1 / 53

JAmCollCardiol2010;55:2816–21 Tonino , Fearon et al. Frijo Jose A

Angiographic V/s Functional Severity of Cor A Stenoses in the FAME Study FFR v/s CAG in Multivessel Evaluation. JAmCollCardiol2010;55:2816–21 Tonino , Fearon et al. Frijo Jose A. Objectives.

mariko
Download Presentation

JAmCollCardiol2010;55:2816–21 Tonino , Fearon et al. Frijo Jose A

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Angiographic V/s Functional Severity of Cor A Stenoses in the FAME StudyFFR v/s CAG in Multivessel Evaluation JAmCollCardiol2010;55:2816–21 Tonino, Fearon et al. Frijo Jose A

  2. Objectives • To investigate the relationship between angiographic and functional severity of cor A stenoses in the FAME study

  3. Background • CAG may result in both underestimation & overestimation of a lesion’s severity & is often inaccurate in predicting which lesions cause ischemia

  4. Principle • FFR valueof <0.80 identifies ischemia-causing coronary stenoses with an accuracy of >90%

  5. Fractional flow reserve • During maximum vasodilation • Mean cor pressure/mean Ao pressure • Unaffected by alteration in resting flow • Can immediately assess importance of a lesion for guiding intervention • Considerable prognostic information • FFR more than 0.8- excellent outcome with deferred rather than prophylactic intervention • Most direct way to assess physiological significance of a lesion

  6. Clinical uses of FFR 1. Determining the hemodynamic significance of CAG intermediate lesions: • Pijls et al - cutoff 0.75 detected ischemia – sensitivity- 88%, specificity- 100%, diagnostic accuracy- 93% • DEFER - moderate CAD + FFR>0.75 - PCI v/s medical – PCI event rate > medical event rate

  7. Clinical uses of FFR 2. Determining success of PCI: • Multicenter registry - FFR determined immediately after stenting – most signi independent variable related to future events

  8. Clinical uses of FFR 3. Determining significance of LMCA lesions: • Bech et al- 54pts (29/12)- equivocal LMCA • Medical - 24 pts with FFRs >0.75 • CABG - 30 pts with FFR <0.75 • Survival – medical- 100%, CABG- 97%

  9. Clinical uses of FFR 4. Determining the significance of multiple stenoses in the same coronary artery: • FFR can be used to “map” the hemodynamic effects of multiple stenoses in the same vessel • FAME

  10. Recommendations for Use of Fractional Flow Reserve Class IIa • Can be useful to determine whether PCI of a specific corlesion is warranted • Can be useful as an alternative to performing noninvasive functional testing (eg, when the functional study is absent or ambiguous) to determine whether an intervention is warranted • In the assessment of the effects of intermediate corstenoses (30% to 70% luminal narrowing) in pts with anginalsymptoms

  11. Inclusion • Mul-tivessel CAD, defined as cor A stenoses of ≥50% of vessel diameter in ≥2 of 3 major epicardialcor A, & if PCI was indicated

  12. Exclusion • Left main coronary disease • Previous CABG • Recent STEMI(<5days) • Recent N-STEMI(<5days) if peak CK is >1000IU • Cardiogenic shock • Extremely tortuous/calcified cor • Lifeexpectancy <2y • Pregnancy • Contraindication for DES placement

  13. In this subanalysis of the FAME study, the relationship between CAG & FFR in all pts in the FFR-guided arm ( 509) was analyzed • 1,005 pts with multi vessel disease were randomly assigned to CAG –guided PCI ( 496) or FFR-guided PCI ( 509)

  14. Categorized the lesions according to visual CAG stenosis severity into 50%to70%, 71%to90%, & 91%to100% diameter stenosis • In those randomized to FFR guidance, if the FFR of a particular stenosis was >0.80, -was considered as functionally nonsignificant & no stent was placed • The definition of functional 0-,1-,2-,or3-VD was made on basis of no of main arteries with an FFR <0.80 • So, a pt with CAG 3- VD could be classified as having functional 0-,1-,2-,or3-VD, after FFR

  15. Serial stenoses • Stenting is only performed if FFR beyond all narrowings is≤0.80 • Investigator then stents the narrowing that appears most signi or is responsible for largest P gradient during pullback of P sensor • After stenting 1st lesion, FFR is measured again & any residual narrowing causing an FFR ≤0.80 is stented • IV adenosine as opposed to intra-coronary adenosine because IV adenosine provides prolonged hyperemia, which allows adequate time to perform a pullback of the pressure wire and localize pressure gradients

  16. In all FFR-guided pts, investigator is encouraged to measure a final FFR aft PCI • Although the final FFR measurement can be quite useful for assessing PCI result, it is not mandated in protocol in an attempt to keep the procedure as simple as possible

  17. primary end point (1yr) • Rate of death • Nonfatal myocardial infarction • Repeat revascularization

