130 likes | 336 Views
Critical Equipment Inspections. Xstrata Coal South Africa. Contents. Historical situation ATCOM Fatal accident 23/02/2004 Identification of critical equipment and installations Inspection criteria used Out sourcing contract work Tagging of equipment. Historical review.
E N D
Critical Equipment Inspections Xstrata Coal South Africa
Contents • Historical situation • ATCOM Fatal accident 23/02/2004 • Identification of critical equipment and installations • Inspection criteria used • Out sourcing contract work • Tagging of equipment
Historical review • Pre use inspection lists for equipment • Log book system • No physical proof of inspections conducted • Contractors pack requirements
Critical equipment • List compiled of critical equipment and installations • Inspection criteria developed
ATCOM 23 February 2004 • Incident -Electrocution • Work planned to replace water column – contractors pack completed • Task delayed – Making up of pipes – work extended into evening • Changing conditions – rain, darkness and using different type of tools as planned • Sub contractor bring additional undisclosed equipment onto mine • Faulty extension lead and inadequate earth leakage protection • Incident • Medical condition of now deceased • Certificate of compliance for electrical installations
Short Comings identified • Appointment of responsible persons to do various inspections ( plant / opencast working) • Listing of critical equipment and installations • Proof that inspections were carried out – not a paper exercise • Inspection of contractors/ sub contractors equipment
Tagging of equipment and out sourcing of inspection authority • Appointment of Gear Industry – legal appointment • Critical inspection lists developed and signed off mine engineers (include vehicle checks) • Quality inspections carried out of facility by mine engineers • Requirement in contractors pack that inspections were conducted and equipment tagged • Three month inspection cycle observed • Pre-use inspection system still in place for daily checks
Results of inspections • Past four months: • 28% rejection on vehicles – breaks and lights • 23% rejection on vehicles – fire extinguishers • 26% rejection on electrical equipment • 25% on hydraulic/ lifting and other equipment • Improvement on the quality of equipment from contractors that have been through the process