1 / 17

Lessons Learned in the Translation of IFRS

This study examines the translation process of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and identifies areas for improvement. It aims to promote consistency and understanding of IFRS across different countries.

marcosn
Download Presentation

Lessons Learned in the Translation of IFRS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Lessons Learned in the Translation of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Frédéric Gielen Lead Financial Management Specialist Europe and Central Asia Region THE WORLD BANK

  2. Background • World Bank generally supports the adoption of IFRS by public interest entities (PIEs) in our partner countries, in an effort to promote high quality financial reporting in the corporate sector. • ROSC A&A reports: identified translation issues as a potential impediment to the successful implementation of IFRS

  3. Ultimate Goals • For IFRS to be fully implemented by PIEs in our partner countries, thus contributing to a high-quality financial reporting environment. • For partner countries to have an active role in the standard-setting process, to ensure IFRSs are relevant to their needs.

  4. To better understand the issues faced by countries in translating IFRS. To identify and disseminate good practices in IFRS translation. To suggest improvements, if any, to the IFRS translation process. Objectives of this study

  5. Sources of information Translation Coordinators Translators Review Committee Members Other (ROSC, existing literature, etc.)

  6. Preliminary Findings……

  7. First, some considerations: Mandatory (legal) vs. Voluntary adoption of IFRS Frequency of updates: at regular intervals (i.e., yearly) or as new standards/amendments are issued by IASB Target language: spoken in one country or in several countries (French, Spanish, etc.)

  8. Mandatory vs. voluntary adoption of IFRS Mandatory Voluntary • Mandatory application of IFRS for some reporting entities - country adopts IFRS as national standards (bare standards published in official gazette) • Voluntary application of IFRS by reporting entities (publication of the “bound volume”)

  9. Preliminary Findings: Good Practices (1) Build a database of terms/expressions (containing source language and target language) to promote consistency in translation within and across standards (ex. TRADOS) Ensure database is consistently updated and harmonized

  10. Preliminary Findings: Good Practices (2) Translation of full bound volume, including implementation guidance, bases for conclusion, illustrative examples, etc. is essential Having only the bare standards in local language is not enough to promote a full understanding of the standards, nor ensure their proper application

  11. Preliminary Findings: Good Practices (3) Translations may be undertaken by professional translators, but these must be reviewed by technical experts Need for standards and supporting documents to be reviewed for substance; review process also promotes consistency in terminology

  12. Preliminary Findings: Areas for improvement (1) Review Committee Difficulty in attracting and retaining reviewers: size of review committees has been dwindling  increased the workload for each reviewer Lack of timeto review standards: reviewers are volunteers who need to balance other professional activities with review task

  13. Preliminary Findings: Areas for improvement (2) Standards in English are sometimes unclear (due both the technical as well as stylistic issues) Need for a contact person/group at IASCF/IASB to whom questions regarding the interpretation of standards should be directed.

  14. Preliminary Findings: Areas for improvement (3) Translation of Exposure Drafts and related documentation (bases for conclusion, implementation guidance, etc.) of new standards or amendments generally not carried out Exposure drafts and related documentation need to be translated if all interested parties are to fully participate in the standard-setting process 120 day comment period for Exposure Drafts may not be sufficient to allow for translation

  15. Exposure Drafts: Estimated time for translation & review Translation: 1500-2500 words per day Review: 500-1000 words per hour Example: ED 8: Operating Segments Bare Standard: 7,300 words Basis for Conclusion: 12,900 words Implementation Guidance: 2,000 words Total: 22,200 words ED 8 Translation: 9 -15 business days ED8 Review: 20-45 hours Approximately:

  16. Preliminary Findings: Areas for improvement (4) Other Areas for Improvement Funding: how to fund translations in the absence of external assistance & when sales of bound volumes are not enough? Legal Adoption: errors in translation may result in unintended differences between “gazetted” IFRS and original version, as well as differences between “gazetted” IFRS and translated bound volume.

  17. Research paper will be available for review in June/July 2006. We look forward to presenting our final findings at that time. Thank you

More Related