1 / 14

Inactivity seminar – April 11, 2003

This seminar explores different approaches to addressing the inactivity of disabled individuals in the workforce. It examines existing programs and initiatives, assesses their effectiveness, and proposes potential solutions to increase employment outcomes for this population.

manuelp
Download Presentation

Inactivity seminar – April 11, 2003

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Inactivity seminar – April 11, 2003 Mike Daly Lone Parents, Older Workers and Disability Analysis Division Disabled people - what works??

  2. From earlier discussion of trends, short answer is ‘obviously nothing we have tried so far’ • (Looking at GB evidence – but nobody else has the answer) • Focus on moving from inactivity to employment – also need to reduce flows from employment to inactivity • But what do we mean by ‘works’? • Leads to employment outcomes which are not all dead-weight • Attracts sufficient volumes to make impact on aggregate figures

  3. What have we tried? • Support from specialist Disability Employment Advisers • Mandatory Work Focused Interviews • Rehabilitation/retraining (Work Preparation) • Supported Employment (Workstep) • Individualised support from external Job Broker (New Deal for Disabled People) • Training (through WBLA)

  4. What have we tried (2) • Support in work through Access to Work: • Travel to work; support workers; special aids & equipment; adaptations to premises; communicator support at interview • Temporary wage subsidy - Job Introduction Scheme • Making work pay – Disabled Persons Tax Credit • Encourage part-time work as a stepping stone - Permitted work rules

  5. Generally low numbers • Disability Employment Advisers (DEAs) • 670 DEAs conduct 100,000 interviews per year – but most on JSA rather than incapacity benefits • 18, 000 job entries a year – most of these JSA clients • Jobcentre Plus planning for 7,500 job entries for people on incapacity benefits this year (excluding NDDP jobs)

  6. Low numbers (2) • Work Preparation: • 11,000 starts 2000/2001 • 1,700 job entries recorded (Understates performance significantly) • Workstep • Superseded Supported Employment Programme April 2001 • 24,500 currently on Supported Employment & Workstep • 2,600 starts in the first year of Workstep

  7. Low numbers (3) • NDDP • Since July 2001, over 40,000 starts • Around a third achieve job entries, nearly half sustained • Well below targets – but some brokers at or close to target levels • Originally hoped for 100,000 sustained job entries over 3 years • WBLA take-up by IB clients is low - <5% of total

  8. Low numbers (4) • Access to Work • 20,000 existing beneficiaries • 13,000 new beneficiaries • Two thirds of cases already in work • Job Introduction Scheme • Around 2,000 a year • Disabled Persons Tax Credit • 36,000 currently in receipt • Take-up levels thought to be relatively low • Permitted Work Rules • Too early for findings • But higher take-up than previous ‘therapeutic earnings’ rules

  9. Evidence of effectiveness (1) • Disability Employment Advisers • A quarter in work 6 months after assessment • A third of those said would not have got job otherwise • half of customers were satisfied with their DEA contacts. • Mandatory WFIs • ONE pilots found no evidence of impact • But experience with Lone Parents suggests can have an impact, if we get it right • Early evaluation results suggest we haven’t got it right yet in Jobcentre Plus

  10. Evidence of effectiveness (2) • Work Preparation • Recent work to establish best practice • Mixed messages on effectiveness of provision • 20% in work 13 weeks after – but no estimates of net impact • Workstep • Too early to know how many progress to unsupported employment • This was not a principal aim of previous SEP – nor the only objective of Workstep

  11. Evidence of effectiveness (3) • NDDP • Much too early for overall impact assessments. • Access to Work • Case study approach to estimation of deadweight • Significant deadweight present – but low enough for overall programme to be cost-effective • Job Introduction Scheme • Research suggests some net impact – no hard evidence

  12. Evidence of effectiveness (4) • DPTC • No evidence yet on net impact • Research on Disability Working Allowance suggested not many job entries as a result • But know that financial concerns a significant barrier to return to work • Permitted Work Rules • No evidence that therapeutic work was a stepping stone • Research in progress on PWR

  13. What is the problem? • Most of this has been aimed at those who are closer to the labour market – not at the inactive • Only recently (Jobcentre Plus, NDDP) have we seriously tried to convert ‘want to work’ into ‘looking for work’ • And these measures have been seriously flawed • Piecemeal approach – good reason for thinking measures succeed through interactions

  14. So what would work? • Being tested in IB pilots: • Mandatory WFIs • Some re-design of process – but particularly better training • Additional mandatory WFIs for most new claimants • Access to further caseloading – either Jobcentre Plus or external through NDDP • More consistent/coherent access to other help, such as rehabilitation • Improved financial incentives

More Related