250 likes | 414 Views
Results based M&E: Experiences of school level education in Nepal. Teertha Dhakal Joint Secretary Government of Nepal. Presentation outline. Context- National M&E system (PMAS) Educational planning Results-based M&E in education M&E design of School Sector Reform Plan (SSRP)
E N D
Results based M&E: Experiences of school level education in Nepal Teertha Dhakal Joint Secretary Government of Nepal
Presentation outline • Context- National M&E system (PMAS) • Educational planning • Results-based M&E in education • M&E design of School Sector Reform Plan (SSRP) • Lessons learnt and Issues
Context • Despite difficult political situation Nepal has been institutionalizing MfDR in planning, budgeting and M&E with • Broad-based interventions • Piloting in key agencies • The country is in the process of • restructuring the state building new constitution, and • expedite development efforts focusing on results • This presentation includes efforts to institutionalize results based M&E in education sector in Nepal
MfDR- piloting in some agencies • Piloted in some ministries under ADB TA- Education, Local Development, Roads, Drinking Water) • Readiness assessment done and Business Plan refined • Results matrix prepared • Internal capacities enhanced • Piloted in 4 districts- awareness and capacity enhanced • ADB TA 7158- NEP: Strengthening capacity for MfDR under implementation (RBB, capacity building) • Other initiatives e.g. performance contracts
Context Education budget as share of public budget: 17% Primary edu budget as share of edu budget- 60%; as share of GDP- 2.22% Primary education free by law Primary NER: 89.1% (GPI: 0.98) Home to school distance (half an hour walk): 91% hhs High repetition & dropout rates– 29% repetition; 15% drop out in grade1 Survival rate in Grade 5- 81.1 % Reforms Efforts made to improve educational governance Community mgmt of schools Increased public investment in education Per capita funding to schools Moving towards universal completion of basic education (grade 1-8) Capacity devt at different levels Shift from project approach to SWAp Focus on results Primary Education in Nepal 7
Poverty Monitoring and Analysis System (PMAS)(A national level Results-based M&E system)
Why Poverty Monitoring and Analysis System (PMAS)? • PMAS aims to- • support the implementation of the national plan • coordinate monitoring the national plan and tracking the MDGs • communicate results as feedback into policy making process • make central M&E system results-based
Components of the PMAS Inputs Performance-based budget release PMAS- Major Components Implementation Monitoring Processes Outputs Outcome Monitoring Communication/Advocacy PMIS Outcomes Impacts Impact Analysis PRSP progress report
Sources of information for M&E PRSP Sectoral Targets MTEF/Budget allocation EMIS, Flash reports, PETS, Social audit, client satisfaction survey Release/Disbursement of allocated budget Outputs HH Surveys (NLSS, NDHS), Impact Analysis Outcomes Impact
Results based education M&E • Logic models in educational planning, programming and design of projects • Business plan and MTEF in the education sector • Linkages between national and sectoral monitoring • Education M&E in National Poverty Monitoring & Analysis System (PMAS) • SWAp in primary level has contributed to harmonize M&E system
Results based education M&E … • Streamlined and strengthened survey systems- Separate education modules in; • Nepal Living Standards Survey (5 yrs) • Nepal Demographic and Health Survey (5 yrs) • Nepal Labour Force Survey (5 yrs) • Periodic reviews inviting multiple actors/ stakeholders • Formative research institutionalized in school education • Learning achievement tests introduced • Focused on capacity building
EMIS and Flash Report System • The EMIS gathers school level educational performance data from all schools twice a year • Flash I- snapshot of data at the beginning of the school year • Flash II- focuses on end of school year data • The national flash report is prepared based on district flash reports • The reports cover enrolment, pass rates, repetition & survival rates, training status of teachers, supply of textbooks and learning materials • Te reports also show participation of SMCs/ PTAs in various activities of schools
M&E in SSRP • The SSRP is the school sector SWAp in Nepal which is funded by more than 10 devt partners in addition to government funding • The M&E aims to improve education services through informed decisions tracking achievements at each level of service delivery • M&E functions based on performance indicators include; • Assessing compliance with acts and regulations • Measuring progress against milestones and targets • Evaluating the impact of policies/strategies • Utilizes a decentralized monitoring system, use flash reports data, social audit, and provisions an external evaluation of outcomes • Education Review Office conducts external audits of agencies based on norms and standards and submits annual reports to the Education Policy Committee
Lessons learnt • SWAp contributory to institutionalize MfDR • Participatory design of M&E system crucial • Commitment and capacity key to success- focus lower levels and retain talents in the M&E function • Link incentives with credible M&E/ MIS data • Triangulation of methods/tools for data reliability • Strengthen the system rather re-inventing it • Make multi-party review meetings results- based • Produce data what is needed and usable
Challenges/ Issues • Make the system functional and effective • Cascading results approaches to lower levels- • capacity issues, • cost incurred • Data issues • frequency and reliability (survey vs. MIS) • disaggregated data- diverse social groups • Harmonize TA funding for capacity development • Frequent changes in leadership and key staff • Use of M&E data in managerial decision making
Discussion • Promote country level capacities monitoring education MDGs and EFA agenda through regional capacity building initiatives • Use of VLN of COP- MfDR to further build capacities through exchanging ideas