1 / 42

NAMBSE

NAMBSE. EDUCATION CENTRE SLIGO APRIL 28 TH 2010. Admission Policies/Section 29 Appeals Codes of Behaviour/New Guidelines Current Legal Issues David Ruddy BL. Admission/Participation policies Section 29 appeals. Education Act 1998 Section 15(2)(d)

malory
Download Presentation

NAMBSE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NAMBSE EDUCATION CENTRE SLIGO APRIL 28TH 2010

  2. Admission Policies/Section 29 Appeals Codes of Behaviour/New Guidelines Current Legal Issues David Ruddy BL

  3. Admission/Participation policiesSection 29 appeals • Education Act 1998 • Section 15(2)(d) • “A Board shall publish an admissions policy”

  4. Requirements of Education Act • Agreement of patron • Equality • Rights of parents to send child to the school of their choice

  5. Education Welfare Act 2000section 19 • (1)Refusal must be in accordance with the admissions policy • (2)School entitled to be supplied with all relevant information in application form • (3)BoM communicates decision within 21 days

  6. Refusing admission in exceptional circumstances • The student has special needs such that, even with additional resources available from the DES, the school cannot meet such needs and/or provide the student with an appropriate education • Student poses unacceptable risk to other students/staff/school property

  7. Section 29 Appeals against BoM decisions • Expulsion • Suspensions for 20days or more • Refusal to enrol

  8. Westmeath VEC v Sec General DES & Section 29 Appeals Committee High Court 2009 • VEC school refuses enrolment for a “transfer” application • Right of appeal committee to over turn/rewrite admissions policy

  9. St Mologas NS Balbriggan v Sec General DES & Section 29 Appeals Comm High Court 2009 • Appeals Comm no rt to reverse decision of BoM • Not a placement agency • Function to ensure refusal was in accordance with valid enrolment policy

  10. Scoil Mhuire Collcotts V Sec General Des & Section 29 Appeals Committee High Court 2009 • Mainstream and autistic unit • School full/waiting list • No 1 offered only place available • No 4 brings sec 29 appeal & wins • Offer withdrawn from no 1 who brings sec 29 appeal & wins • No 2 brings section 29 appeal & wins • School brings Judicial review/case settled/Des approve additional resources

  11. Lucan Educate Together NS v Sec General DES & Section 29 Appeal Committee High Court • Autism outreach unit • Pre condition in admissions policy • Section 29 appeal • Holds against school-Admission policy /in breach of recent legislation • Issue re-writing admissions policy

  12. Glenageary Killiney NS V Sec General DES & Sec 29 Appeals Comm 2009 • School Full • Non Church of Ireland family challenged refusal to enrol • Section 29 appeal favours parents • School success in High Court action

  13. Mr&Mrs X v a Boys National school Equality Authority 2009 • Boys school & co educ autistic unit • School refuses to enrol non autistic girl • Action for discrimination fails

  14. Codes of Behaviour/ The New Guidelines 2008 • Section 23(3) Education Welfare Act 2000 • National Educational Welfare Board (NEWB) obliged to publish guidelines • Clarifies issues for schools

  15. Implementing & Communicating the Code of Behaviour • Teach pupils the rules • Publish the code in the pupil’s Diary/ journal • Parents requested to sign code as a condition of registration

  16. Murtagh v BOM of St. Emer’s Primary School (High Court & Supreme Court) 1991 • “ Discipline in a school is a matter for the Teachers, Principal, Chairperson of BoM, & the Board itself; not a matter for the courts whose function at most is to ensure that the disciplinary complaint was dealt with fairly”

  17. Responsibility of Board of Management (BOM) • Policy and procedures must be in place for suspensions/expulsions • Pupils/parents aware of the policy • All staff aware of fair procedures

  18. Sanctions • Appropriate to age and development stage of pupil • Should not impact disproportionately on particular groupings i.e. members of the travelling community, special needs pupils and international pupils. • Importance of pupils’ understanding the purpose of sanctions

  19. Special Educational Needs Pupils • The code should be flexible enough to allow for implementation of individual behavioural management plans but, in the case of gross misbehaviour or repeated instances of serious misbehaviour when the safety and duty of care to others is at issue, the code takes precedence.

