AN INTRODUCTION TO PSYCHOLOGICAL TYPE

1. AN INTRODUCTION TO PSYCHOLOGICAL TYPE SEMINAR SCHEDULE 10:00AM INTRODUCTIONS 10:15 Part 1: OVERVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGICAL TYPE 12:00-12:45 LUNCH BREAK 12:45-2:00PM Part 2: COUNSELING APPLICATIONS HAVING TROUBLE WITH AUDIO/VIDEO/USING GO TO MEETING? CALL THEIR SUPPORT NUMBER 1-888-646-0014. THEY ARE SPEEDY WITH HELP AND USER-FRIENDLY.

2. WHAT TO TRY IF YOU CAN’T SEE OR HEAR THE VIDEOS I AM STREAMING FROM GO TO MEETING. STEP 1: DOWNLOAD THE SLIDES I SENT EARLIER THIS WEEK. MOVE TO THE SLIDE I AM DISCUSSING. STEP 2: CLICK ON THE VIDEO LINK ON THE SLIDE. THE YOU TUBE VIDEO SHOULD OPEN AND PLAY ON YOUR COMPUTER. BE SURE TO MUTE YOUR MICROPHONE WHILE DOING THIS.

3. CONFIDENTIALITY YOU WILL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO SHARE PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOURSELF DURING THIS SEMINAR. AS THE SEMINAR IS BEING RECORDED, SHARE ONLY INFORMATION THAT YOU DON’T MIND BEING RECORDED. DURING PART 2 OF THIS SEMINAR I WILL TURN THE RECORDING OFF WHILE DOING A DEMONSTRATION OF HOW TO CONDUCT A PSYCHOLOGICAL TYPE INTERVIEW SO THAT MORE PERSONAL SHARING MAY OCCUR. AAMFT ETHICAL GUIDELINES REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY WILL APPLY TO PERSONAL INFORMATION SHARED.

4. ICEBREAKER WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER TO BE YOUR GREATEST STRENGTHS AS A PERSON? RECENT EXAMPLE OF THAT?

5. AN INTRODUCTION TO PSYCHOLOGICAL TYPE Dr. Carl Jung One of the most important of Jung's longer works, and probably the most famous of his books, Psychological Types appeared in German in 1921 after a "fallow period" of eight years during which Jung had published little. He called it "the fruit of nearly twenty years' work in the domain of practical psychology," and in his autobiography he wrote: "This work sprang originally from my need to define the ways in which my outlook differed from Freud's and Adler's. In attempting to answer this question, I came across the problem of types; for it is one's psychological type which from the outset determines and limits a person's judgment.”

6. Jung on his Childhood and Parentshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTBs-2cloEI

7. The Myers-Briggs Type Inventory (MBTI) Katharine Cook Briggs Isabel Briggs Myers 1962 “ Isabel Briggs Myers (October 18, 1897 - May 5, 1980) was a psychological theorist who researched personality theory with her mother, Katharine Cook Briggs (1875 - 1968). Katharine's interest in personality theory was born when she read a book by Carl Jung in 1923. Katharine shared her findings with Isabel and together they created an inventory. They both had a passion for understanding human development and a desire to make personality theory accessible to everyone in a practical way.” http://www.mypersonality.info/personality-types/isabel-briggs-myers-katharine-cook-briggs/ MBTI (Form M) https://www.cpp.com/en/mbtiproducts.aspx?pc=11

8. OTHER ASSESSMENTS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL TYPE Humanmetrics Jung Typology Test http://www.humanmetrics.com/hr/jtypesresult.aspx The Keirsey Temperament Sorter (KTS II) http://keirsey.com/sorter/register.aspx

9. EXTRAVERSION INTROVERSION + SOCIALIZER - MONOPOLIZER +CONTEMPLATOR - RECLUSE THE ATTITUDES

10. Example: Introvert vs Extravert Hile Rutledge on E vs I https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1t-bHN6Ld8 Introvert vs Extravert https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMJJUqiRzZE The Introvert Advantage https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4NHslIFRWas Being an Introvert in College https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MuVfIBkkMB8 10 Signs you are an introvert https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZKttOPueeY 10 Awkward moments Introverts experience https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0YUCJayZvA 10 Awkward moments experienced by Extraverts https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdPsB9QzCrs Parenting implications https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OyyZuqnnjxw O/B TV EXAMPLE

