1 / 5

Beam Tilt & TFC: Can we see a (MC) beam tilt?

Beam Tilt & TFC: Can we see a (MC) beam tilt? 1. Plot <b> vs f for different z (barrel) slices 2. Fit to standard form <b> = r*sin( f + f 0 ) + c (here c should be only a cross check.) No offset or tilt: r=0

malory
Download Presentation

Beam Tilt & TFC: Can we see a (MC) beam tilt?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Beam Tilt & TFC: Can we see a (MC) beam tilt? 1. Plot <b> vs f for different z (barrel) slices 2. Fit to standard form <b> = r*sin(f + f0) + c (here c should be only a cross check.) No offset or tilt: r=0 f0 = meaningless A beam offset: r = constant f0 = angle to beam center from x-axis A beam tilt: r = r(z) = mr*z + h f0= angle to beam center from x-axis JDH, STT meeting

  2. <b>, mm B1 B2 B3 f (degrees) B4 B5 B6 r, mm f, rad z, cm b, mm ZH->nnbb no beam tilt 6 for barrels 3 summary no tilt, expect r =0 f = random JDH, STT meeting

  3. <b>, mm B1 B2 B3 f (degrees) B4 B5 B6 r, mm f, rad z, cm b, mm Tilt sample (Lorenzo) x, y=.5 mm/cm so expect mr=.7 mm/cm f=2.35 rad(?) c=0.0 JDH, STT meeting

  4. Tilt sample, again after applying online correction expect mr= 0 mm/cm f= random find, m consistent w/0! Slightly better b JDH, STT meeting

  5. Looks encouraging - see correct tilt using STT trigsim tracks - after applying correction, see expected flat distribution for r(z). - concern: the no-tilt sample gives poor c2 values for both fits. Why? Don’t know, but -> p10 SMT MC problem, fixed in p11 -> bug in my code… - work continues… JDH, STT meeting

More Related