  20. Mrs A (on behalf of her son B vA Boys National school Equality Authority 2009 Parents of autistic boy fail to prove discrimination by school in relation to discipline

  21. Applying sanctions to misbehaviour outside schoolStudent A and Student B VA Dublin Secondary School High Court 1999 • must be a clear connection with the school and a demonstrable impact on it’s work before code of behaviour applies

  22. The period of suspension • Guidelines recommend the following options/possibilities for BoM • Principal - 3 days • Principal - 5 days (approval of Chairperson) • BoM should put a ceiling of 10 days max in relation to particularly serious incident

  23. Grounds for suspension • Proportionate response to behaviour that is causing concern • Seriously detrimental effect on education of other students • Threat to safety • One single incident of serious misbehaviour may be grounds for suspension

  24. Forms of suspension • Immediate suspension • Automatic suspension • Rolling suspension • Informal or unacknowledged suspension/voluntary withdrawal • Open-ended suspension

  25. Fair procedures based on the principles of natural justice (1) The right to be heard • Rt to know what was alleged misbehaviour • Rt to respond • If possibility of serious sanction, rt to be heard by BoM • Absence of bias

  26. State (Smullen & Smullen) V Duffy 1980 High Court No right to legal representation at BoM meetings

  27. M (a minor suing by his mother and next friend AM)vPrincipal and Board of governors of Good Shepherd Primary SchoolHigh Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Belfast 2003 Principal breaches fairness of procedures

  28. Expulsion • Authority to expel should be reserved for the BoM • This authority should not be delegated • Seek assistance of support agencies • Legal advice

  29. Grounds for expulsion • Behaviour is persistent cause of significant disruption to the learning of others or to the teaching process • Continued presence of pupil constitutes a real and significant threat to safety • Pupil responsible for serious damage to property

  30. Automatic/expulsion for first offence • BoM can impose automatic expulsion for certain prescribed behaviours • Sexual assault • Supplying illegal drugs to other pupils in the school • Actual violence or physical assault • Serious threat of violence against another pupil or member of staff

  31. Expulsion "The Shorts Case" Timothy O Donovan -V- BOM of De la Salle College Wicklow & (Section 29 Appeal Committee) High Court Jan 2009 Judge Hedigan

  32. School Discriminates against pupil "The haircut case“ Mary Knott (on behalf of her son David Knott) V Dunmore Community College January 2009 Equality Officer Decision

  33. Kirpan Case • Total ban on 12 yr old boy wearing kirpan • The school violated an individual’s freedom of religion. Supreme Court of Canada

  34. Mulvey (a minor) v Mc Donagh High Court 2004 • Adopted DES guidelines i.e. bullying definition must be ; • repeated • ongoing • sustained

  35. Cross Referencing • The code of behaviour should not be seen as a stand-alone document • Anti-bullying policy must be part of code • Health and safety statement • Admission/enrolment policy

  36. Time Frame • It is expected that the process of audit and review will be completed by September 2010 • Principal’s role is to lead the audit and review and ensure implementation of the code

  37. Separated parent challenges School policy on p/t meetings A v A Primary School Equality Tribunal 2009

  38. Male teacher fails in discrimination case • James Martin Henderson • v • Board of Management of Scoil Iosagain • Equality Tribunal Decision 2009

  39. Appropriate Dress for Communion Christopher Carr v Gaelscoil Mhanister na Corran Midelton Co Cork Equality Tribunal 2009

  40. Circular 60/99 • Dismissal /suspension of teachers/principal teachers

  41. School Principal dismissed • Gertie Mc Nerney • v • Bom of St.Patrick’s Primary school • Dromard,Moyne.co.Longford • Employment Appeals Tribunal • 2009

  42. HSE V Information Commissioner • High Court 2008 HSE must disclose confidential information given by teachers to social workers

More Related