1 / 21

ECAL in CRUZET

ECAL in CRUZET. CRUZET Data Analysis Jamboree 30 May 2008 Toyoko Orimoto California Institute of Technology On behalf of the ECAL prompt feedback group. ECAL Prompt Feedback Group. T. Orimoto, A. Bornheim (Caltech) K. Kaadze (KSU) S. Chang (Uni. Kyungpook) J. Fay (IPNL Lyon)

margaret-greene
Download Presentation

ECAL in CRUZET

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ECAL in CRUZET CRUZET Data Analysis Jamboree 30 May 2008 Toyoko Orimoto California Institute of Technology On behalf of the ECAL prompt feedback group T. Orimoto, ECAL in CRUZET

  2. ECAL Prompt Feedback Group • T. Orimoto, A. Bornheim (Caltech) • K. Kaadze (KSU) • S. Chang (Uni. Kyungpook) • J. Fay (IPNL Lyon) • F. DeGuio, P. Govoni (Uni Milano/INFN) • S. Cooper, J. Haupt, J. Zhang, V Rekovic (Uni. Minnesota) • P. Paganini (LLR) • A. Palma, C. Doglioni (Uni. Rome/INFN) • N. Cartiglia, A. Gozzelino, S. Oggero (Uni Torino/INFN) • And others have joined since CRUZET! T. Orimoto, ECAL in CRUZET

  3. ECAL in CRUZET • Since CRUZET, have processed all good ECAL cosmics events.. 24M! • ECAL barrel fully readout for most of the time, 36/36 supermodules • Aside from some LV issues, ECAL readout has been clean through CRUZET • Successful “prompt” analysis • By Friday of CRUZET, had analyzed ~14M events. • Now continuing with further analysis of CRUZET data: • Cosmics analysis, now starting to look at track association with muon system • Analysis of high energy events • Study of problematic channels • Laser data analysis • Cosmic intercalibration with CRUZET statistics T. Orimoto, ECAL in CRUZET

  4. Cosmics in ECAL: Event Displays DT hits • Run 43566, Event 37324 • Triggered by DT • High Energy Event: 288 GeV in one cluster of 25 crystals 288 GeV Cluster, 25 xtals Reco Track T. Orimoto, ECAL in CRUZET

  5. Cosmics in ECAL: Event Displays 16 GeV Cluster 17 xtals • Run 43588, Event 121626 • Triggered by ECAL & DT • More event displays: http://test-cruzetvisualization.web.cern.ch/test-CRUZETVisualization/ 1 GeV Cluster HCAL (with E cut of 1 GeV) T. Orimoto, ECAL in CRUZET

  6. Cosmics selection in ECAL • Cosmic selection, based on clusters: • 1 xtal with >135 MeV or two neighboring xtals with > 45 MeV each • Then take the 5x5 of the crystals and build a Basic Cluster. • Efficiency of cosmic cluster selection is ~14% • Cluster energy spectra (All plots are for 24M events analyzed, unless otherwise specified) Energy to 200 GeV T. Orimoto, ECAL in CRUZET

  7. Masked TT EB+ (Maximum forced to 2x102 ) HV prob EB- BOTTOM TOP ECAL Cosmic Occupancy Looking at the promptly-produced offline processing, HV issue was noticed and subsequently fixed.. S. Cooper, J. Haupt, T. Orimoto T. Orimoto, ECAL in CRUZET

  8. ECAL Cosmic Occupancy with L1 • Occupancy for events which pass “cosmic” selection, also selecting on L1 bits. • Inclusive Trigger (no requirement on other subsystem trigger) ECAL Trigger RPC Trigger DT Trigger T. Orimoto, ECAL in CRUZET

  9. Track Association Coming soon. S. Cooper, F. DeGuio, C. Doglioni, T. Orimoto T. Orimoto, ECAL in CRUZET

  10. High Energy Events • ~5k clusters w/ E>10 GeV (~100 clusters w/ E>200GeV) • Possible sources: • Showering muons • Muon catastrophic Bremsstrahlung • Deep inelastic scattering • Created “high energy” skim to collect events which contain at least one cluster with E>10 GeV • Show here: • Occupancy of high E clusters • Num of xtals in high E clusters (Basic Clusters, so max is 25. Average is 16 xtals.) • Further analysis ongoing C. Doglioni, A. Gozzelino S. Oggero, T. Orimoto T. Orimoto, ECAL in CRUZET

  11. ECAL Timing Mean timing (pulse peak position - 6) in modules in (iphi,ieta), for events which pass cosmic selection (TT binning) Bottom later Top earlier S. Cooper, J. Haupt, T. Orimoto T. Orimoto, ECAL in CRUZET

