320 likes | 552 Views
Wandering Science: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations. Donna Algase, PhD, RN, FAAN. FGSA Josephine M. Sana Professor of Nursing University of Michigan School of Nursing. Focus of Presentation. What is wandering? Theoretical and operational approaches What are the outcomes of wandering?
E N D
Wandering Science: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations Donna Algase, PhD, RN, FAAN. FGSA Josephine M. Sana Professor of Nursing University of Michigan School of Nursing
Focus of Presentation What is wandering? Theoretical and operational approaches What are the outcomes of wandering? Empirical findings What explains wandering? Theoretical models and empirical evidence
Early Definitions Aimless or purposeless walking Increased amount of walking Snyder et al., 1978 Monsour& Robb, 1982
NANDA Definition meandering, aimless, or repetitive locomotion that exposes a person to harm and frequently is incongruent with boundaries, limits, or obstacles. NANDA, 1999
Locomotion as a Rhythm Not walking Phase • MOTION TIME Walking Phase CYCLE
Dimensions of Wandering Frequency Pattern Boundary transgressions Navigational deficits Temporal aspects Pattern Frequency
Proposed Standardized Definition a syndrome of dementia-related locomotion behavior having a frequent, repetitive, temporally-disordered, and/or spatially-disoriented nature that is manifested in lapping, random, and/or pacing patterns, some of which are associated with eloping, eloping attempts, or getting lost unless accompanied. Algase, Moore, Vande Weerd & Gavin-Dreschnack, 2006
Wandering Outcomes Falls, fractures and injuries Elopement Victimization Weight loss Early institutionalization Premature mortality Higher caregiver burden
Need-Driven, Dementia-compromised Behavior (NDB) Model (Algase, Beck, Kolanowski, et al., 1996) Background Factors Wandering Proximal Factors
Background Factors Neurocognitive factors memory, attention, language, visual-spatial skills circadian rhythm motor ability Health Status Socio-Demographics gender, occupation personality, behavioral response to stress
Proximal Factors Physiological need states hunger, thirst, elimination, pain, fatigue Affective states depression, apathy, anxiety, euphoria, irritability Physical environment light, noise, temperature, humidity, complexity of design Social environment staff mix and stability, ambiance, social engagement, crowding
Tested Interventions Subjective barriers Walking, exercise and other activities Specialized environments Behavioral techniques Music Alarms
Subjective Barriers Includes camouflage, visual barriers, and floor grids Capitalizes on visual-spatial distortions, agnosia Quality of evidence varies Effective in some cases, severely impaired, AD only? Tested in residential facilities only
Exercise, Walking & Activities Some benefits reported, but studies too flawed to draw valid inferences Insufficient description of targeted population Tested in residential facilities only
Specialized Environments Types of environments varies; secured wards and nature/homelike areas Outcomes differed by type of environment Studies lacked theoretical underpinning to explain success Examined in residential facilities only
Behavioral Interventions Compelling results for reducing unwanted wandering Ideal reinforcement schedules unknown Consistency of approach may be unfeasible to implement with low staff to patient ratios Worth further evaluation, esp. in community/home contexts for specific wandering behaviors
Alarms Used to deter exit attempts Effective for reducing attempts Verbal versus aversive alarms have greater appeal May have applicability in home settings, especially as technology advances
Complementary/Alternative Therapies Hand/foot massage have been tested; acupuncture testing in progress Massage effective in the short run for agitation; impact on wandering unknown
Pattern as a Basis for Intervention: Random Wandering To interrupt/stop active random wandering: To reduce or prevent active random wandering: Distraction Social engagement Small group or 1:1 activity Calm, but engaging milieu
Pattern as a Basis for Intervention:Lapping To interrupt/stop active lapping: To reduce or prevent lapping: - Redirection Frequent rest periods Other, more comfortable repetitious activity
Pattern as a Basis for Intervention:Pacing To interrupt/stop pacing: To reduce or prevent pacing: Address underlying concern, not behavior Stress reduction techniques Reassurance, trust-building Anticipate needs; reduce eliminate known concerns
Trial and Error Individualized approach based on behavior log Context analysis Eliminate cause/precipitant
General Goals for Treatment and Intervention Assuring safety Using preserved skills Supporting abilities Enabling functional navigation Maximizing comfort and ease Minimizing restriction
Assuring Safety Enroll in “Safe Return” Deter elopement Enhance lighting Remove hazards from the environment Provide a balance/rhythm in the level and timing of stimulation
Using Preserved Skills Encourage the person to do what they are able to do Provide progressive support matched to ability: remind, guide, assist, do for Provide orientation through cuing, signage, landmarks
Supporting Abilities Ensure adequate hydration and nutrition Prevent exhaustion Support circadian rhythm Preserve skin integrity Monitor effects of prescribed medications
Comforting Establish a working way to communicate Build trust Engage the person in meaningful, structured, supervised activity that provides sensory stimulation Create regular opportunity for 1:1 communication at the person’s level of comprehension Preserve elements of previous meaningful life activities Create environments that are engaging, but not over-stimulating
Navigating Provide redundant cueing Decorate with relevant personal items and photo identification Keep desired areas in view; obscure line of vision to undesirable locations Display orienting information in multiple prominent places Use rooms for a single clear purpose
Minimizing Restrictions Provide for flexibility within a larger structure Simplify challenges Lower performance expectations Reserve chemical and physical restraint as a last, if ever, resort
Suggested Practice Standards Establish a clear goal for intervening Use empirically-based interventions with caution Balance safety and autonomy Aim interventions to modify wandering only when it is problematic for the wanderer Be systematic in targeting known or suspected causes of an individual’s wandering Individualize strategies using case-study methodology