11. THERAPIST EXAMPLES INTROVERT THERAPISTS CARL JUNG CARL ROGERS EXTRAVERT THERAPISTS VIRGINIA SATIR FRITZ PERLS

12. SENSING INTUITION + REALIST - NITPICKER +VISIONARY - ABSENT-MINDED THE MENTAL FUNCTIONSPERCEIVING

13. Example: Sensing Type vs Intuitive Type S vs. N Conversation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbUzpqrqBJc Jung on Intuition https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_7DpbJ1xFg Sensing vs Intuition at the Museum https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3y0BuHJoFo OUT OF GAS EXAMPLE

14. THERAPIST EXAMPLES SENSING THERAPISTS B.F. SKINNER JUDITH BECK INTUITIVE THERAPISTS HARRY APONTE ART MARTINEZ

15. THINKING FEELING +TOUGH-MINDED - CRITIC +HARMONIZER - ABDICATOR THE MENTAL FUNCTIONSJUDGING

16. Example: Thinking Type vs Feeling Type Dr. Pat Allen https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWuGOU1GMR4 Hile Rutledge https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QnQD-3pBhF8 T vs F Who’s Who https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWGXhnlUW_Y Data’s Best L:ine https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3y0BuHJoFo Leonard’s Mother https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTI0eF-WuMA KONA EXAMPLE

17. THERAPIST EXAMPLES THINKING THERAPISTS ALBERT ELLIS INSOO KIM BERG FEELING THERAPISTS VIOLET OAKLANDER THOMAS PARHAM

18. THE DOMINANT FUNCTION JUDGING PERCEIVING +ORGANIZER - AUTOCRAT +SEEKER - INDECISIVE

19. Example: Judging Type vs Perceiving Type • Judging and Perceiving Who’s who https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_pL-Us_0nA Dr. Pat Allen https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIlCvQccaoU Phoebe and the Wedding Planner https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHB3llXZZNk DELI EXAMPLE

20. THERAPIST EXAMPLES JUDGING THERAPISTS SALVADOR MINUCHIN MARSHA LINEHAN PERCEIVING THERAPISTS CLOE MADANES CARL WHITAKER

21. Jung on his own Psychological Type https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsnDmXU4d8k

22. The 4 Temperaments:NF (Idealist), NT (Rational), SP (Artisan), SJ (Guardian) Keirsey Temperament Sorter www.keirsey.com Dr. Pat Allen (14) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrdZI3vJFPg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2z67HLV4ls Rick Edwards, LPCC Working with Introverted Children https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dsOpnAROe4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7bMo9l81mQ

23. Cognitive Styles Inventory http://www.personalitypathways.com/type_inventory.html

24. Exercise: Identifying Another Person’s Psychological Type Carl Rogers and Gloria https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHxl5NtcDow Gloria ENFP Rogers INFP Note: Person-Center Therapy = INFP approach

25. Example #1: A Psychological Type Intervention with a Family Sister ESFP Artisan Self INFJ Idealist Father ISTJ Guardian Mother ENFJ Idealist

26. EXAMPLE #2: A PSYCHOLOGICAL TYPE INTERVENTION WITH A COLLEGE STUDENT EXPERIENCING DISCRIMINATION* THE PSYCHOLOGICAL TYPE MOST SUSCEPTIBLE TO BEING DISCRIMINATED AGAINST: INFP I- REMAINING SILENT IN THE FACE OF DISCRIMINATION N- NOT NOTICING MICROAGGRESSIONS F- AVOIDING CONFRONTATION WITH THE OPPRESSOR P- PARALYZED BY UNCERTAINTY *Gerrard, B. (2008). A Case Study Suggesting the Use of Psychological Type to Reduce Discrimination in Organizations. Journal of Psychological Type, 68 (3), 19-27.

