1 / 13

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Implementation of the reauthorized ESEA AYP Update

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Implementation of the reauthorized ESEA AYP Update. Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2004. Adequate Yearly Progress. Determining AYP. NCLB Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP):

makan
Download Presentation

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Implementation of the reauthorized ESEA AYP Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. No Child Left BehindAct of 2001Implementation of thereauthorized ESEA AYP Update Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2004

  2. Adequate Yearly Progress Determining AYP • NCLB Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP): • Test participation (95%) • Graduation or attendance (90% of state average or growth) • Reading • Mathematics

  3. Adequate Yearly Progress Determining AYP Data must be disaggregated by the following subgroups(for test participation, reading, and mathematics): Minimum cell size

  4. School District Eco Dis. LEP As/ Pac. Black ALL STUDENTS ALL STUDENTS Hispanic White SwD Am. In. • Adequate Yearly Progress Determining AYP If minimum cell size IS reached...

  5. School District Eco Dis. Eco Dis. LEP As/ Pac. Black ALL STUDENTS ALL STUDENTS Hispanic White White SwD Am. In. • Adequate Yearly Progress Determining AYP If minimum cell size IS reached...

  6. State • Adequate Yearly Progress Determining AYP District School

  7. 100 2004-05 80 61% 60 Accelerated annual gains beginning 2010-11 37% 40 20 0 • Adequate Yearly Progress Wisconsin Proficient by 2013-14 = 100% % Proficient/Advanced Reading Mathematics 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2010-11 2001-02 2009-10 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

  8. The identification… • Adequate Yearly Progress Missing AYP two consecutive years in: Test Participation Other Indicator Reading Mathematics Schools: SIFI Districts: DIFI

  9. 34 schools 26 districts 17 3 1 0 0 0 • Adequate Yearly Progress Wisconsin SIFI/DIFI Data 2003-04(as of November 2004) 51 schools and 1 district identified for improvement Test Participation Reading Mathematics Grad./Att.

  10. 25 High 17 Mid/Combo. 9 Elementary 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 • Adequate Yearly Progress Wisconsin SIFI/DIFI Data 2003-04(as of November 2004) Number of SIFI Schools by SchoolLevel

  11. 43% High 91% Mid/Combo. 93% Elementary 0 20 40 60 80 100 • Adequate Yearly Progress Wisconsin SIFI/DIFI Data 2003-04(as of November 2004) SIFI Schools by Percent Free/Reduced Lunch State average=20% State average=30% State average=40%

  12. 6 (Improved) 2 19 (Improved) 4 13 (Improved) 6 3 Level1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 • Adequate Yearly Progress Wisconsin SIFI/DIFI Data 2003-04(as of November 2004) School improvement levels

  13. 73 57 schools districts 26 24 24 7 1 1 • Adequate Yearly Progress Wisconsin AYP Data 2003-04(as of November 2004) 108 schools and 30 districts missed AYP Test Participation Reading Mathematics Grad./Att.

More Related