1 / 19

Overview of the ANITA Experiment

Eric W. Grashorn Center for Cosmology & AstroParticle Physics The Ohio State University. Overview of the ANITA Experiment. Cosmogenic Neutrinos. > 10 18 eV neutrinos predicted by many acceleration and interaction processes at source locations

maja
Download Presentation

Overview of the ANITA Experiment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Eric W. Grashorn Center for Cosmology & AstroParticle Physics The Ohio State University Overview of the ANITA Experiment

  2. Cosmogenic Neutrinos • > 1018 eV neutrinos predicted by many acceleration and interaction processes at source locations • Observations, interaction physics suggest ultra-high energy cosmic rays will interact with the CMB to produce neutrinos • Berezinsky & Zatsepin, 1970, require > 1018 eV neutrinos • Lack of neutrinos could mean • UHECRs are not hadrons (?!) • Lorentz invariance wrong (!!) • New physics… • Expected fluxes are small • 1 neutrino per km2 per week! Courtesy Peter Gorham

  3. ANITA • ANtarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna • International collaboration: 42 collaborators, 13 institutions, 3 counties

  4. ANITA • Ballon-borne payload, designed to detect broadband radio neutrino signals • Askaryan effect • coherent radio emission • Eth ~1018.5 eV • Advantages: • Ice is transparent to radio • Low cost (~$10M) • Target volume ~1.6x106 km3! • reduces to ~ 103 km3 sr • Disadvantages • Short duty cycle Gorham et al., Astropart Phys. 2009

  5. Askaryan Effect • Coherent radio emission from excess negative charge in EM shower • Positrons annihilated, electrons scattered into shower • Longer than 10-20 cm at radio wavelengths • Appears as a single charge Z~108 e- • Coherent, P~E2 • Fast, impulsive signal Saltzberg & Gorham, PRL 2001

  6. ANITA 1 Payload • 32 Quad ridge, dual polarization feedhorns • 16 in lower ring, 16 in mid/upper rings • Each effectively observes 22.5º in azimuth, pointed 10ºdown from horizontal • Antennas in lower and either mid or upper ring make up one “phi sector” • Design constraints: • Fast digitization, low power consumption • Custom electronics, • 72 channels of 2.6 GSa/s • Power system provides ~500W Courtesy Jeff Kowalski

  7. Event Detection • Better than 60 ps timing • Pulse-phase interferometer resolution of radio impulse • < 0.3º elev. • ~1º azimuth • Neutrino direction • 2º elevation • Earth absorption • 5º azimuth • Polarization angle of detected impulse Gorham et al., Astropart Phys. 2009

  8. Radio Neutrino Event • Simulated 3 x 1018 eV neutrino • false color image of E-field strength of emerging Cherenkov cone • Color scale is normalized to the peak (blue) in each pane Gorham et al., Astropart Phys. 2009

  9. Backgrounds • “Carrier Wave” (CW); near sinusoidal • High narrow-band power, can saturate the system • Impulsive • Electronic switching phenomena • Sources: • “Anthropogenic” • “Unintentional” impulsive satellite signals- solid state relays, actuators • Terrestrial signals- easy to identify because encampments are sparse • Cosmic Ray Air Showers: could produce H-pol signal Note: no physics background in V-pol!

  10. Event Display • Event most likely West Antarctica camp noise • Triggers: • Yellow, L1: impulse exceeds SNR in 3 of 8 channels on individual antenna; ~150 kHz • Green, L2: coincidence between adjacent L1 in the same ring; ~40kHz • Blue, L3: coincidence between L2 triggers in same phi sector; ~5Hz Gorham et al., Astropart Phys. 2009

  11. ANITA 1 Flight Path • 35 days aloft, 3.5 orbits • Average ice depth, integrated over the entire horizon Gorham et al., Astropart Phys. 2009

  12. ANITA 1 Sensitivity • Effective livetime: 17.3 days • False color map in celestial coordinates (RA, Dec) • For 1020 eV neutrinos Gorham et al., Astropart Phys. 2009

  13. ANITA 1 Data • 8.2 M hardware triggers • Cuts optimized on 10% data set (blind analysis) • Require upcoming plane wave, impulsive broadband, isolated from camps and other events. Gorham et al., Astropart Phys. 2009

  14. ANITA 1 Results • Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 051103 (2009) • 6 H-pol, 0 V-pol survive cuts • H-pol originate above ice sheet (not n candidates) • Fresnel transmission • Askaryan impulse generation • In absence of observed n, a limit is set • First result to constrain GZK n production models Gorham et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2009

  15. ANITA 2 Improvements • “Dynamic Phi-Masking” • Active suppression of phi-sector readout during transit over noisy areas • McMurdo, South Pole, etc • Automatically activated • 8 “nadir” antennas • One antenna shared w/ 2 phi sectors • Modified trigger: • 2 of 3 channels, plus full-band (no H-pol) • Improve Tsys by 40K • New front end • Overall energy threshold improvement: • Factor of ~1.7 • ANITA gains as Eth-2, so ~ factor of 3 event rate increase Courtesy Ryan Nichol

  16. ANITA 2 Flight Path • 2+ Orbits • Time aloft: 30d 14h 45m • Compared to ANITA1… • More time near E. Antarctica • Less time near SP • Dynamic phi masking seemed to work as advertised Courtesy Kim Palladino

  17. ANITA 2 Status • About 30 M events • Nearly four-fold increase over ANITA 1 • Recovery completed • Minimal problems • Only one feedhorn damaged! • Analysis underway Courtesy Brian Hill

  18. Further Work • Cosmic Rays • Naïve MC shows ANITA 1 expects 4.5 CR events • Consistent with 6 detected H-pol • More sophisticated MC • Radio Extensive Air-shower Simulation (REAS) code (T. Huege) • Geosynchrotron mechanism • Neutrinos from GRB • Initial ANITA 1 calculations from K. Paladino thesis

  19. Summary • ANITA 1 results Published • Instrument paper: Astropart. Phys. 32, 10 (2009) • Physics result: Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 051103 (2009) • New ANITA 1 limits exclude GZK n productionmodel parameter space for the first time • ANITA 2, with improved sensitivity, completed a 30 day mission January 20 • More time spent over deeper ice than ANITA 1 • New result is coming soon…

More Related