27. THE PSYCHOLOGICAL TYPE LEAST SUSCEPTIBLE TO BEING DISCRIMINATED AGAINST: ESTJ E+ SPEAKING OUT ABOUT THE DISCRIMINATION S+ RECOGNIZING A MICROAGGRESSION T+ CONFRONTING AN OPPRESSOR J+ DECIDING TO ACT SWIFTLY

28. TYPE DEVELOPMENT: THE PSYCHOLOGICAL TYPE APPROACH TO THERAPY/CHANGE • STRENGTHEN YOUR CHALLENGED FUNCTIONS e.g. For an INFP ESTJ

29. 2. USE YOUR TYPE STRENGTHS MORE EFFECTIVELY TO ADDRESS A PROBLEM e.g. I+ REFLECTING ON PERSONAL STRENGTHS N+ INTUITING A DISCRIMATORY ACT F+ SEEKING PERSONAL SUPPORT P+ PROBLEM-SOLVING DIFFERENT SOLUTIONS

30. THE CASE OF THE PROFESSOR WHO WOULD NOT SEE “I’M REALLY HAPPY YOU ARE HERE. I ONCE HAD A BLIND STUDENT IN ANOTHER CLASS, AND I WASN’T SURE IF SHE WAS GOING TO DO WELL, BUT SHE DID GREAT!” “BETH’S BEING HERE IS MAKING IT DIFFICULT FOR ME TO TEACH THE WAY I USUALLY DO. IT IS TOO TIME CONSUMING AND STRESSFUL TO SEND MATERIALS FOR HER BRAILLE TYPING TO THE DISABILITY OFFICE.” “BETH HOW ARE YOU KEEPING TRACK OF WHO PAID FOR THE TAKE-OUT FOOD?” “IT’S TOO EXPENSIVE AND TIME-CONSUMING TO USE THE USUAL EXAM FORMAT WITH BETH.”

31. BETH: INFP NATHAN: ESFJ STRATEGY: • COACHING/ROLEPLAY WITH BETH ON HOW TO CONFRONT NATHAN (STRENGTHENING BETH’S EXTRAVERSION AND THINKING) • THE CONFRONTATION: A) POSITIVE COMMENT (NATHAN AS FEELING TYPE) B) CONCRETE EXAMPLE (NATHAN AS SENSING TYPE) PRINCIPLE: “TALKING IN TYPE” 3. CONFRONTATION ON THE PHONE (LEVEL PLAYING FIELD)

32. HOW TO CONDUCT A PSYCHOLOGICAL TYPE RELATIONSHIP ANALYSIS STEP 1: TEACH THE CLIENT ABOUT PSYCHOLOGICAL TYPE STEP 2: TOGETHER WITH THE CLIENT IDENTIFY THE CLIENT’S PSYCHOLOGICAL TYPE AND THE SIGNIFICANT OTHER’S PSYCHOLOGICAL TYPE RELATIVE TO EACH OTHER

33. EXAMPLE: RELATIONSHIP TYPE ANALYSIS EXTRAVERSION ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ INTROVERSION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SENSING ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ INTUITION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THINKING ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ FEELING 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 JUDGING ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ PERCEIVING 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

34. EXAMPLE: RELATIONSHIP TYPE ANALYSIS EXTRAVERSION ___ _O_ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ _B_ ___ INTROVERSION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SENSING ___ _O_ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ _B_ ___ INTUITION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THINKING ___ _O_ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ _B_ ___ FEELING 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 JUDGING _O_ ___ ___ ___ _B_ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ PERCEIVING 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 BRIAN INFJ OLIVE ESTJ

35. THE CONCEPT OF RELATIVE TYPE EXTRAVERSION _A_ ___ ___ ___ _B_ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ INTROVERSION A and B are both Extraverts. The doorbell rings. Who is more likely to answer the door? Teaching Point: B functions as a Perceiving type relative to A.