  12. ECAL Timing • ECAL signal: 10 samples, 3 pedestal, ideally peak is at 6th sample • Timing = pulse peak position - 6 • Divided by trigger type: “Exclusive” trigger (no trigger from other systems) ECAL triggered Mean 1.5 RMS 1.0 ALL events Mean 0.54 RMS 0.70 (Timing throughout CRUZET, close to optimal) Confirm HCAL: ECAL is 2 clocks off RPC triggered Mean 0.9 RMS 0.5 DT Triggered Mean 0.4 RMS 0.7 S. Cooper, J. Haupt, T. Orimoto T. Orimoto, ECAL in CRUZET

  13. ECAL Timing • Run 43637: at end of CRUZET, with GT latency set to correct for ECAL timing… Moved 2 bunch crossings so ECAL is aligned Timing for run 43637, after correction: Timing for earlier run 43431: Mean = 0.4 RMS = 0.6 Mean = 1.7 RMS = 0.6 ECAL timing looks much better now. S. Cooper T. Orimoto, ECAL in CRUZET

  14. ECAL Laser Data in Gap Sequence Laser timing by xtal • First successful laser data in gap event sequence • Run 43625:34 SM • Timing from laser data: • 50ns overall scale. <1ns variance inside TT, ~15ns variance between SMs • Intra SM spread -- can be corrected • Pattern of 2 SMs.. (still to be understood) Red: corrected for differences in laser cable lengths Time of pulse peak vs FED.TT T. Orimoto, ECAL in CRUZET J. Haupt

  15. ECAL Laser Data: Timing • Correct intra-SM differences in timing in cosmic data, using laser data • Compute average timing for each SM & compute difference between each TT in SM and the average… then correct cosmic data with these correction factors Before laser correction After laser correction T. Orimoto, ECAL in CRUZET J. Haupt

  16. ECAL Problematic Channels • Problematic channels list produced using information about known hardware problems, as well as “hot” channels seen during and since GRUMM with cosmic and pedestal data (channel status map now in DB) • Dedicated analyses deployed to study “problematic” channels not previously seen Reconstructed amplitudes (weights method) w/ and w/o masked channels: Clearly noisy areas, still to be fully understood… C. Doglioni, A. Palma T. Orimoto, ECAL in CRUZET

  17. ECAL Trigger Primitives • Study was done on the trigger occupancy from ECAL trigger primitives (P. Paganini). This led to a list of trigger towers to be masked. With this in place, a top-bottom coincidence ECAL trigger was deployed (1Hz when threshold set to 250 MeV). • Something from Pascal? T. Orimoto, ECAL in CRUZET

  18. Conclusions • Cosmic analysis. All data available as of last night processed. Already closely investigating trigger and instrumental patterns. • High energy events: several k of > 10GeV clusters.. Study ongoing. • ECAL trigger: top-bottom coincidence deployed • ECAL timing: Shifted 2 BX, now looks OK. Studies with laser timing. • Laser: Successful laser data taking in gap event sequence • Cosmic Intercalibration with CRUZET data: Analysis started… • More plots, linked from our PFG wiki pages: http://cern.ch/cmsccecal • Getting ready for CRUZET-II: blah blah blah Grateful to ECAL P5-commissioning and DAQ teams for helpful discussions! T. Orimoto, ECAL in CRUZET

  19. Zero Suppression of ECAL After considering feedback from GRUMM, zero-suppression threshold of 7 (1.75 ADC counts) applied throughout CRUZET Fraction of digis with amp >= emulated 0-supp threshold ZS=7 (1.75 ADC counts) Amplitudes reco’d with weights method A. Palma T. Orimoto, ECAL in CRUZET

  20. ECAL Triggering history • run 43307: only ECAL triggers with EB-, single EM trigger TT theshold=20 • run 43308: only ECAL triggers with EB+, single EM trigger TT theshold=20 • after run 43308: muons trigger only • run 43431 and later: muon triggers+ECAL triggers with top-bottom configuration. TT threshold=25 • run 43488 and later: muon triggers+ECAL triggers with top-bottom configuration. TT theshold=20 • run 43545: only ECAL triggers with top-bottom configuration. TT threshold=20 • run 43547: HCAL provides the trigger with a top-bottom configuration • run 43548: only ECAL triggers with top-bottom configuration. TT threshold=25 • later runs: same as 43548+muon triggers T. Orimoto, ECAL in CRUZET

  21. Triggering Scheme RPC near side, YB0 & YB1 DT = all wheels; 3.or.4.or.5.or.9.or.10.or.11; at least 2 chambers ECAL = EB+.or.EB-; (5.or.6)&(14.or.15) RPC = YB0.or.YB1; 10.or.11.or.12.or.1.or.2.or.3; at least 3 rolls CSC =ME1+,4+; almost all chambers T. Orimoto, ECAL in CRUZET

More Related