  18. In pts presenting with a NSTEMI & ↑CK-MB before PCI, if peak CK-MB has not occurred, a periprocedural MI will be defined as • Recurrent chest pain lasting for ≥30 m OR new ECG changes consistent with a 2nd MI • & an ↑ in CK-MB by ≥50% of the preprocedure CK-MB level • If the pre-PCI CK-MB is falling or already N, then a periprocedural MI will be defined as a CK-MB ↑ ≥3 times upperlimit of N & a 50% ↑from pre-PCI CK-MB level

  19. Results • FFR-guided arm of the FAME study -509 pts • 1,414 lesions –indicated before randomization –FFR was measured successfully in 1,329(94%) of the 1,414 lesions • 620(47%) - 50%to70%category • 513(39%) - 71%to90%category • 196(15%) - 91%to99%category

  20. Of all 1,329 lesions, 816(61%) were below ischemic threshold (FFR ≤0.80) • Of 50%to70% category, in 402(65%), FFR was >0.80 and in 218(35%), FFR was ≤0.80 • Of 71%to90% category, in104(20%), FFR was >0.80 and in 409(80%), FFR was ≤0.80 • In 91%to99% category,7(4%) FFR >0.80 and 189(96%) had FFR ≤0.80

  21. Discussion • All stenoses with CAG severity 50%to70%, 65% - functionally nonsigni & 35% - functionally signi by FFR • In more severe stenoses71%-90% CAG severity- 20% did not induce reversible myo ischemia as established by FFR

  22. In pts with multivessel CAD, routine measurement of FFR during PCI, as compared with the standard strategy of PCI guided by CAG, signi ↓ rate of 1˚composite end point of death, MI, & repeat revasc at 1 year • The combined of death & MI was also signi ↓ • Without prolonging the procedure, the FFR-guided strategy ↓the no of stents used, ↓ the amount of contrast agent used

  23. Diabetic Atherosclerosis Preventionby Cilostazol (DAPC) Study Katakami, Young-SeolKim et al. Circulation.2010;121:2584-2591

  24. Background • Anti-platelet drugs are effective in preventing recurrence of atherosclerosis in T2 DM. • However, the efficacy & usefulness of 2 different antiplatelet drugs, aspirin and cilostazol, in the progression of carotid intima-media thickening are unknown.

  25. Aim • To compare cilostazol and aspirin in prevention of progression of atherosclerosis

  26. T2-DM aged 40-85years at the time of enrollment who were suspected of having PAD on the basis of an ABI of <1.0, poor pulsation bilaterally or substantially weaker pulsation on either side in the case of the popliteal artery or dorsalispedis artery, and/or clinical symptoms of PAD

  27. 329 type2 DM suspected of PAD were allocated to either • Aspirin-treated(81to100mg/d)group - 152 • Cilostazol-treated(100to200mg/d)gp-145 • The changes in intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery during a 2-year observation period were examined as the primary endpoint

  28. Results • In pts in cilostazolgp, there was signi improvement in max & mean left CCA-IMT during treatment compared with baseline; max & mean right CCA-IMT also exhibited a tendency toward improvement • In pts in the aspirin gp- there was signi ↑in max left, max right, and mean right CCA-IMT from baseline

  29. Conclusions • Compared with ASA, cilostazol potently inhibited progression of carotid IMT, an established surrogate marker of CV events, in pts with type2 DM

  30. Effects of Intensive BP Control in T-2 DMACCORD-BP Cushman, Evans et al. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1575-85.

  31. Background • There is no evidence from randomized trials to support a strategy of lowering SBP <135 to 140 mm Hg in persons with T2DM

  32. Aim • Whether therapy targeting normal SBP (i.e., <120 mm Hg) ↓ major cardiovascular events in participants with type 2 diabetes at high risk for cardiovascular events

  33. 4733 type 2 DM • Intensive therapy- SBP-< 120 mm Hg • Standard therapy- SBP-< 140 mm Hg

  34. The ACCORD BP trial was a study of a treatment strategy to achieve specific SBP goals, rather than an evaluation of any specific drug regimen

  35. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and a glycated hemoglobin level of 7.5% or more • And were ≥40 yrs with CV disease or ≥55 yrs with anatomical evidence of a substantial amount of atherosclerosis, albuminuria, LVH, or at least two additional risk factors for CVD (DLP, HTN, smoking, or obesity)

  36. Primary composite outcome • nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, or death from CV causes The mean follow-up - 4.7 years

  37. Results • Mean SBP- 119.3 mm Hg intensive & 133.5 mm Hg standard • Annual rate of primary outcome - 1.87% (intensive) & 2.09% (standard), P = 0.20) • Annual rates of death from any cause -1.28% and 1.19% ; P = 0.55 • Annual rates of stroke- 0.32% and 0.53% ; P = 0.01 • Serious adverse events attributed to anti-HTN treatment -77 of 2362 (intensive-3.3%) and 30 of 2371 (standard-1.3%)- P<0.001

More Related