36. STEP 3: DETERMINE FIT OF TYPE TABLE DESCRIPTION FOR EACH PERSON

37. The Sixteen Types at a Glance By Charles Martin, Ph.D. ISTJ For ISTJs the dominant quality in their lives is an abiding sense of responsibility for doing what needs to be done in the here-and-now. Their realism, organizing abilities, and command of the facts lead to their completing tasks thoroughly and with great attention to detail. Logical pragmatists at heart, ISTJs make decisions based on their experience and with an eye to efficiency in all things. ISTJs are intensely committed to people and to the organizations of which they are a part; they take their work seriously and believe others should do so as well. ISFJ For ISFJs the dominant quality in their lives is an abiding respect and sense of personal responsibility for doing what needs to be done in the here-and-now. Actions that are of practical help to others are of particular importance to ISFJs. Their realism, organizing abilities, and command of the facts lead to their thorough attention in completing tasks. ISFJs bring an aura of quiet warmth, caring, and dependability to all that they do; they take their work seriously and believe others should do so as well. INFJ For INFJs the dominant quality in their lives is their attention to the inner world of possibilities, ideas, and symbols. Knowing by way of insight is paramount for INFJs, and they often manifest a deep concern for people and relationships as well. INFJs often have deep interests in creative expression as well as issues of spirituality and human development. While the energy and attention of INFJs are naturally drawn to the inner world of ideas and insights, what people often first encounter with INFJs is their drive for closure and for the application of their ideas to people's concerns. INTJ For INTJs the dominant force in their lives is their attention to the inner world of possibilities, symbols, abstractions, images, and thoughts. Insight in conjunction with logical analysis is the essence of their approach to the world; they think systemically. Ideas are the substance of life for INTJs and they have a driving need to understand, to know, and to demonstrate competence in their areas of interest. INTJs inherently trust their insights, and with their task-orientation will work intensely to make their visions into realities.

38. ISTP For ISTPs the driving force in their lives is to understand how things and phenomena in the real world work so they can make the best and most effective use of them. ISTPs are logical and realistic people, and they are natural troubleshooters. When not actively solving a problem, ISTPs are quiet and analytical observers of their environment, and they naturally look for the underlying sense to any facts they have gathered. ISTPs do often pursue variety and even excitement in their hands-on experiences. Although they do have a spontaneous, even playful side, what people often first encounter with them is their detached pragmatism. ISFP For ISFPs the dominant quality in their lives is a deep-felt caring for living things, combined with a quietly playful and sometimes adventurous approach to life and all its experiences. ISFPs typically show their caring in very practical ways, since they often prefer action to words. Their warmth and concern are generally not expressed openly, and what people often first encounter with ISFPs is their quiet adaptability, realism, and "free spirit" spontaneity. INFP For INFPs the dominant quality in their lives is a deep-felt caring and idealism about people. They experience this intense caring most often in their relationships with others, but they may also experience it around ideas, projects, or any involvement they see as important. INFPs are often skilled communicators, and they are naturally drawn to ideas that embody a concern for human potential. INFPs live in the inner world of values and ideals, but what people often first encounter with the INFP in the outer world is their adaptability and concern for possibilities. INTP For INTPs the driving force in their lives is to understand whatever phenomenon is the focus of their attention. They want to make sense of the world -- as a concept -- and they often enjoy opportunities to be creative. INTPs are logical, analytical, and detached in their approach to the world; they naturally question and critique ideas and events as they strive for understanding. INTPs usually have little need to control the outer world, or to bring order to it, and they often appear very flexible and adaptable in their lifestyle.

