Civil Society in Greece: Traditionally Weak, Abruptly Powerful ?

1. Civil Society in Greece: Traditionally Weak, Abruptly Powerful ? AsterisHuliaras Professor Department of Political Science and International Relations University of Peloponnese

3. A strong civil society is positively correlated to • Performance of democratic institutions • Institutional development • Economic activity and growth • Social networks of civil engagement • Collective prosperity

8. Two ‘types’ of civil society • Positive Widespread reciprocal social and economic relationships. Characterized by ‘bridging’ or ‘generalised’ social capital across groups and communities. • Negative Trust only the immediate kin, neighbours and community members. Characterized by ‘bonding’ or ‘particularized’ social capital within the same group or community.

9. Greek Civil Societyis generally considered ‘weak’ • Various empirical studies have shown that the levels of interpersonal trust and trust in institutions are in general much lower in Greece than in other west European countries. • Also nationalist sentiments and negative sentiments towards other national or ethnic groups tend to be relatively to other countries high.

10. Active Citizenship Indicator (Based on the European Social Survey)

13. Why Greek civil society is weak ? Highly interventionist state Dominance of political parties Lack of civic education Highly individualistic social norms Highly materialist attitudes Efficiency of the state Level of corruption • Lower level of economic development • Christian Orthodox culture • Historical development (irregular process of political integration) • Vertical clientelistic networks • Opportunistic political culture • Density of family ties

17. December 2008 riots • A 15-year old student was fatally shot by a police officer. Protest activity by the youth later led into widespread civil unrest. They were probably the worst riots modern Greece has seen. Solidarity clashes followed in many European cities.

21. No obvious message • Damage estimated 130 mn $ • French riots of 2005 • Budapest clashes 2006 • A new era of networked protests (photos and videos were posted online almost in real time)

22. Explanations: • Frustration with democratic politics (especially corruption) • Increase in extra-institutional forms of political participation facilitated by the internet and mobile phones • Very high unemployment rates among the youth (21%) • Lack of other avenues of civic participation • ‘Tradition’ of street politics (memetism) • Vendetta police • Rise of post-materialist values

27. Can the economic crisis strengthen social capital / civil society ? Yes No Strengthens only ‘negative’ social capital: family ties. Increases anti-migrant sentiments. Promotes individualist strategies. Undermines the ability of NGOs to raise funds. • Make citizens question the ‘wisdom’ of the governing elites. Promotes political participation. Encourages new forms of solidarity and civic participation. Undermines traditional norms and values that hinder co-operation.

28. New social cleavages • Clientelism has declined as the main tool of political legitimization • Nationalism(s) is/are on the rise • The Right/Left cleavage is losing its importance • A generation cleavage is becoming more salient • Vertical hierarchies are being replaced by horizontal networks