80 likes | 206 Views
Update on the Global Climate Change Alliance (GCCA) Update on work on the Global Climate Financing Mechanism (GCFM). Marco Morettini Policy Officer, Climate Change. Global Climate Change Alliance – Objective and Scope.
E N D
Update on the Global Climate Change Alliance (GCCA)Update on work on the Global Climate Financing Mechanism (GCFM) Marco Morettini Policy Officer, Climate Change
Global Climate Change Alliance – Objective and Scope • Through effective dialogue and cooperation, the Alliance will help poor developing countries: • To adapt to the effects of climate change, in support of the achievement of the MDGs • To participate in the global mitigation effort, where this benefits their poverty reduction efforts • The Alliance is targeted at poor developing countries most vulnerable to climate change, in particular the LDCs and SIDS • Added value • European dimension • Political dimension • Using established channels
Global Climate Change Alliance – Effective Cooperation • Focus on five areas: ►adaptation ►disaster risk reduction ►reducing emissions from deforestation ►participation in the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) ►integration of climate change into poverty reduction strategies • EC: €60 million of additional funds to kick-start Alliance plus contributions from geographical programmes; €5.5 million from Sweden • Priority adaptation, DRR and climate change integration • Preferred aid modality: budget support (but project support also possible)
International Finance Facility concept • IFF proposed by Gordon Brown in 2003 to increase support to achieve MDGs by borrowing on the capital market • Basic idea to frontload support • Overcome fiscal constraint on ODA increase • Justified when needs are urgent, short-term funds are restricted and long-term funds are possible • Commitments are not reflected in fiscal accounts (or deficit calculation), or as ODA, until actual payments are made according to an agreed schedule • An IFF is to be established as triple-A rated financial institution benefiting from high market confidence and low cost.
Using an IFF for climate finance • Some parallels between health and climate change: both are linked to MDGs and both are Global Public Goods • Postponing adaptation action could imply greatly increased costs (e.g. when investments to counteract climate related disasters are not undertaken) • Available ODA is not sufficient to deal adequately with climate adaptation • Innovative funding and financing mechanisms are desirable • Possibilities for innovative funding exist linked to the future CO² market (e.g. a share of the revenue from auctioning emission rights)
Conditions for a climate IFF to be successful • Frontloading must be solidly justified (the cost of setting up the financial mechanism must be justified) • International financial markets must be ready to buy the climate bond • There should be fundable adaptation and mitigation plans that fit the development (poverty reduction) strategy (budget support is desirable) • A group of donors should be ready to enter into legally binding irrevocable payment obligations • A reasonable magnitude should be between € 500 million and € 1 billion per year: • Example € 1 billion per year for 5 years starting in 2010 would require annual repayments of € 380 million for 20 years
Further work required • Which financial institution should issue the climate bond? • What governance structure: representation of donors and recipients • An EU initiative linked to GCCA or an initiative that would make a wider appeal to other DAC members or even OPEC members?