positive EC action/integration B. Political/Legal Constraints : (2)Fiscal sovereignty of MSs (subsidiarity). Article 5 ECT « In areas which do not fall within its exclusive competence, the Community shall take action, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, only if and in so far as the objectives of the proposed action cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States … ». • “ … as Community law stands at present, direct taxation does not as such fall within the purview of the Community …”ECJ, C-279/93, Schumacker, para.21; C-290/04, Scorpio, 30) • “ … direct taxation falls within the competence of the Member States … “ (ECJ, C-345/04, Centro Equestre, para 19) Brussels, 10 November 2009

  8. 2.The EC Treaty Freedoms The negative integration • the role of the ECJ Member States remain competent to determine the criteria for taxation, however their tax provisions must be compatible with EC Law. “ … the powers retained by the Member States must nevertheless be exercised consistently with Community law” ( ECJ, C-279/93, Schumacker, para.21; C-290/04, Scorpio, 30 ) Brussels, 10 November 2009

  9. 2.The EC Treaty Freedoms Tax Treaties are not an exception to the rule. Like other tax provisions, tax conventions must not contravene the requirements of EC law “ Irrespective of its extent,the difference in tax treatment resulting from the application of that [tax] convention … constitutes discrimination … which is incompatible with the freedom of establishment guaranteed by the Treaty ” ( ECJ, C-170/05, Denkavit France, para.49 ) Brussels, 10 November 2009

  10. 2.The EC Treaty Freedoms Member States may take their inspiration from OECD Model (e.g. Article 17 on taxation of artistes) but their provisions are not necessarily compatible with EC Law “ …the fact that the rules are consistent with the provisions of the OECD model convention does not also mean that they comply with Article 43 EC. Neither the provisions nor the objectives of the OECD model convention, on the one hand, or of the EC Treaty, on the other, are in fact the same.” ( A.G. Micho, C-324/00, Lankhorst-Hohorst, para.79 ) Brussels, 10 November 2009

  11. 3. The EU Cross-border Citizens and Their Rights • The role of the European Commission • as policy maker: • the “coordination” of national tax policies (to transform the “negative integration” into a positive, constructive action) • as “guardian of the Treaty” (Art. 211 ECT) • the infringement procedures (main aim of an infringement action is to remedy breach of Community law) No direct access for tax payer to the ECJ • Art. 226 ECT: Infringement procedure (Commission) • Art. 234 ECT: Preliminary ruling (national courts) Brussels, 10 November 2009

  12. Direct tax cases decided by/pending before the ECJ (by year of reference to the Court; 31/12/2008) Brussels, 10 November 2009

  13. 3. The EU Cross-border Citizens and Their Rights Direct taxation: new infringements per year(31/12/07) Year Complaints Own initiative Total 2001 17 1 18 2002 34 5 39 2003 28 10 38 2004 (EU 25) 35 2 37 2005 47 23 70 2006 50 16 66 2007 (EU 27) 65 32 97 Brussels, 10 November 2009

  14. 3. The EU Cross-border Citizens and Their Rights Complaints about the taxation of non-resident • 1) Different collection mechanism • 2) Different tax base (gross versus net) • 3) Different tax rates For press releases in respect of infringement cases : http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/common/infringements/infringement_cases/index_en.htm (See, e.g.: IP/09/292; IP/09/291; IP/08/1533; IP/08/144 …) Brussels, 10 November 2009

  15. 3. The EU Cross-border Citizens and Their Rights Complaints – Who and how? • Anyone, free of charge • Against any measure or practice by a Member State incompatible with EU law • Complainant does not have to: • demonstrate a formal interest or • be directly concerned by the alleged infringement • Complainants are not a party to the infringement proceedings; they must safeguard their rights at national level • In writing, by letter, fax or e-mail (any EU language) For more information: EC Infringement-Website: http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/infringements/infringements_en.htm Brussels, 10 November 2009

  16. Thank You For Your Attention !! Arnoud Gerritse &the free movement of musical notes(Source: http://eddywestveer.blogspot.com) Brussels, 10 November 2009

More Related