39. ESTP For ESTPs the dominant quality in their lives is their enthusiastic attention to the outer world of hands-on and real-life experiences. ESTPs are excited by continuous involvement in new activities and in the pursuit of new challenges. ESTPs tend to be logical and analytical in their approach to life, and they have an acute sense of how objects, events, and people in the world work. ESTPs are typically energetic and adaptable realists, who prefer to experience and accept life rather than to judge or organize it. ESFP For ESFPs the dominant quality in their lives is their enthusiastic attention to the outer world of hands-on and real-life experiences. ESFPs are excited by continuous involvement in new activities and new relationships. ESFPs also have a deep concern for people, and they show their caring in warm and pragmatic gestures of helping. ESFPs are typically energetic and adaptable realists, who prefer to experience and accept life rather than to judge or organize it. ENFP For ENFPs the dominant quality in their lives is their attention to the outer world of possibilities; they are excited by continuous involvement in anything new, whether it be new ideas, new people, or new activities. Though ENFPs thrive on what is possible and what is new, they also experience a deep concern for people as well. Thus, they are especially interested in possibilities for people. ENFPs are typically energetic, enthusiastic people who lead spontaneous and adaptable lives. ENTP For ENTPs the driving quality in their lives is their attention to the outer world of possibilities; they are excited by continuous involvement in anything new, whether it be new ideas, new people, or new activities. They look for patterns and meaning in the world, and they often have a deep need to analyze, to understand, and to know the nature of things. ENTPs are typically energetic, enthusiastic people who lead spontaneous and adaptable lives.

40. ESTJ For ESTJs the driving force in their lives is their need to analyze and bring into logical order the outer world of events, people, and things. ESTJs like to organize anything that comes into their domain, and they will work energetically to complete tasks so they can quickly move from one to the next. Sensing orients their thinking to current facts and realities, and thus gives their thinking a pragmatic quality. ESTJs take their responsibilities seriously and believe others should do so as well. ESFJ For ESFJs the dominant quality in their lives is an active and intense caring about people and a strong desire to bring harmony into their relationships. ESFJs bring an aura of warmth to all that they do, and they naturally move into action to help others, to organize the world around them, and to get things done. Sensing orients their feeling to current facts and realities, and thus gives their feeling a hands-on pragmatic quality. ESFJs take their work seriously and believe others should as well. ENFJ For ENFJs the dominant quality in their lives is an active and intense caring about people and a strong desire to bring harmony into their relationships. ENFJs are openly expressive and empathic people who bring an aura of warmth to all that they do. Intuition orients their feeling to the new and to the possible, thus ENFJs often enjoy working to manifest a humanitarian vision, or helping others develop their potential. ENFJs naturally and conscientiously move into action to care for others, to organize the world around them, and to get things done. ENTJ For ENTJs the driving force in their lives is their need to analyze and bring into logical order the outer world of events, people, and things. ENTJs are natural leaders who build conceptual models that serve as plans for strategic action. Intuition orients their thinking to the future, and gives their thinking an abstract quality. ENTJs will actively pursue and direct others in the pursuit of goals they have set, and they prefer a world that is structured and organized.

41. TYPE STRENGTHS AND CHALLENGES TABLE EXTRAVERSION STRENGTH EXTRAVERSION CHALLENGE ___OUTGOING ___MONOPOLIZES ___TALKATIVE ___INTERRUPTS ___MULTI-TASKING ___NOT LISTENING ___TAKES CHARGE ___TAKES OVER INTROVERSION STRENGTH INTROVERSION CHALLENGE ___CONTEMPLATIVE ___WITHDRAWN ___LISTENS ___RECLUSIVE ___OBSERVES ___SILENT ___INNER MEANING ___PASSIVE

42. TYPE STRENGTHS AND CHALLENGES TABLE SENSING STRENGTH SENSING CHALLENGE ___DETAILED ___NIT-PICKS ___PRECISE ___MISSES BIG PICTURE ___PRACTICAL ___LACKS VISION ___REALIST ___RELUCTANT TO TRY NEW THINGS INTUITION STRENGTH INTUITION CHALLENGE ___VISIONARY ___ABSENT-MINDED ___SEES POSSIBILITIES ___FORGETFUL ___INSIGHTFUL ___IMPRACTICAL ___SEES BIG PICTURE ___UNFOCUSED

43. TYPE STRENGTHS AND CHALLENGES TABLE THINKING STRENGTH THINKING CHALLENGE ___TOUGH-MINDED ___OVERLY BLUNT ___ASSERTIVE ___INSENSITIVE ___RATIONAL ___ARGUMENTATIVE ___OBJECTIVE ___COLD FEELING STRENGTH FEELING CHALLENGE ___HARMONIOUS ___CONFLICT-AVOIDANT ___FRIENDLY ___UNASSERTIVE ___WARM ___LACKS OBJECTIVITY ___FORGIVING ___FAILS TO SEE WEAKNESS IN OTHERS

