250 likes | 267 Views
CLASS Keys Orientation. Douglas County School System August 2011. Learning Targets of the Orientation Session. Identify Douglas County School System and our school expectations for teacher evaluation Review the content and process for CLASS Keys Provide time for questions and discussion
E N D
CLASS KeysOrientation Douglas County School System August 2011
Learning Targets of the Orientation Session Identify Douglas County School System and our school expectations for teacher evaluation Review the content and process for CLASS Keys Provide time for questions and discussion Discuss the timeline for completing steps
Douglas County School System • Orientation completed during pre-planning • Self-Assessment completed by August 15 • Draft of Professional Growth Plan completed by August 31 • Pre-Evaluation Conference completed by September 15 • Teacher Evaluation Process* • 2 Informal Observations Required • 1st Completed by October 31 • 2nd Completed by February 28 • 1 Formal Observation Required • Completed by January 31 • Annual Evaluation completed by March 31 *Process is different for At-Risk Teachers and will be discussed privately
CLASS Keys Training Modules Resource for Professional Learning Module 1: Content and Structure (The What?) Module 2: Overview of the Evaluation Process (The How?) Module 3: Self-Assessment and Reflection Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Module 5: Pre-Evaluation Conference Module 6: Informal Observations Module 7: Formal Observations Module 8: GA Teacher Duties and Responsibilities Module 9: Annual Evaluation Module 10: Professional Development Plan S
CLASS Keys Process Guide: 38 Pages Content: What? Process: How? Legal Issues Corresponds to the Blue GTEP Manual Appendix: 42 Pages Resource for Teachers and Administrators Examples, Examples, Examples
Review Introduction to the CLASS Keys Teacher Evaluation System Process Guide Pages 7 – 9
The CLASS Keys Evaluation System is designed to: • Evaluate classroom teachers using qualitative rubrics to assess their instructional practices. • Evaluate classroom teachers on the basis of the academic gains of their students. • Engage teachers in their own assessment and professional growth. • Increase the quantity and quality of feedback that teachers receive from their evaluator(s). • Use an array of evidence collected over time to assess teacher performance and student learning.
STRAND STANDARD ELEMENT ASSESSMENT - The collecting and analyzing of student performance data to identify patterns of achievement and underachievement in order to design and implement appropriate instructional interventions. CONTINUUM OF IMPROVEMENT RUBRIC
Review Three Phases of the CLASS Keys Teacher Evaluation System Process Guide Page 10
Three Phases of the CLASS Keys Process Pre-Evaluation Phase • Element/Strand Evaluation 1 • GTDR Evaluation FEEDBACK • Overall Evaluation 3 • Self Assessment /Reflection CLASS KEYS • Professional Growth Plan • Pre-Evaluation Conference FEEDBACK Annual Evaluation Phase 2 FEEDBACK Evidence Collection Phase • Informal Observations • Formal Observation • Other Evidence Collection
Review CLASS Keys Phase I Steps Process Guide Pages 11 – 17 Examples on Pages 41 – 52
Self Assessment/Reflection: Teachers self-assess and reflect on their performance of the elements. • Professional Growth Plan: Teachers design a PGP to improve their performance on the elements. • Pre-Evaluation Conference: Teachers and evaluators meet to review the PGP, set student achievement goals, and clarify expectations of the elements and duties and responsibilities. 1 Pre-Evaluation Phase
X X X X Module 5: Pre-Evaluation Conference
Review CLASS Keys Phase II Steps Process Guide Pages 19 – 21 Examples on Pages 53 – 60
Informal Observations: Evaluators conduct two, 5 to 15-minute, unannounced classroom observations to assess a few elements. • Formal Observation: Evaluators conduct a 30 to 50-minute announced classroom observation to assess as many elements as possible. • Other Evidence Collection: Evaluators collect evidence from sources such as conferences, meetings, planning and professional learning sessions, examination of student and adult products, etc. 2 Evidence Collection Phase
Review CLASS Keys Phase III Steps Process Guide Pages 23 – 32 Examples on Pages 61 – 80
Element/Strand Evaluation: Evaluators review the evidence collected and score the teacher’s performance on the rubrics. • When the element scores are aggregated, all strands must be scored at least at the EMERGING level. • GTDR Evaluation: The reviewed performance on all duties and responsibilities must be satisfactory to receive an overall SATISFACTORY scoring. • Overall Evaluation: Both sections, the Strands and GTDR, must receive a SATISFACTORY scoring for a teacher to receive a satisfactory annual evaluation. 3 Annual Evaluation Phase
Satisfactory performance is required for both the CLASS KeysStrands and the Georgia Teacher Duties and Responsibilities. + CLASS Keys Strand Scores Georgia Teacher Duties and Responsibilities TEACHER’S ANNUAL EVALUATION