1 / 8

Quality Panels

Quality Panels. SW Public Health Specialty Training Programme November 2011. Outcome of quality panel. S ummary report providing quality grading for each location reviewed by the panel

marion
Download Presentation

Quality Panels

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Quality Panels SW Public Health Specialty Training Programme November 2011

  2. Outcome of quality panel • Summary report providing quality grading for each location reviewed by the panel • A         Excellent (Green)B         Satisfactory (Green)C1       Action and feedback (Amber)C2       Action soon (Amber)D         Unsatisfactory and immediate action (Red) 

  3. Evidence Reviewed • GMC Surveys Current and Past to determine progress • Deanery End of Placement Surveys 2009/2010 • Trainee input • Soft intelligence from ARCP/RITA process • The preceding Annual Report to the Deanery from the Training Programme Director

  4. Other evidence that could be considered: • Local surveys within the programme • Results of external visits to the programme from GMC, another training programme or a visit from a Royal College.

  5. GMC quality domains 1 Patient Safety • Supervision, workload intensity, handover, consent procedures, EWTR (European Working Time Regulation) 2 Quality Control, review and evaluation • Governance, local review of GMC and Deanery Surveys with trainee input. 3 Equality, diversity and opportunity • Wide access to training and participation in training, fair recruitment, programme design, job adjustment and provision of information. Adherence to all equal opportunity legislation

  6. GMC domains 4 Recruitment, selection and appointment  • Probably not directly relevant for Panels to Evaluate Training Posts. 5 Delivery of approved curriculum and assessment • Ability to deliver the curriculum within any department, adequate experience and competence, access to learning opportunities. Workplace based assessments, appraisal and feedback. 6 Support and development of trainees, trainers and local Faculty • Departmental induction and meetings with the Educational Supervisor, learning agreements, feedback, career advice and support. Work intensity, bullying, audit, organized educational activity, generic professional skills and counselling. Study leave and academic opportunities

  7. GMC domains 7 Management of education and Training • Accountability at all levels of training; Deanery; Schools; Programmes and Trusts. Adherence to GMC standards 8 Educational resources and capacity • Educational capacity of the unit offering training. Facilities including internet access and library. Suitable ratio of trainers: trainees; adequate provision of training time for trainers  9 Outcomes • Evidence of trainee progression such as examination and assessment results. • Prizes or commendations acquired by the training unit.

  8. Composition of Panel to Evaluate Training Posts • Lay advisor (Chair) • Training Programme Director or • Associate Patch Dean (Primary Care) • Specialty Tutor (not from the same Department or Practice as the Training Programme Director or Patch Dean). • Trainees (in general terms, one trainee should be from the early years of the training programme ST1-3, and another trainee should be from the later part of the training programme ST4-6). • Trainees and trainers should be equally represented • Training Programme Director or Head of School from a non related programme. The external input may be beneficial to the panel. It will also provide a degree of faculty development for the external participant.

More Related