1 / 9

Neutrino Point Source Searches with AMANDA-II m -DAQ

Neutrino Point Source Searches with AMANDA-II m -DAQ. Jim Braun. AMANDA-II complete. 2000. D. Steele: Phys.Rev.Lett.92:071102 2004. 2001. Y.-R. Wang: Phys.Rev.D71:077102 2005. 2002. M. Ackermann: Phys.Rev.D75:102001 2007. 2003. 2004. 2005. Unblinded in 2007 by J. Braun. 2006.

mandek
Download Presentation

Neutrino Point Source Searches with AMANDA-II m -DAQ

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Neutrino Point Source Searches with AMANDA-II m-DAQ Jim Braun

  2. AMANDA-II complete 2000 D. Steele: Phys.Rev.Lett.92:071102 2004 2001 Y.-R. Wang: Phys.Rev.D71:077102 2005 2002 M. Ackermann: Phys.Rev.D75:102001 2007 2003 2004 2005 Unblinded in 2007 by J. Braun 2006 Unblinded in 2007 by J. Braun m-DAQ decommissioned m-DAQ Point Source Searches Would like to combine all years into a reasonably unified final event sample and publish point source result in early 2008 Sample will also be used by John K. and others

  3. Data Filtering • Two main data sets: • 2000-2004: Filtered to L3 (~1G events  ~1M events) with Zeuthen scheme • 2005-2006: Filtered to L3 with UW scheme • Zeuthen and UW filtering very similar • Do not need to refilter to achieve a reasonably uniform event sample

  4. Final Event Sample • Final event samples are significantly different! Zuethen 2000-2004 • Strong likelihood difference cut (downgoing vs. unconstrained) • Strong P_hit smoothness cut • Strong paraboloid error cut • ~1K events/year High Purity UW 2005-2006 • Weaker likelihood difference cut at horizon • Weaker P_hit smoothness cut • Strong paraboloid error cut • Weak direct length cut Maximum sensitivity near horizon

  5. Event Selection • Need a uniform event selection for all years • Non-uniform selection is confusing • Non-uniform selection would tend to combine the undesirable propertiesof both selections • Choose Zeuthen cuts for final event sample • Match 2000-2004 publication • 91% of events from 2005-2006 with Zeuthen cuts are already contained in UW sample

  6. Final Event Sample 6166 Total events in final sample

  7. Normalization • Data normalized to average of Barr et al. and Honda 2006 model atmospheric neutrino predictions • Corrects for uncertainties in MC (e.g. ice properties, OM sensitivity) • Final normalization: 0.901  Ratio of starting/final normalization indicates sample is 97% pure

  8. Final Sample

  9. Final Sample

More Related