480 likes | 625 Views
Efficient Visualization of Lagrangian Coherent Structures by Filtered AMR Ridge Extraction. October 2007 - IEEE Vis Filip Sadlo, Ronald Peikert @ CGL - ETH Zurich. Lagrangian Coherent Structures (LCS). FTLE. Shadden et al. 2005. Vector Field Topology Crit. pts. & streamlines
E N D
Efficient Visualization ofLagrangian Coherent Structures by Filtered AMR Ridge Extraction October 2007 - IEEE Vis Filip Sadlo, Ronald Peikert @ CGL - ETH Zurich
Lagrangian Coherent Structures (LCS) FTLE Shadden et al. 2005 Vector Field Topology • Crit. pts. & streamlines • Instantaneous view • Fast Lagr. Coherent Structures • Ridges in Lyapunov Exponent • Transient view • Slow (trajectory per point & time) -> Adaptive approach Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Lagrangian Coherent Structures (LCS) FTLE Shadden et al. 2005 Vector Field Topology • Crit. pts. & streamlines • Instantaneous view • Fast Lagr. Coherent Structures • Ridges in Lyapunov Exponent • Transient view • Slow (trajectory per point & time) -> Adaptive approach Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Finite-Time Lyapunov Exponent (FTLE) FTLE: “growth of perturbation after advection time T” Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
FTLE Computation • Advection of particle pairs: tedious • Haller 2001: by pre-sampled flow map f t0= FTLE Shadden et al. 2005 Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
FTLE Computation • Advection of particle pairs: tedious • Haller 2001: by pre-sampled flow map f t0= FTLE Shadden et al. 2005 Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
FTLE Computation • Advection of particle pairs: tedious • Haller 2001: by pre-sampled flow map f t0= FTLE Shadden et al. 2005 Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
FTLE Computation • Advection of particle pairs: tedious • Haller 2001: by pre-sampled flow map f t0= FTLE Shadden et al. 2005 Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
LCS in Nature from: www.publicaffairs.water.ca.gov/swp/swptoday.cfm from: www.scienceclarified.com/Ga-He/Glacier.html Confluences • Interfaces • Sacramento & Feather Glaciers • Moraines • Glacier Bay National Park Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Moraines and LCS “Appearing as dark lines on the surface, moraines indicate how many smaller glaciers feed into the system” -> LCS, dynamical systems from: www.fs.fed.us/r10/tongass/forest_facts/resources/geology/icefields.htm Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Overview Related Work Height Ridges Filtered AMR Ridge Extraction Efficiency FTLE & FSLE Proposed: FTLEM FTLEM & FSLE Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Related Work Ridge Extraction • Eberly 1996: Ridges in Image and Data Analysis (nD) • Furst et al. 2001: Marching Ridges (2D) • Sahner et al. 2005: Streamlines in Feature Flow Field (1D) LCS • Hussain 1986: Based on vorticity (3D) • Robinson 1991: Based on correlation (3D) • Haller 2001: Ridges in FTLE, material surfaces (2D) FTLE • Lorenz 1965: Measures predictability • Haller 2001: Based on pre-sampled flow map Path Line Oriented Topology • Theisel et al. 2004: Based on geometry of path lines • Shi et al. 2006: Same for periodic fields Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
min s = 0 , min 0 min Height Ridges Eberly 1996: • s : scalar field • min : min. eigenvalue of Hessian (s) • min : eigenvector for min (min ridge) • 2D height ridge in 3-space: min s = 0 min 0 Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
PCA |, | : “min s = 0” min 0 ,min 0 Height Ridges Furst et al. 2001: Marching Ridges • Orientate min at nodes of cell by PCA • Evaluate min s at nodes • Interpolate zero crossings on edges • Use zero crossings with min 0 • Triangulate crossings • We also filter crossings e.g. by FTLE • We use Marching Cubes instead of triangulation Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Filtered AMR Ridge Extraction: Motivation Avoid sampling • in regions with no ridges (after filtering) Advantages • if only few ridges are present in given data • if data can be sampled at arbitrary locations • if cost of sampling is high Accuracy • Obtained ridges identical to those from uniform sampling • Rarely small or faint ridges may get missed (see paper) Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Filtered