1 / 46

Skills Development Provinces and SETAs 2006 2007 - 2008

maitland
Download Presentation

Skills Development Provinces and SETAs 2006 2007 - 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    1. 3 June 2008 1 Skills Development Provinces and SETAs 2006 – 2007 - 2008

    2. 3 June 2008 2

    3. 3 June 2008 3

    4. 3 June 2008 4 SETA Performance Management Framework Policy/Mandate: Skills Development Act Strategy : NSDS {Current =2005-2010} Regulations : Service Level Agreement Performance Assessment Scorecard ESSA based Performance and Governance Management System

    5. 3 June 2008 5 Performance Assessment Scorecard 5 x KRAs endorsed by the National Skills Authority NSDS 2005 - 2010 Success Indicators 16 out of 20 apply to SETAs 2005 – 2006 could only measure 7 out 16 2006 – 2007 could only measure 14 out of 16 2007 – 2008 will only measure 15 out of 15 {16} SI 2.4 National Standard in Good SD Practice – Now Annulled SI 5.3 Quality of Learning dependent on SAQA- NSDS 2005 - 2010 Equity Principles NSDS 2005 -2010 Governance NSDS 2005 - 2010 Funds Management NSDS 2005 - 2010 Provincial Linkages Reported for 2005 – 2006 Measured for 2006 – 2007 onwards

    6. 3 June 2008 6 NSDS 2005-2010: SUCCESS INDICATOR 1.1 Target: Signed updated SSP (annual) is submitted to DoL on the 31 August 2007: a) Signature of SETA Board Chairperson appended to the SSP b) Signature of the SETA agreed growth, development and equity strategy drivers and skills development bodies at national level appended to the SSP c) SETA SSP to be evaluated and approved by DoL Executive Manager responsible for quality assurance. Performance Status: All SETAs submitted their SSPs timely and have loaded the OFO Coded Scarce and Critical list onto ESSA as required and the list is published on the DoL Website. 19 SETA SSPs were approved outright with additional 3 SETAs having received conditional approval of their SSPs.

    7. 3 June 2008 7 NSDS 2005-2010: SUCCESS INDICATOR 1.2

    8. 3 June 2008 8 NSDS 2005-2010: SUCCESS INDICATOR 2.1

    9. 3 June 2008 9 NSDS 2005-2010: SUCCESS INDICATOR 2.2

    10. 3 June 2008 10 NSDS 2005-2010: SUCCESS INDICATOR 2.3 PSETA is the only SETA that is required to conclude a Service Level Agreement with DoL on this Success Indicator. Target = 138 National and Provincial Government Departments spend at least 1% personal budget on training 92 National and Provincial Government Departments reported on the expenditure of 1% personal budget on training PSETA has performed below average in terms of accessing information from Government Departments as required due to lack of support from some Government Departments. ```Note: A process has been established by PSETA in which detailed information is being collected for this purpose outside the normal WSP/ATR submissions process

    11. 3 June 2008 11 NSDS 2005-2010: SUCCESS INDICATOR 2.5 SETA Collective Target = 2571 BEE Firms and BEE Co-Operatives to be Supported SETA Collective Achievement = 1293 BEE Firms and BEE Co-Operatives Supported Collective Underperformance = 4671 Shortfall of BEE Firms and BEE Co-Operatives The following eleven SETAs; BANKSETA, CHIETA, ESETA,FOODBEV, HWSETA, INSETA, LGSETA, MQA, SASSETA, THETA and TETA have under performed in terms of the minimum required standards due to amongst other things lack of policies in the SETAs to ensure support is provided to BEE Firms and BEE Co-Operatives. Figure 2.5 (A): Number of Small BEE Firms Supported 2005/2006 – 2006/2007

    12. 3 June 2008 12 NSDS 2005-2010: SUCCESS INDICATOR 2.7

    13. 3 June 2008 13 NSDS 2005-2010: SUCCESS INDICATOR 2.8

    14. 3 June 2008 14 NSDS 2005-2010: SUCCESS INDICATOR 3.2

    15. 3 June 2008 15 NSDS 2005-2010: SUCCESS INDICATOR 4.1

    16. 3 June 2008 16 NSDS 2005-2010: SUCCESS INDICATOR 4.2

    17. 3 June 2008 17 NSDS 2005-2010: SUCCESS INDICATOR 4.3

    18. 3 June 2008 18 NSDS 2005-2010: SUCCESS INDICATOR 5.1

    19. 3 June 2008 19 NSDS 2005-2010: SUCCESS INDICATOR 5.2

    20. 3 June 2008 20

    21. 3 June 2008 21 KRA 2: NSDS 2005-2010: EQUITY PRINCIPLES

    22. 3 June 2008 22 KRA 3: NSDS 2005-2010: GOVERNANCE

    23. 3 June 2008 23 KRA 4: NSDS 2005-2010: FUNDS MANAGEMENT

    24. 3 June 2008 24 KRA 5: NSDS 2005-2010: PROVINCIAL LINKAGES

    25. 3 June 2008 25

    26. 3 June 2008 26

    27. 3 June 2008 27

    28. 3 June 2008 28

    29. 3 June 2008 29

    30. 3 June 2008 30

    31. 3 June 2008 31

    32. 3 June 2008 32

    33. 3 June 2008 33 Two Year Comparative Analysis

    34. 3 June 2008 34 SETA “specific” Performance Management Action Plans implemented by DoL Encourage/Reward SETAs that performed well and ensure continuous improvement to sustain benchmarks Engage with individual SETAs regarding specific deficiencies and ensure implementation of remedial action Implement ESSA based Performance and Governance Management System

    35. 3 June 2008 35 ESSA based Performance and Governance Management System

    36. 3 June 2008 36

    37. 3 June 2008 37 Current SETA Legislated Governance & Funding Model Section 9 (2) of SDA requires SETAs to be established within discrete sectors (economic) Nationally not Provincially Result is that funding model is a national economic sector funding model Raised as a Scope and Mandate issue in NEDLAC SETA Review Report

    38. 3 June 2008 38

    39. 3 June 2008 39

    40. 3 June 2008 40 SDA Amendment Bill 2008 Section 36: Regulations Addition to empower for provinces: The Minister may, after consulting with the NSA, make regulations regarding the establishment of skills development forums in respect of each provincial office and specifying the operation, composition and functions of the forums;

    41. 3 June 2008 41

    42. 3 June 2008 42

    43. 3 June 2008 43

    44. 3 June 2008 44

    45. 3 June 2008 45 Learnership Impact Evaluation Study 1 – December 2004 77% placement of unemployed learners 73% placement at actual learning places Study 2 – About to be completed by HSRC Broader scope, 8000 learners across all SETAs In depth analysis by age, race, gender, province Detailed presentation to be shared with Parliamentary Committees in near future Integral to Economic Cluster PoA & APEX Project 9 Recommendations on the Learnership impact evaluation report implemented by 31st March 2009

    46. 3 June 2008 46

More Related