560 likes | 726 Views
SenseIT Continued : Enabling self-monitoring and feedback for Borderline patients, through a personal touch. Y .P.M.J. Derk s, MSc, licensed mental health psychologist University of Twente / Scelta, GGNet – Mental health care institute. Background information. Borderline PD.
E N D
SenseIT Continued: Enabling self-monitoring and feedback for Borderline patients, through a personal touch Y.P.M.J.Derks, MSc, licensed mental health psychologist University of Twente / Scelta, GGNet – Mental health care institute
Personality disorder Source: NIH - National Institute of Mental Health
Regulating emotions and thoughts Source: NIH - National Institute of Mental Health
Impulsive and reckless behaviour Source: NIH - National Institute of Mental Health
Unstable relationships with other people Source: NIH - National Institute of Mental Health
Goes to Scelta 3 days a week
Uses the VERS method for regulating emotions
Skilled with today’s technology
How do patients perceive the use and possible benefits of a digital assistant, monitoring physiological changes while raising awareness?
UR1: The feedback of the system should feel discreet and inconspicuous in the environment. Therefore mainly feedback only noticeable by the user will be used like vibration or neutral sounds. Visser, T.
UR2: The user should be able to adjust the intensity and form of feedback received by the system. Therefore the application will provide different options to personalize the application Visser, T.
UR3 - The feedback provided to the user should be without opinion, in other words it should not contain any valuation. Therefore the feedback will consists of suggestions of assignments or only a clear indication of a shift in physiological status Visser, T.
DR5 - The visual complexity of the application should be kept to a minimum to prevent unwanted arousal among patients. Liqiong, D., & Poole, M. S
Calculates physiological state (based on the 10 last measurements)
Calculating physiological states • Iteration #2
Calculating physiological states • Average heart rate: 75 — standard deviation: 10 — sensitivity excluded • Iteration #2
Wearable device • Iteration #2
Self reporting • Iteration #2
Self reporting • Context to • measurement • Diary • Iteration #2
Iteration #2 • Results
Iteration #2 • Experience of feedback cues differs
Iteration #2 • Interfaces and easiness of system perceived well
Iteration #2 • Interpersonal contact preferred
Iteration #2 • Aware of what to share with whom
Iteration #2 • Most likeable smartwatch interface
Iteration #2 • Day 1: Adding context to measurement is useful
Iteration #2 • Usefulness of Adding Context to Measurements