140 likes | 288 Views
Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made within the context of an IETF activity is considered an "IETF Contribution". Such statements
E N D
Note Well • Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC • and any statement made within the context of an IETF activity is considered an "IETF Contribution". Such statements • include oral statements in IETF sessions, as well as written and electronic communications made at any time or place, • which are addressed to: • The IETF plenary session • The IESG, or any member thereof on behalf of the IESG • Any IETF mailing list, including the IETF list itself, any working group or design • team list, or any other list functioning under IETF auspices • Any IETF working group or portion thereof • The IAB or any member thereof on behalf of the IAB • The RFC Editor or the Internet-Drafts function • All IETF Contributions are subject to the rules of RFC 5378 and RFC 3979 (updated by RFC 4879). • Statements made outside of an IETF session, mailing list or other function, that are clearly not intended to be input to • an IETF activity, group or function, are not IETF Contributions in the context of this notice. • Please consult RFC 5378 and RFC 3979 for details. • A participant in any IETF activity is deemed to accept all IETF rules of process, as documented in Best Current • Practices RFCs and IESG Statements. • A participant in any IETF activity acknowledges that written, audio and video records of meetings may be made • and may be available to the public.
MPLS Working group IETF76 in Hiroshima
Meetings in Hiroshima • MPLS wg Monday • MPLS wg Wednesday • Webex – non audio • PWE3 wg Thursday • Webex • PWE3 wg Friday • Webex (?) • CCAMP on Wednesday • CCAMP on Thursday
WG Status • One new RFCs • RFC 5654 “MPLS-TP Requirements” • Drafts in RFC-Editor’s queue • draft-ietf-mpls-3209-patherr • draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp-reroute • draft-ietf-mpls-soft-preemption • draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-end-of-lib • draft-ietf-mpls-tp-gach-dcn
WG Organization • WG co-chairs • George and Loa • WG secretary • Martin • mpls@ietf.org • Eric • mpls-tp@itef.org & http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/misc/mpls-tp/ • Elisa
MEAD team • Started as an MPLS interoperability design team • more than MPLS-TP • MPLS-TP was only the first task • Very efficient for the first 6-9 months • limited number of documents • Very focused • 1st priority of many of the members • 10 drafts to the IESG • Thank you for the effort!
MEAD team • More and more like a working group • more IDs and RFCs than most working groups • started to look like a working group • … but design teams are not open? • A lot of perceptions • lot of things done behind closed doors • not possible for everyone to participate • Reality • most work done by ID authors and on the mpls-tp list • Long term effects • loss of focus • increasing work load • Conclusion • work for a working group – let the working groups do it! • activity is picking up again
The “Steering Group” • The close down of MEAD resulted in at least on new group! • the mpls-tp steering group • no power as a group • but a good whistle • members from the IETF and ITU-T SG15 leadership • We will have a meeting here in Hiroshima
WG Status • Drafts in IESG Processing • draft-ietf-mpls-mpls-and-gmpls-security-framework • In IETF Last Call • draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-te-mib • Revised ID Needed • draft-ietf-mpls-tp-nm-req • In IETF Last Call • draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-requirements • Revised ID Needed
WG Status • Active WG drafts • draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone • draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-framework (agenda item) • draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-no-php-oob-mapping (agenda item) • draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-p2mp (agenda item) • draft-ietf-mpls-tp-survive-fwk (agenda item) • draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-enhanced-dsmap (waiting for p2mp-lsp-ping) • draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-lsp-ping (new version before xmas) • draft-ietf-mpls-tp-nm-framework (agenda item) • draft-ietf-mpls-tp-process (agenda item) • draft-ietf-mpls-tp-framework (agenda item) • draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-typed-wildcard (ready to request publication) • draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-upstream (LC completed) • draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-upstream (LC completed - comments) • draft-ietf-mpls-fastreroute-mib • draft-ietf-mpls-ip-options (this is ready to go, but is waiting for write-up) • draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ach-tlv (there are tlvs proposed, and more to come)
WG Status - outliers • IAB draft • draft-iab-mpls-tp-uncoord-harmful • auth48 • OPSAWG draft • draft-opsawg-mpls-tp-oam-def • CCAMP drafts • draft-bellagamba-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext • draft-abfb-mpls-tp-control-plane-framework
MPLS-TP Mode of work • This is now working group work • mpls (lead), pwe3, ccamp, l2vpn, opsawg • We have regular phone conferences • to do initial reviews of documents • to keep up the progress • mpls-tp@ietf.org • the consensus list for mpls-tp work.
OAM Draft post-Stockholm • BFD and LSP Ping Encapsulation for the ACH • draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-lsp-ping-bfd-procedures-01 • BFD Extensions • draft-asm-mpls-tp-bfd-cc-cv-01 • - LSP Ping Extensions • draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-lsp-ping-extensions-00 • - AIS and Lock Reporting • draft-sfv-mpls-tp-fault-00 • Lock Instruct • no draft yet (but will based in draft-boutros-mpls-tp-loopback) • Need to be merged with the lock-instruct draft • CFI • draft-he-mpls-tp-csf-01.txt (pwe3) -> covered by draft-martini-pwe3-static-pw-status-02.txt (pwe3) • Packet Loss & Packet Delay • merged into draft-frost-mpls-tp-loss-delay
De-valuation • We have found that we have been to liberal with time allocation for slots, so we decided to de-value the minute with 10%