Model Bank Testing Accelerators

1. Model Bank Testing Accelerators “Ready-to-use” test scenarios to reduce effort, time and money.

2. Agenda 1 Business Challenges Model Bank Testing Accelerators 2 3 Model Bank Testing Accelerators Capabilities Model Bank Testing Accelerators Design 4 5 Model Bank Testing Accelerators Coverage 6 Model Bank Testing Accelerators Benefits

3. Business Challenges • As software vendors offer more flexible solutions to their clients, the need for complex testing increases. This is further complicated by the need not just to test applications in isolation but as an integral part of a larger application environment. Bug fixes, patches, new development and upgrades have to be tested end to end across all the involved platforms and systems. This process requires good coordination, tremendous effort, time to execute the test scenarios and large numbers of resources. All of this adds up when looking at the overall cost of testing. • Therefore the use of ready and properly structured test scenarios not only can ensure the completeness of test coverage, but also significantly reduce deployment and testing costs.

4. Model Bank Testing Accelerators Validata SAS has been developed to deliver packaged, enterprise wide solutions, in testing and legacy migration for the financial sector and banking IT professionals. Significant investment has been made in both the development of product functionality and relevant content, re-usable test cases to be packaged and delivered to clients as part of the overall product solution. Our goal from the outset was to optimize reusability across functional, technical and regression testing. Our Model Bank Testing Accelerators will allow us and our partners to jump start our clients’ implementation by having up to 70% of the core Test Cases and Test Steps available immediately testing begins. The reusability of the automated libraries offers real value. From Test Requirements, Test Design, Test Scenarios and scripts to Change Management, we can help your validation efforts. Reusability is the key driver in reducing costs.

5. Utilization of the product features of re-usability Definition of financial objects and mapping to T24 ready for use Test data ready for use with minor changes for client specific setup Reduction in effort in test preparation and quicker times to delivery Automated test result checks Financial test cases built to cover all main banking functions Test cases grouped into logical functions at a granular level to enable selection of relevant functions Model Bank Testing Accelerators Capabilities

6. Model Bank Testing Accelerators Design • To ensure completeness of test coverage, test cases have been designed using the following principles: • Re-usability based on: • Site independence • System Date independence • Currency independence • Exchange and interest rate independence • ‘Four Eyes’ principle of input and authorize • Input, Amend, Reverse and Delete • End to End check steps including limit updates, entry and delivery message generation, General Ledger updates • Verification of SWIFT message output • Checks of interest calculations and currency conversions • Multiple users • Automatic triggered of COB and confirmation of successful completion

7. Model Bank Testing Accelerators Coverage • These test cases provide wide coverage of the functional areas of TEMENOS T24 Model Bank: • Core • Trade Finance and Guarantees • Arrangement Architecture • Wealth Management • SWIFT • Reporting / Accounting • We also provide coverage for Canadian Platform Scenarios Core 1650

8. In depth cover Bank specific products and processes Especially designed execution cycles to meet the needs of each bank, covering daily, monthly and quarterly processing cycles Reduce the effort and cost of testing by 60-70% against testing on a manual basis Test cases based on business workflows and business scenarios Meet testing needs to cover local development Test cases, easy to use for testing through Web, GUI or OFS Increase reusability with available test cases The Critical Differences

9. Effort Overview: Test Creation Phase Systems Integration Testing Continuous Regression Testing Performance Testing Functional Testing Manual 30% Faster on test case creation 60% Faster than manual • Limitations • No Low level testing. • Lack of Knowledge and Complex test transactions and enquiries. • No qualitative test cases. • No reusability -40% Due to Test data and scenarios reusability • With AcceleratorsHighest Automation Required: • Enquires • Advanced Enquiries • Test Data • Automatic Business Rules • Comparison Rules 70% less effort by reusing the test artifacts from SIT • Highest Automation Required: • Enquires • Advanced Enquiries • Comparison Rules • Automatic Business Rules 60% less effort by reusing the test artifacts from SIT • Highest Automation Required: • Automatic Business Rules

10. Effort Overview: Test Execution Phase Systems Integration Testing Continuous Regression Testing Performance Testing Functional Testing Manual 60% Faster on every cycle 70% Faster in any cycle 80% Faster on every cycle Same Effort for all Cycles Cycle 1 Cycle 1 Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Cycle 2 Cycle 2 Cycle 3 Cycle 3 No comparison to manual as it is only automatic Cycle 3 Cycle 4 Cycle 4

11. ROI based on re-usability COS T $$ % Reusability Run MTC Automation Design COS T $$ % Reusability % Reusability COS T $$ Run MTC Test Case Creation Automation Design Run MTC Automation Design Test Case Creation On boarding Test Case Creation Infrastructure Infrastructure Infrastructure Automation – RUN 3 Automation - RUN 2 Automation – RUN 1

12. ? Do You Have Any Questions? ? ? We would be happy to help.