1 / 20

The University of Montana

The University of Montana. Institutional Trends – FY00 – FY09. How much has the General Funds budget grown over the last 10 years?. Answer : 69%, or $55 million. How have the primary sources of revenue changed since FY00?. State appropriation 45% Tuition and Fees 87%.

malaya
Download Presentation

The University of Montana

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The University of Montana Institutional Trends – FY00 – FY09

  2. How much has the General Funds budget grown over the last 10 years? Answer: 69%, or $55 million

  3. How have the primary sources of revenue changed since FY00? State appropriation 45% Tuition and Fees 87%

  4. How has the Cost of Attendance for Resident students changed since FY00?

  5. How much has enrollment grown over the same period? Enrollment Growth 1,494 FTE 13%

  6. Has much has cost-per-student grown? • IncreasedCost per Student: • Cumulative • FY00-FY09 • 49% Average 5.4% Per year

  7. How does this compare to inflation? Cost/StudentCPIHEPI Cumulative 49% 27.5% 38.7% Average 5.4% 3.1% 4.3%

  8. How does our cost-per-student compare to national benchmarks? According to the Lumina Foundation’s 2006 Delta Cost Project , UM was the most the most cost-efficient public research institution in the nation. In 2007, the National Center for Higher Education Management Systems found that Montana universities ranked 45th (6th lowest) in the nation for dollars spent per FTE student at $9,124. UM’s cost-per student in 2007 was $9,762. By comparison, Alaska (1st) spent $18,352 while Florida universities (50th) spent an average of $7,873.

  9. Has the growth been equal across programs and expense categories? Answer: No

  10. Expenses by Program FY00 vs FY09 Note: FY00 figures are adjusted to reflect the reclassification of IT costs in FY04.

  11. Which programs have grown the fastest? Cumulative Growth Rate 208% 94% 94% By Program Scholarships/Fee Waivers Operation & Maintenance of Plant Research

  12. Why has Fee Waiver cost gone up so dramatically?Utilization (number of students) $3.0 millionTuition Rate Increases 3.8 millionTotal $6.8 million

  13. What makes up the O&M cost increase?

  14. Health Care Benefits per person

  15. How have staffing levels changed?

  16. Employee FTE Growth by Category

  17. Employee FTE Growth by Program Note: FY00 Institutional Support figures are adjusted to reflect the reclassification of IT costs in FY04.

  18. Cumulative Salary ChangesFY00-FY09

  19. What do these data tell us? Discussion

  20. What additional questions are raised?

More Related