1 / 7

Coordinator : Scott Powell

NASA CMS Algorithm Assessment/Intercomparison Working Group Summary Presentation November 6 th , 2013. Coordinator : Scott Powell

marah-rutledge
Download Presentation

Coordinator : Scott Powell

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NASA CMSAlgorithm Assessment/Intercomparison Working GroupSummary PresentationNovember 6th, 2013 Coordinator: Scott Powell Members: David Baker, Molly Brown, Jim Collatz, Vanessa Escobar, Nancy French, Sangram Ganguly, Daven Henze, Chris Hill, George Hurtt, Christine Kang, Eric Kasischke, Robert Kennedy, Junjie Liu, Steven Pawson

  2. Charge • Document the range of intercomparison activities within each of the primary domains (biomass, flux, oceans). • Identify key gaps where further intercomparison efforts are warranted. • Document effective strategies for intercomparison activities.

  3. Approach • Solicit CMS team input to survey question about intercomparison efforts. • Discussion among Working Group members to document “best-practices” for intercomparison activities.

  4. Results • Documentation of current and anticipated intercomparison efforts by primary domain (Biomass, Flux, Oceans).

  5. Results • Emerging discussion about effective strategies for intercomparisons. • Differences due to data, methods, scale, etc...

  6. Next Steps • Incorporate new Phase II projects into documentation. • Continue to seek project- and domain-level input to finalize documentation. • Continue domain-level discussions on effective strategies for intercomparison activities, especially Flux and Oceans.

More Related