1 / 18

The Immunological Basis for Disease Dilution

The Immunological Basis for Disease Dilution. Sheena Wheeler Dr. Anna Jolles. RELEVANCE. Many human diseases are transmitted from non-human animals ( Zoonotic diseases) Some species are better at transmitting diseases than others Biodiversity is important to ecosystem services.

malory
Download Presentation

The Immunological Basis for Disease Dilution

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Immunological Basis for Disease Dilution Sheena Wheeler Dr. Anna Jolles

  2. RELEVANCE • Many human diseases are transmitted from non-human animals (Zoonotic diseases) • Some species are better at transmitting diseases than others • Biodiversity is important to ecosystem services

  3. BACKGROUND Disease Dilution: Empirical Findings high biodiversity = reduced risk of disease low biodiversity =increased risk of disease Sin Nombre Virus in Deer Mice (Laurie J. Dizney)

  4. BACKGROUND BIODIVERSITY = = DISEASE Why is the deer mouse good at transmitting disease?

  5. HYPOTHESIS We hypothesize that short-lived species invest less in certain aspects of their immune system, which may make them better at transmitting diseases. Ex: VS.

  6. MY OBJECTIVE • To examine the immune differences between short-lived and long-lived rodent species

  7. METHODS: FIELD • Trap different rodent species throughout Oregon (Sherman and Tomahawk traps) • Collect blood, feces, and ectoparasites from each rodent • Ear tag, measure, weigh and release

  8. TRAPPING LOCATIONS Local Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest Willamette National Forest Steens Mountain Eastern OR

  9. MY OBJECTIVE • To examine the immune differences between short-lived and long-lived rodent species • Determine the differences in white blood cell composition between rodent species.

  10. BACKGROUND • White blood cells (WBC): travel in bloodstream to infected areas and destroy responsible bacteria • Complete Blood Count: • Determine numbersand types of white blood cells (WBC) in an animal • Good general way to see how the immune system of an animal functions BACTERIA WBC

  11. METHODS: LAB • Perform complete blood counts (CBC) on each rodent: • A) White blood cell counts • B) Cell differentiation Lymphocyte Neutrophil Band MonocyteEosinophilBasophil

  12. MY OBJECTIVE • Examine the immune differences between short-lived and long-lived rodent species • Determine the differences in blood cell composition between rodent species. • Evaluate the health of different rodent species via fecal parasite analysis.

  13. METHODS: LAB 1. Fecal Float to examine the types of parasite eggs 2. Fecal McMasters to count the different parasite eggs within the feces

  14. PICTURES

  15. PRELIMINARY RESULTS 1. Complete Blood Counts Table 1: Average and standard deviation of total white blood cells/μl for six species of rodents.

  16. PRELIMINARY RESULTS 2. Fecal Analysis Table 2: Percent of species with fecal parasites and percent of each type of parasite in each species.

  17. WHAT’S NEXT? • Continue data collection of rodents around Oregon • Trap larger/longer lived rodents (beaver, nutria) • Analyze data

  18. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) Undergraduate Research, Innovation, Scholarship and Creativity(URISC) Dr. Anna Jolles Dr. Rhea Hanselmann Dr. Kevin Ahern

More Related