1 / 25

CFMIP II Plans Mark Webb (Met Office Hadley Centre) Sandrine Bony (IPSL) Rob Colman (BMRC)

CFMIP II Plans Mark Webb (Met Office Hadley Centre) Sandrine Bony (IPSL) Rob Colman (BMRC) with help from many others…. CFMIP/ENSEMBLES Workshop Paris, April 2007. Outline. Modelling and Prediction of Climate variability and change. Tentative CFMIP II / AR5 timelines

marcos
Download Presentation

CFMIP II Plans Mark Webb (Met Office Hadley Centre) Sandrine Bony (IPSL) Rob Colman (BMRC)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CFMIP II Plans Mark Webb (Met Office Hadley Centre) Sandrine Bony (IPSL) Rob Colman (BMRC) with help from many others… CFMIP/ENSEMBLES Workshop Paris, April 2007

  2. Outline Modelling and Prediction of Climate variability and change Tentative CFMIP II / AR5 timelines Current plans for various elements of the CFMIP II strategy How you can contribute…

  3. CFMIP II experiments and CMIP4/AR5 experiments Modelling and Prediction of Climate variability and change CFMIP I ran experiments parallel to those in AR4 with enhanced cloud diagnostics (ISCCP simulator) Our strategy for AR5 is to work to have the best diagnostics in the official AR5 simulations and to minimise the number of experiments that CFMIP II needs to run in parallel Even if this effort is successful CFMIP II will still run sensitivity experiments with the AR5 model versions in parallel with the official AR5 experiments

  4. Tentative CFMIP II and CMIP4/AR5 timelines

  5. Strategy for a better assessment of cloud feedbacks in AR5 1/ Develop diagnostic techniques for evaluating clouds and modelled cloud climate feedbacks using satellite data 2/ Develop process level diagnostics to better understand physical cloud- climate feedback mechanisms in models 3/ Work with modelling groups to encourage use of detailed cloud diagnostics in the AR5 experiments 4/ Develop a lightweight experimental framework for studying cloud feedbacks 5/ Run co-ordinated sensitivity experiments to understand the impact of different model assumptions on cloud climate feedbacks 6/ Work with the GCSS/parametrization community to assess the credibility of models’ cloud feedback mechanisms

  6. Strategy for a better assessment of cloud feedbacks in AR5 1/ Develop diagnostic techniques for evaluating clouds and modelled cloud climate feedbacks using satellite data 2/ Develop process level diagnostics to better understand physical cloud- climate feedback mechanisms in models 3/ Work with modelling groups to encourage use of detailed cloud diagnostics in the AR5 experiments 4/ Develop a lightweight experimental framework for studying cloud feedbacks 5/ Run co-ordinated sensitivity experiments to understand the impact of different model assumptions on cloud climate feedbacks 6/ Work with the GCSS/parametrization community to assess the credibility of models’ cloud feedback mechanisms

  7. 1/ Diagnostics for cloud evaluation with satellite data ISCCP cloudcluster evaluation(Williams and Tselioudis, Climate Dynamics 2007)

  8. 1a/ ISCCP simulator development Modelling and Prediction of Climate variability and change Develop use of ‘lightweight’ 2D ISCCP simulator diagnostics for use in clustering studies (Williams, Webb) - daily mean optical depth (albedo weighted) - cloud top pressure - ISCCP TCC Alternative to 42 element tau-Pc histograms This will allow cluster statistics to be collected in long integrations periods without saving/exchanging large volumes of daily data Pilot study/upgrade ISCCP simulator vn 3.5 by end 2007 Modellers upgrade/install by mid 2008?

  9. 1b/ CFMIP CloudSat/CALIPSO simulator development Modelling and Prediction of Climate variability and change Various modules currently under development Met Office Alejandro Bodas, Mark Webb, Mark Ringer IPSL/LMD Marjolaine Chiriaco, Helene Chepfer, Sandrine Bony LLNL Steve Klein, Yuying Zhang CSU John Haynes, Jonny Lyo PNL/UW Roger Marchand Prototype release expected before end 2007 Release of official CFMIPII/AR5 version mid 2008 Modellers may start installation from early 2008 We plan to add the ISCCP simulator as an additional module

  10. Strategy for a better assessment of cloud feedbacks in AR5 1/ Develop diagnostic techniques for evaluating clouds and modelled cloud climate feedbacks using satellite data 2/ Develop process level diagnostics to better understand physical cloud- climate feedback mechanisms in models 3/ Work with modelling groups to encourage use of detailed cloud diagnostics in the AR5 experiments 4/ Develop a lightweight experimental framework for studying cloud feedbacks 5/ Run co-ordinated sensitivity experiments to understand the impact of different model assumptions on cloud climate feedbacks 6/ Work with the GCSS/parametrization community to assess the credibility of models’ cloud feedback mechanisms

  11. 2a/ CFMIP Point diagnostics - point locations including - GPCI (Teixeira et al) - ARM/BSRN/Cloudnet sites - locations where models show largest spread? - locations with largest observed inter-annual sensitivity? - 3hrly or timestep sampling of all cloud diagnostics? - present day and climate change 10-20 years? - pilot study (Met Office and others?)by end 2007 ? - modellers set up in models by mid 2008

  12. 2a/ CFMIP Point diagnostics

  13. 2a/ CFMIP Point diagnostics

  14. 2b/ Cloud condensate tendency analysis (Ogura et al) Correlation coefficient (when positive) ΔCloud water (2xco2 - 1xco2, DJF) Cloud water vs condensation-precip sigma 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.6 1.0 1.0 90S 60S 30S EQ 30N 60N 90N 90S 60S 30S EQ 30N 60N 90N contour=3e-6 [kg/kg] -1 0 1 cloud decrease increase - pilot model inter-comparison (NIES,MetOffice,MPI) end 2007 - modellers set up in models by end 2008