44. TYPE STRENGTHS AND CHALLENGES TABLE JUDGING STRENGTH JUDGING CHALLENGE ___ORGANIZED ___AUTOCRATIC ___PLANFUL ___RIGID ___DECISIVE ___INFLEXIBLE ___FOLLOWS A SCHEDULE ___CONTROLLING PERCEIVING STRENGTH PERCEIVING CHALLENGE ___FLEXIBLE ___INDECISIVE ___OPEN TO CHANGE ___DISORGANIZED ___SEEKS ALTERNATIVES ___PROCRASTINATES ___INVITES SUGGESTIONS ___HESITATES

45. STEP 4: ASK CLIENT TO SHARE EXAMPLE FOR TYPE CHARACTERISTICS FOR WHICH CLIENT AND SIGNIFICANT OTHER ARE MOST HARMONIOUS. STEP 5: ASK CLIENT TO SHARE EXAMPLE FOR TYPE CHARACTERISTICS FOR WHICH CLIENT AND SIGNIFICANT OTHER ARE LEAST HARMONIOUS.

46. STEP 6: ASK CLIENT IF HE/SHE HAS ANY IDEAS ABOUT HOW TO IMPROVE COMMUNICATION FOR THE TYPE CHARACTERISTICS THAT ARE LEAST HARMONIOUS. DISCUSS TALKING IN TYPE ALTERNATIVES.

47. TALKING IN TYPE(Jean M. Kummerow, 1985) TALKING WITH EXTRAVERTS RESPOND QUICKLY WITHOUT LONG PAUSES TO THINK ALLOW TALKING OUT LOUD WITHOUT DEFINITE CONCLUSIONS SHOW ENERGY AND ENTHUSIASM TALKING WITH INTROVERTS ALLOW TIME FOR I’S TO THINK BEFORE RESPONDING HAVE MORE INDIVIDUAL OR ONE-TO-ONE ACTIVITIES THAN GROUP ACTIVITIES DO NOT ASSUME AN I IS UNINTERESTED-THEY MAY JUST BE TAKING TIME TO PROCESS INFORMATION

48. TALKING IN TYPE TALKING WITH SENSERS SHOW EVIDENCE, i.e. FACTS, DETAILS AND EXAMPLES SHOW HOW YOUR SUGGESTION IS A CONTINUATION OF WHAT IS, NOT A RADICAL CHANGE BE PRACTICAL AND REALISTIC, AND DOCUMENT SUCCESSFUL APPLICATIONS TALKING WITH INTUITIVES PRESENT GLOBAL SCHEMES, THE CONCEPT-GIVE THE MAIN IDEA FIRST DON’T GIVE LOTS OF DETAILS UNLESS ASKED TO DO SO LET N’S DREAM AND DON’T BURST THE BUBBLE-ENCOURAGE IMAGINATION

49. TALKING IN TYPE TALKING WITH THINKERS BE LOGICAL AND DO NOT RAMBLE LIST THE PROS AND CONS OF EACH ALTERNATIVE BE CALM AND REASONABLE TALKING WITH FEELERS BE PERSONABLE AND FRIENDLY SHOW WHY THE IDEA IS VALUABLE TO PEOPLE AND HOW IT WILL AFFECT PEOPLE BE AWARE THAT F’S MAY HAVE DIFFICULTY BEING CRITICAL AND GIVING NEGATIVE FEEDBACK

50. TALKING IN TYPE TALKING WITH JUDGERS PRESENT A TIMETABLE AND STICK WITH IT DON’T SURPRISE J’s, GIVE WARNINGS OF COMING CHANGES WHEN POSSIBLE ALLOW TIME TO PREPARE TALKING WITH PERCEIVERS ALLOW FOR OPTIONS, CHANGES REALIZE ANY CHANGE IN DIRECTION IS NOT NECESSARILY IMPULSIVENESS ALLOW FOR THINGS TO FLOW, NOT TO FOLLOW YOUR TIME AND ACTION CALENDAR