240 likes | 457 Views
Structure of thin films by electron diffraction. János L. Lábár. Usage of diffraction data in structure determination. Identifying known structures Solving unknown structures Structure determination Unit cell dimensions Space group symmetry
E N D
Structure of thin films by electron diffraction János L. Lábár
Usage of diffraction data in structure determination • Identifying known structures • Solving unknown structures • Structure determination • Unit cell dimensions • Space group symmetry • Unit cell content (atoms and their appr. coordinates) • Structure refinement • More accurate atomic coordinates • Validation of the structure (attainable match)
Structure determination • Periodic functions Fourier coefficients • Amplitude : diffraction the phase problem • Phase : real space (HRTEM, fragment) reciprocal space (Direct methods) • Single crystal diffraction • X-rays, neutrons electrons • Powder diffraction • X-rays, neutrons electrons
Single crystal diffraction • Tilting experiments • Identification of reflections: indexing • Unit cell dimensions • Space group symmetry (XRD, SAED, CBED) • Integration of individual intensities • Background • Phases (real reciprocal space) • Dynamic intensities in SAED
Single crystal diffraction • XRD: • Up to 2000 atoms in the asymmetric unit • Up to 100 atoms: guaranteed success • Rule of thumb: # refl > 10 * # atoms • SAED: • CRISP, ELD Direct methods (EDM) • Dynamic intensities in SIR97 • Up to 30 atoms in the asymmetric unit • Size, image
Powder diffraction • Collapse of 3D into 1D • Types: • Equivalent reflections, multiplicity • Exact overlap: e.g. (43l) (50l) in tetragonal • Accidental: within instrumental resolution • Indexing programs • Peak decomposition • La Bail • Pawley
Powder diffraction • Degree of overlap: Resolution • Background • Instability: negative peaks / oscillating int. • XRD (+ refinement from neutrons) : • Synchrotron: 60 atoms in asymmetric unit • Laboratory: 30 atoms in asymmetric unit • Neutron: better for refinement • SAED: instrumental resolution limit, BKG
Powder diffraction: SAED resolution (peak width) • Beam convergence • Elliptical distortion • OL spherical aberration size of selected area
Powder diffraction: Pattern decomposition with ProcessDiffraction • Background • Normal, log-Normal • Polynomial, Spline • Peak shapes • Gaussian, Lorentzian • Pseudo-Voigt • Global minimum • Downhill SIMPLEX • Manual control • Example: Al + Ge: SAED on film • Large crystal Al: Gaussian • Small crystal Ge: Lorentzian
Structure refinement: The Rietveld method • Start from assumed structure • Least-square fitting of whole-pattern • Fitting parameters: • Scale-factor • Atomic positions • Temperature factors • Cell parameters • Peak shape parameters (instrumenal sample) • Background • Additional peaks (phase)
The Rietveld method • Most known structures from Rietveld refinement • Scaling factors Quantitative phase analysis (volume fractions) • Neutrons: no angle dependence best for refinement • Resolution (peak width) is less important SAED can also be used efficiently for refinement • SAED: Cell parameters camera length
Quantitative phase analysis for nanocrystalline thin films from SAED • Example: 100 Å Al + 100Å NiO • Measured volume fraction by ProcessDiffraction: 51% Al + 49% NiO • Fitted parameters: peak parameters, L, scaling factors, DW
Structure refinement from SAED • Integrated intensities: • ELD • ProcessDiffraction • Refinement: • FullProf • ProcessDiffraction • Simple example: TiO2 – Anatase • Selection of origin transform „z” before compare
Structure refinement with ProcessDiffraction • Structure definition modul • Checks: coordinates site symmetry • Options modul checks • if selected site is „refinable” (variation of coordinate value does not change site symmetry) • If selected options are reasonable • Cross-checking for nanocrystalline samples • Pair correlation function (differentmodels measured)
Structure refinement with ProcessDiffraction • Example: Anatase 4 nm powder • Acceptable match • Refined position of oxygen: z=0.217 • Compare to z=0.2064 (Pearson’s) z=0.2094 (Weirich transformed)
Is the example result acceptable?Independent test • Pair correlation function • Measured • Calculated for both structures • Refined result is in agreement with g(r)
Remarks to refinement • Nanocrystalline films are strained • Exact shape and size of the background is ambiguous in electron diffraction • Refined position is also a function of refined cell dimensions (accurate calibration of camera length)
Conclusions: structure of thin films by electron diffraction • Phase identification from both single crystal and powder patterns • Quantitative phase analysis from nanocrystalline powder patterns • Structure determination from single crystal patterns (SAED, CBED) • Structure refinement from nanocrystalline powder patterns • Limits are still to be examined