250 likes | 340 Views
The Nature of γ-ray Source 3EG J2020+4017. 陳致維 Chen Chih-Wei. Outline. 1. Gamma-ray telescope 2. Geminga 3. 3EG J2020+4017(2CG078+2, 2EG J2020+4026) 4. RX J2020.2+4026 5. S312 6. Summary. Gamma-ray telescope. 1.position error is large 2.count rate is very slow
E N D
The Nature of γ-ray Source 3EG J2020+4017 陳致維 Chen Chih-Wei
Outline • 1. Gamma-ray telescope • 2. Geminga • 3. 3EG J2020+4017(2CG078+2, 2EG J2020+4026) • 4. RX J2020.2+4026 • 5. S312 • 6. Summary
Gamma-ray telescope • 1.position error is large • 2.count rate is very slow • 3.EGRET on the CGRO • 4.GLAST: GLAST has a detector area of about one square metre and will detect and locate burst with energies 20-300 MeV within a field of view of 2 steradians.(ref.1)
Geminga • 1.meaning: a. Gamma-ray source in Gemini b. It is not there(ref.1) • 2.period : 273ms(ref.2) • 3.radio quiet (ref.1) : a. radio beam is not intersecting our line of sign: radio beam misaligned with gamma ray beam. b. no radio beam: the properties of the magnetosphere.
3EG J2020+4017 • 1. gamma ray pulsar properties:(ref.3) a. constant sources on long time scale. b. hard spectra in 100Mev~1Gev. c. energy output is concentrated in gamma-ray band. d. high energy cut-offs at a few GeV
2EG J2020+4026 Spectrum( ref.4): ~~gamma ray data
2. Brazier used “evolutionary” method to try to find pulsation in gamma ray data in the range 13.3≧f≧2 , f’ ≦10^(-11) => no pulsation => they thought the proximity of sever other EGRET source weakened it.(2EG J2026+3610,2EG J2019+3719, and 2EG J2033+4112.) (ref.5)
RX J2020.2+4026(ref.5) • 1.ROSAT Data:
2. single point –like X-ray source within the EGRET 95 per cent confidence box. 3. With total about 140 source counts and a high , complex background, it was not possible to calculate the shape of the source spectrum from existing data.
4.optical counterparts to RX J2020.2+4023 a. optical spectrum is K0V star b. Fγ/Fx is consistent with the late-type stars c. the association between star “A” and RX J2020.2+4023
Pulsar or other options? • 1. pulsar: did not find pulsation . • 2. diffuse source: hard to explain high energy break. 3. Brazier suggested => a young pulsar.(ref.5)
S312(ref.6) • 1. Chandra data ( observation ID 3856) • 2. counterparts a.USNO-B1.0 position (optical)=> match the optical K0V star b. 2MASS position( infrared) => match K0V star • 3. spectral analysis: ( energy range from 0.5 to 8.0 keV) a. absorbed power law => spectral index= 8.2 ﹗ b. blackbody c. MEKAL spectrum =>S312 is a K0V star
4. radio observation: a. GBT( Green Bank Telescope) b. no convincing pulsar –like signal were found. c. 3EG J2020+4017 is radio quiet
Summary(ref.6) • 1. 3EG J2020+4017 is radio quiet • 2. Becker suggested that : X-ray emission may not be due to the main-sequence star but could arise from an accreting compact companion. • 3. 3EG J2020+4017 is a neutron star with an X-ray luminosity similar to that observed from Vela-like to middle-age pulsars • 4. pulsation and further observation=> GLAST
Reference: • 1. Pulsar Astronomy, A.G. Lyne and Francis Graham-Smith • 2. Halpern J.P., Holt S.,1992,Nat,357,222 • 3. Thompson D. J. et al.,1994, ApJ,436,229 • 4. Merck M. et al., A&AS,120,465 • 5. Brazier K. T. S., et al, 1996,MNRAS, 281,1033 • 6. Becker, W., el al., ApJ,615, 897