80 likes | 186 Views
AToM MIB WG. IETF 60 th Meeting August 3, 2004. Kam Lam (hklam@lucent.com) Faye Ly ( faye@pedestalnetworks.com ). Agenda. Administrative matters 5 minutes WG Status 10 minutes Discussion 35 minutes IMA Interface Type MIB <draft-ietf-atommib-imamib-00.txt>
E N D
AToM MIB WG IETF 60th MeetingAugust 3, 2004 Kam Lam (hklam@lucent.com) Faye Ly (faye@pedestalnetworks.com )
Agenda • Administrative matters 5 minutes • WG Status 10 minutes • Discussion 35 minutes • IMA Interface Type MIB <draft-ietf-atommib-imamib-00.txt> • Implementation Feedback • Possible Future topics • Milestone & Charter Updates 5 minutes • Wrap up 5 minutes
Administrative matters • Work Group Charter http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/atommib-charter.html • Minute-taker Please readhttp://www.ietf.org/instructions/minutes.html • Sign-up sheet • Review of agenda • Allocation of time
Status of Current Work • MIB Published • RFC3593 (TC-15-min), RFC 3592 (SONET), RFC3591 (Optical) • RFC3606 (ATM2) • MIBs in Editor Queue • 2495bis (DS1/E1/DS2/E2) <draft-ietf-atommib-rfc2495bis-06.txt> • 2496bis (DS3/E3) <draft-ietf-atommib-rfc2496-bis-06.txt> • MIB received • IMA <draft-ietf-atommib-imamib-00.txt>
Status of Current Work (Cont.) • Implementation Feedback • Trunk MIBs • RFC 2494 (DS0): Not Requested • RFC 2495 (DS1/DS2): Requested; Two replies received • RFC 2496 (DS3): Requested; Two replies received • ATM Accounting MIBs • RFC 2512, RFC 2513: Requested; No reply received yet • ATM TC & Object MIBs • RFC 2514 (TC): Requested; Three replies received • RFC 2515: Requested; Three replies received
Discussion • ATM IMA MIB – Faye Ly & Orly Nicklass <draft-ietf-atommib-imamib-00.txt> • Implementation Feedback • Trunk MIB: RFC 2494, 2495, 2496 • ATM Accounting: RFC 2512, 2513 • ATM TC & Object: RFC 2514, 2515 • ATM2: RFC 3606 • Possible Future Work • Advancing RFC 2494 (DS0) • Virtual concatenation (TDM)
Current Milestones & Proposed Update • Jan 04: Re-evaluate charter or close the WG *** Re-charter for IMA work ??? • Jan 04: Submit any needed revisions of RFC2494 to the IESG for standards track advancement as appropriate *** No submission received. Remove this item ??? • Jan 04: Submit any needed revisions of RFC2512-2513 to the IESG for consideration of standards track advancement as appropriate *** No submission received. Remove this item ??? • Mar 04: Submit any needed revisions of RFC2514-2515 (ATM TC & Object) to the IESG for consideration of standards track advancement as appropriate *** Remove??? • Mar 04: Submit any needed revisions of RFC2495-2496 to the IESG for standards track advancement as appropriate *** Done • Mar 04 Report on implementation experience on RFC 2514-2515 *** Remove? • Mar 04 Report on implementation experience on RFC 2512-2513 *** Remove? • Mar 04 Report on implementation experience on RFC 2494 *** Remove?
Current Milestones & Proposed Update • ??? 04 Report on implementation experience on RFC 3606 (atom2) • ??? 04 Submit IMA MIB for WG LC • ??? 04 Submit IMA MIB for IESG for approval