AMR Ridge Extraction Initialization: Ridge-Cell Detection ridge intersects cell edge Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Filtered AMR Ridge Extraction Initialization: Ridge-Cell Detection ridge cell Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Filtered AMR Ridge Extraction Iteration 1: Collect for Subdivision ridge cell ridge cell neighbor Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Filtered AMR Ridge Extraction Iteration 1: Subdivision Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Filtered AMR Ridge Extraction Iteration 1: Ridge-Cell Detection ridge intersects cell edge Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Filtered AMR Ridge Extraction Iteration 1: Ridge-Cell Detection ridge cell Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Filtered AMR Ridge Extraction Iteration 1: Ridge Growing ridge cell ridge cell 2-neighbor Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Filtered AMR Ridge Extraction Iteration 1: Ridge Growing ridge cell Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Filtered AMR Ridge Extraction Iteration 1: Ridge Growing ridge intersects cell edge ridge cell Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Filtered AMR Ridge Extraction Iteration 1: Ridge Growing ridge cell Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Filtered AMR Ridge Extraction Iteration 2: Collect for Subdivision ridge cell ridge cell neighbor Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Filtered AMR Ridge Extraction Iteration 2: Subdivision Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Filtered AMR Ridge Extraction Iteration 2: Ridge-Cell Detection ridge intersects cell edge Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Filtered AMR Ridge Extraction Iteration 2: Ridge-Cell Detection ridge cell Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Filtered AMR Ridge Extraction Iteration 2: Ridge Growing ridge cell ridge cell 2-neighbor Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Filtered AMR Ridge Extraction Iteration 2: Ridge Growing ridge cell ridge cell 2-neighbor for 1-level difference Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Filtered AMR Ridge Extraction Iteration 2: Ridge Growing ridge cell Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Filtered AMR Ridge Extraction Iteration 2: Ridge Growing ridge intersects cell edge ridge cell Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Filtered AMR Ridge Extraction Iteration 2: Ridge Growing ridge cell Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Filtered AMR Ridge Extraction Iteration 3: Collect for Subdivision ridge cell ridge cell neighbor Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Filtered AMR Ridge Extraction Iteration 3: … . . . Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Filtered AMR Ridge Extraction Final Result Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Filtered AMR Ridge Extraction from FTLE: Method video Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Filtered AMR Ridge Extraction from FTLE: Francis Turbine video Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Efficiency Subdivision iterations: 4 Speed-up: > 4 Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Finite-Size Lyapunov Exponent (FSLE), Aurell 1997 FSLE: “time needed to separate by factor s” Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
FTLE & FSLE (Filtered) FTLE T = 0.1 FSLE Prescribed scale = 1.5 Tmax = 0.1 FSLE Prescribed scale = 4 Tmax = 0.1 Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Proposed: Finite-Time Lyapunov Exponent Maximum (FTLEM) … FTLEM: “maximum FTLE over advection time T” Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
FTLEM & FSLE (Filtered) FTLEM Tmax = 0.1 Properties of both FSLE FSLE Prescribed scale = 1.5 Tmax = 0.1 FSLE Prescribed scale = 4 Tmax = 0.1 Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Conclusion • Efficient method for ridge extraction • Applied to FTLE, FSLE and FTLEM • FTLEM as a new FTLE variant • Future Work • Exploit temporal coherency Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
Thanks for your attention Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction
FTLE Ridge Filtering No filtering FTLEmin = 3.5, 4.0 & CCmin = 1000, 4000 tria Efficient Visualization of LCS by filtered AMR Ridge Extraction