  15. Strategy for a better assessment of cloud feedbacks in AR5 1/ Develop diagnostic techniques for evaluating clouds and modelled cloud climate feedbacks using satellite data 2/ Develop process level diagnostics to better understand physical cloud- climate feedback mechanisms in models 3/ Work with modelling groups to encourage use of detailed cloud diagnostics in the AR5 experiments 4/ Develop a lightweight experimental framework for studying cloud feedbacks 5/ Run co-ordinated sensitivity experiments to understand the impact of different model assumptions on cloud climate feedbacks 6/ Work with the GCSS/parametrization community to assess the credibility of models’ cloud feedback mechanisms

  16. Proposed diagnostics for AR5/CFMIPII experiments

  17. 3/ Working with modellers to include these in AR5/CMIP4 Modelling and Prediction of Climate variability and change The ISCCP simulator is already in most climate models and will be part of standard IPCC diagnostic requirement for AR5 (agreed by WGCM Sep 06) Cloud tendencies are already diagnosed in many models Most groups have submitted data to the WGNE-GCSS GPCI C3S is relatively new, but many groups are interested in making good use of CloudSat/CALIPSO data. Please start to make the case to the relevant people in your organisation for setting up these diagnostics for CFMIP and AR5! If AR5 integrations start in late 2008, then this work will need to be done in the next 18 months.

  18. Strategy for a better assessment of cloud feedbacks in AR5 1/ Develop diagnostic techniques for evaluating clouds and modelled cloud climate feedbacks using satellite data 2/ Develop process level diagnostics to better understand physical cloud- climate feedback mechanisms in models 3/ Work with modelling groups to encourage use of detailed cloud diagnostics in the AR5 experiments 4/ Develop a lightweight experimental framework for studying cloud feedbacks 5/ Run co-ordinated sensitivity experiments to understand the impact of different model assumptions on cloud climate feedbacks 6/ Work with the GCSS/parametrization community to assess the credibility of models’ cloud feedback mechanisms

  19. 4/ Lightweight idealised experimental framework Modelling and Prediction of Climate variability and change Current proposal: - AMIP like present day (June 1984 – Dec 2007 ) - AMIP + CO2 doubling forcing experiment (Hansen) - AMIP + 1% CMIP2 composite SST pattern (Soden) If significant variations on this are proposed then a pilot study will be necessary Proposed timetable: - Pilot study (volunteers?) end 2007 - CFMIP-2 experiments with AR5 versions 2009-2010

  20. Strategy for a better assessment of cloud feedbacks in AR5 1/ Develop diagnostic techniques for evaluating clouds and modelled cloud climate feedbacks using satellite data 2/ Develop process level diagnostics to better understand physical cloud- climate feedback mechanisms in models 3/ Work with modelling groups to encourage use of detailed cloud diagnostics in the AR5 experiments 4/ Develop a lightweight experimental framework for studying cloud feedbacks 5/ Run co-ordinated sensitivity experiments to understand the impact of different model assumptions on cloud climate feedbacks 6/ Work with the GCSS/parametrization community to assess the credibility of models’ cloud feedback mechanisms

  21. 5/ Sensitivity tests to assess impact of model assumptions Modelling and Prediction of Climate variability and change Examples: - Does suppressing cloud liquid water content feedback increase climate sensitivity? - Does using a stability based cloud fraction reduce climate sensitivity? Proposed timetable: - Pilot study (Met Office, MPI, NIES) end 2007 - CFMIP-2 experiments with AR5 versions 2009-2010

  22. Strategy for a better assessment of cloud feedbacks in AR5 1/ Develop diagnostic techniques for evaluating clouds and modelled cloud climate feedbacks using satellite data 2/ Develop process level diagnostics to better understand physical cloud- climate feedback mechanisms in models 3/ Work with modelling groups to encourage use of detailed cloud diagnostics in the AR5 experiments 4/ Develop a lightweight experimental framework for studying cloud feedbacks 5/ Run co-ordinated sensitivity experiments to understand the impact of different model assumptions on cloud climate feedbacks 6/ Work with the GCSS/parametrization community to assess the credibility of models’ cloud feedback mechanisms

  23. 6/ Assess credibility of cloud feedback mechanisms Modelling and Prediction of Climate variability and change Proposals in this area are very much under discussion as part of the GEWEX/GCSS-CFMIP collaboration arrangements, and are less tied to the CMIP4 timetable. Having high frequency point/process diagnostics in AR5/CFMIP-2 will help climate modelling and GCSS/process communities to understand cloud feedbacks mechanisms in models and the reasons for their differences. We need to find ways to bridge the gap between global models and single column/case studies for climate feedback experiments as well as present day. Doing this should allow us to use CRM/LES/SCM studies to assess our relative confidence in the cloud feedbacks shown by different models.

  24. Please give us your feedback…. Modelling and Prediction of Climate variability and change Please take part in our project working groups today – everyone is welcome! We plan to write a concrete project proposal this summer, based on the recommendations from this meeting. The aim is to publish this and send out a call for participation from modelling groups at the end of this year. This will include recommendations for diagnostics to be included in the AR5 experiments, which are expected to be finalised in 2008.

  25. Cloud system composites from Lau & Crane (1995)andKlein and Jakob (1999) TWP

More Related