1 / 22

Colorado Precision Plating

Colorado Precision Plating. Presented by Craig Myers, OSC. CO Precision Plating. This used to be Colorado Precision Plating, a small niche market plating facility that serviced the aerospace industry near Boulder, Colorado. CO Precision Plating. Fire at a plating shop, early morning 12/12/11

mariel
Download Presentation

Colorado Precision Plating

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Colorado Precision Plating Presented by Craig Myers, OSC

  2. CO Precision Plating This used to be Colorado Precision Plating, a small niche market plating facility that serviced the aerospace industry near Boulder, Colorado.

  3. CO Precision Plating • Fire at a plating shop, early morning 12/12/11 • Local Volunteer Fire Dept on scene • Regional HazMat team arrives, sees water run off, asks IC to stop fire suppression effort • First in unit has bunker gear with a residual pH of ~3 • Local VFD requestes EPA’s assistance • Emergency decon, tyvek suits, disposed of bunker gear • new gear overnighted to staff their house the next day…

  4. EPA’s Role • VFD has insufficient resources to remain overnight…wants to put the fire out. • Fire Chief wants our advice

  5. CO Precision Plating • EPA is asked to assess the run off • Is it just fire fighting water, or is it more? • Reservoir ¼ mile away, water supply for Longmont • Only instant test is pH and visual (chrome, anodizing dies, etc) • However…

  6. Co Precision Plating • Business is a tenant on the property, leased the structure. • Property owner and spouse went to the hospital • 80+ years old • Treated and released; not answering cell phone. • Business owner died in October, business in probate, the widow is not answering either… • Access should be granted by both, as they both have 4th and 5th Amendment rights on the property.

  7. Emergency Phase • Citing protection of the public good: • I had START enter the property to • Conduct in situ pH tests • Take limited samples of the runoff water • and document visual observations • Nothing that could be construed as “enforcement related” was done. • Actions were to support the VFD’s needs • And to make immediate decision about the protection of a water supply • No product samples • Building still too hot, structurally unsafe • Could not articulate immediate protection of the public interest to justify the takings

  8. Removal Phase • Access granted 12/13/11 • Building is unstable, waste cannot be assessed safely until building is dismantled and/or demolished.

  9. Complications • Arson investigation • Can’t happen until haz-waste removed • Haz Waste Removal • Can’t happen until building is demolished • Building Demolition • Will destroy any evidence for arson investigation • BCSO and Hygiene Fire decide to forego the arson investigation and turn the property over to the property owners/EPA

  10. Current State 12/13/11 • Unstable building • Unknown amount of incompatible Haz-waste • Acids, bases, metal laden solutions • All in compromised containers • Assumed to be around 5,000 gallons • Building was built before 1980 • Does it contain Asbestos Containing Building Materials (ACBM)? Almost certainly. • Asbestos assessment cannot be performed…

  11. A Recurring Issue • NESHAPS • Colorado has Reg. 8, other states have similar regulations governing asbestos removal • Has “emergency exemptions” • Still take time to gain state approval of the exemption • Require PE to determine building structure unsound. • Implemented at the state level by Air Programs, not Haz Waste • Thus staff not familiar with CERCLA/ARARs

  12. ARARs • Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Regulations • CERCLA actions must comply with substantive provisions, to the extent practical. • Cost and Project delay are both factors to consider when determining practicality. (see 1990 NCP Preamble)

  13. Unsafe for Occupancy • Signed by local building official • Unsafe ≠ Structurally Unsound… • May or may not be a Professional Engineer • Required for emergency exemption under NESHAPS

  14. Did EPA comply with NESHAPS? • Very cold ~ 10° F • Wet demo, to the extent practicable • Assumed all fire debris contained ACM. • Used ARAR authorities in 400(g) and 415(j). • Disposed in NESHAPS cell

  15. Waste Characterization • Unique numbers • Samples HazClassed • Major DOT hazard classes and RCRA characteristic waste codes • Allows waste to be bulked prior to disposal.

  16. Site Assessment • Surface water sampling of all fire fighting water and surface expressions • Low level detections in the creek during fire fighting operations • Soil sampling where fire fighting water had pooled and at French drain outfall. • French drain outfall very high • Soil borings via GeoProbe near leachfield, French drain outfall, and other locations. • Ubiquitous low level contamination

  17. Results – Surface Water

  18. Results - Soil

  19. Results – Subsurface Soil

  20. Waste Bulking

  21. Disposal Summary

  22. Questions? Craig Myers Myers.craig@epa.gov (303) 312-7067

More Related