220 likes | 344 Views
National Turkey Federation Annual convention. Caroline Smith DeWaal Food Safety Director, CSPI Feb. 16, 2012 Tampa, Florida. CSPI: Four Decades of Consumer Advocacy. Bi-national consumer advocacy organization founded in 1971 by Michael Jacobson, Ph.D. Focuses on nutrition, health,
E N D
National Turkey Federation Annual convention Caroline Smith DeWaal Food Safety Director, CSPI Feb. 16, 2012 Tampa, Florida
CSPI: Four Decades of Consumer Advocacy • Bi-national consumer advocacy organization founded in 1971 by Michael Jacobson, Ph.D. • Focuses on nutrition, health, and food safety • Publishes award-winning Nutrition Action Healthletter • Represents over 900,000 subscriber/ members in the U.S. and Canada
Charting our Course • New Poultry Inspection System (P.I.S.) • Emerging Pathogens • Performance Standards • FSMA • Safe Meat and Poultry Act • Outbreak Alert!: Results from 1999-2008 for the turkey industry
New Poultry inspection system • Major overhaul of poultry inspection announced last month • Agency stresses that this is not HIMP… • Data on HIMP is less than definitive: • No thorough independent review since 2001 • Testing data show some plants exceed the performance standards; others do not • Clear that the poultry inspection system needs updating: • Goals of new P.I.S: • Decrease risk of foodborne illness • Decrease expenses for government and industry • Focus FSIS inspectors on aspects most related to food safety • Worthy goals, but are these steps the right ones?
The New P.I.S.improvements • Establishment must document plans to prevent: • Carcass contamination by enteric pathogens and fecal material, and to enforce zero tolerance for fecal contamination entering the chill tank. • Establishments must test to validate the effectiveness of those plans. • Establishments must maintain enhanced recordkeeping requirements to document that products meet the definition of ready-to-cook (RTC) poultry. Devil is in the details– some proposed ‘improvements’ need fleshing out before we will know how effective they’ll be.
The new P.I.S.Wait-and-see Mandatory elements (affecting all 289 poultry, non-ratite establishments): • New testing conducted by each facility but the adequacy of testing regime is unclear: no required frequency or target organisms • Removal of previous testing requirements for generic E. coli • Replacement of prescriptive time/temperature chilling with requirement for establishment-developed procedures • Aligned with HACCP, but Agency must review SIP waivers to determine effectiveness of alternative methods
The new P.I.S.Wait-and-see Voluntary elements (affecting those establishments operating under the new P.I.S.): • Reassignment of carcass sorting activities from FSIS - inspector to the establishment • Who sets the standards for sorting? How much discretion do they have? Is there adequate training for sorters? • Line speed changes • Is “stopping the line” a real enforcement tool for inspectors? How frequently do they use it, and do they feel pressured to avoid doing so? • What is the line speed for the company sorter?
RECOGNIZING EMERGING PATHOGENS AND NEW VEHICLES • E. coli O104:H4 sprout outbreak in Europe, summer 2011 • Over 4300 ill, 900+ HUS cases, approx. 50 deaths • S. Heidelberg outbreakin ground turkey in 2011 • 26 states, 136 ill, 37 hospitalizations, 1 death • Listeria monocytogenes cantaloupe outbreak in Colorado, fall 2011 • At least 30 deaths • Ubiquitous, grows at refrigeration temperatures
Antimicrobial Resistant Outbreaks • Mostly Salmonella • Ground beef and unpasteurized dairy products most common sources • Ground turkey – 2 outbreaks in 2011, S. Hadar and S. Heidelberg • Ground beef – 7 outbreaks since 2002, S. Newport and S. Typhimurium
Modernizing Food Law in The United States: Performance Standards • The Food Safety Modernization Act passed Congress and was signed into law on January 4, 2011. • It is the beginning of a longer term effort to modernize the national food safety system. • The legislation has no specific impact on the meat and poultry industries, but there are elements to consider. • The provision on Performance Standards requires consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture to determine the most significant contaminants.
FSMA requirements for Developing Performance Standards New law requires FDA to take a number of steps in setting performance standards: • Determine the most significant foodborne contaminants • Emphasis on contaminants with robust public health data • Pathogen–food category pairing demonstrates the need for good attribution data • Set guidelines or regulations requiring industry controls by product or product classes • Re-evaluate list of significant contaminants every two years; periodically review guidance or regulations
Safe meat & poultry act, s. 1529 If enacted, SMPA would: • Update food safety laws governing the meat and poultry industry to better protect public health through a more integrated food safety system. • Provide the Food Safety and Inspection Service at USDA with statutory direction on managing new and emerging pathogens. • Require FSIS to conduct a public health assessment to improve understanding of the risks associated with meat, poultry and egg products to inform public education and research efforts.
Performance standards Under sMPA • Under this provision, FSIS will have a clearly defined program for determining which pathogens pose the greatest risk to public health and establishing standards that reduce that risk. • A performance standard establishes the degree to which “a step or combination of steps in the production, processing, distribution, or preparation of a food must operate to achieve the required level of control over microbiological contamination.” • A statutory mandate would provide the industry with greater certainty regarding its responsibilities.
Performance standards FSIS is required to: • Conduct a survey to determine current levels of food contamination. • Establish public health goals and objectives. • Define pathogen reduction performance standards that are sufficient to reduce pathogens in food and achieve public health goals and objectives. • To assure the effectiveness of the standards – they are reviewed every three years against the goals and availability of improved controls.
How smpa fits with fsma • The bill complements the recently passed FDA Food Safety Modernization Act; it would establish better targets for pathogen control, stronger surveillance for foodborne diseases, and new traceability and recall authority. • These steps will help reduce the risk of foodborne disease outbreaks, or provide faster detection and response if an outbreak occurs.
Outbreak alert! • CSPI’s database uses outbreak information primarily from the CDC – only analyzing foodborne outbreaks with identified food sources and etiologies. • Between 1999 and 2008, CSPI analyzed 4,742 outbreaks, which caused 120,570 illnesses in the U.S. • The database is updated and reports are published regularly.
Turkey products implicated Most commonly identified foods in CDC’s line-listing: • Turkey – 21 • Roasted turkey – 21 • Smoked turkey – 11 • Baked turkey – 8 • Deli meat, sliced turkey – 10 • Sandwich, turkey – 25 • Turkey, gravy – 8 • Turkey, stuffing – 8
THANK YOU! Caroline Smith DeWaal Food Safety Director Center for Science in the Public Interest 1220 L St., NW Suite 300 Washington, DC 20005 Phone: (202) 777-8364 Fax: (202) 265-4954 E-mail: cdewaal@cspinet.org On the internet: www.cspinet.org and www.safefoodinternational.org