1 / 4

Project Review Feedback

Project Review Feedback. Bob Jones Technical Coordinator, WP12, CERN Bob.Jones@cern.ch. Review Agenda: Friday 1 st March. Introduction: Kyriakos Baxevanidis/EU & Hans Hoffman/CERN Project overview: Fabrizio Gagliardi Architecture, middleware & delivery schedule – Bob Jones

marietta
Download Presentation

Project Review Feedback

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Project Review Feedback Bob Jones Technical Coordinator, WP12, CERN Bob.Jones@cern.ch

  2. Review Agenda: Friday 1st March • Introduction: Kyriakos Baxevanidis/EU& Hans Hoffman/CERN • Project overview: Fabrizio Gagliardi • Architecture, middleware & delivery schedule – Bob Jones • Applications • WP8: Federico Carminati • WP9 Julian Linford • WP10: Johan Montagnat • Testbed 1 : Charles Loomis • Demos • WP8: Eric Van Herwijnen & Joel Closier • WP9: Johan Van De Vegte & Christine Leroy • WP10: Vincent Breton & Yannick Legre • Quality Assurance: Gabriel Zaquine • Dissemination: Roberto Puccinelli

  3. Review Feedback (I/II) Comments by Dr Karsten Decker: • Project is congratulated for exceeding expectations and 1st year objectives – it has been well managed and is on track • Welcome incremental releases – improve testing and feedback • Data mgmt should be extended beyond simple read facilities – to make it attractive to other user groups • In future reviews will look for details of scalability, fault tolerance & security • Demo was useful and realistic – not everything worked to perfection • Licensing issues are important - urged to solve this quickly

  4. Review Feedback (II/II) • Must publish results widely in conferences and journals - ensure EDG innovations are correctly credited to the project and EU • Dissemination needs quantitive results for next review – e.g. number of contacts made at each event • Extra-ordinary review to be held in May/June at ESA site – written details of funding & activity requested • All deliverables are accepted – a 1st for the reviewers • Written report from reviewers will be produced in 3 weeks • Kyriakos Baxevanidis : “congratulations to the project…please take on-board the recommendations from the reviewers”

More Related