E N D
1. Beyond Data A New Mexico Perspective
Mikki Rogers
Division of Health Improvement
Incident Management Bureau Chief
505-476-9015
mikki.rogers@state.nm.us
2. Incident Management BureauNM
3. Typical Data from Critical Incidents Statewide Average of confirmed Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation is 25 per 100 consumers
Provider specific confirmation rates per 100 consumers
Ranking of Providers
Number of consumers requiring medical attention beyond first aid
Raw data is published on the DHI website. Data is available for the past 8 years.
5. Data is broken down by the five different state regions.
Data is available by consumer
Data is trended by consumer, by provider
IMB management looks for increases in use of emergency services for consumers. On a quarterly basis we ask IDT’s to meet and complete assessments for consumers identified as showing changes in status (behavioral, medical or other) and develop a plan to address the H & S needs of the individual.
6. Typical authority model
7. Problems NM found with system Isolation of knowledge
Direction is Linear
Protection of power
Little communication between authorities
8. New Mexico Model
9. New data collection based on collaboration between authorities Specifics targeted to outcomes
Data that can focus
Technical assistance by the program authority
Information to Medicaid for quality oversight
Providing data that can target Quality Management Audits
Targeted services to consumers that promote health and safety
Problem areas within different regions within the state
Ability to focus technical assistance in a specific region
10. Benefits Collaboration between different Authorities
Cooperative relationship with Adult Protective Service- sharing investigative findings
Develop focused data
Focus direction of change
Information flows out to each layer then back toward the consumer based on system change or technical assistance provided
11. What is the change The structures are really no different
The focus is
As an entity we need to change our focus on data
Take a different approach
Look for stats that will change systems or improve care.
13. Consumers involved in serious incidents with DX of
14. Causes of trips to Emergency Rooms
15. Agreements MOU with Adult Protective services to share information and conduct joint investigations when necessary
Joint Protocol Agreement with Dept. of Health, Human Services Dept., Aging and Long-Term Services Dept., and Children Youth and Families Dept.
Both of the above include holding monthly meetings in each of 5 regions of the state; purpose is discussion consumers and providers as well as systems issues for HCBS and Licensed/Certified facilities.
16. Agreements cont. Quality Steering Committee: looks at quality indicators to address system change. Players at the table:
DDSD
DHI
MAD
As needed other members
ACQ- stakeholders are DOH, MAD, Providers, Consumers. This group assisted with establishment of the Quality indicators in conjunction with HSRI/NCI.
17. Changes to Incident Management as a system No change to the work process of the Bureau
Changes exist in the data accumulated
Changes exist in data presentation to different entities, providing a different look at the information.
Data can afford the authority a better look at needed technical assistance or provider assistance or support for system change