1 / 21

Semantic Web for Life Sciences W3C

Semantic Web for Life Sciences W3C. BOF 2005 ISMB. Agenda. What is SW? Current Activities Use Case Scenarios Resources What do we need to focus on next?. What is SW?. RDF - Web-transportable descriptive model of all information

marion
Download Presentation

Semantic Web for Life Sciences W3C

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Semantic Web for Life SciencesW3C BOF 2005 ISMB

  2. Agenda • What is SW? • Current Activities • Use Case Scenarios • Resources • What do we need to focus on next?

  3. What is SW? • RDF - Web-transportable descriptive model of all information • OWL - Web Ontology Language; 3 levels of complexity/expressivity • Focus on Semantic rather than Syntax • Open world Graph model of all information on the Web • Rules - SWRL

  4. RDF-XML DTD

  5. Semantic Web for Life Sciences • An Open Scientific Forum for • Defining Cross-Disciplinary Life Science needs • Show-Casing Working Examples • Initiating SW Work Groups • Capturing Best Practices • Charter being completed • Promote LSID awareness and use • Sandbox for BioDASH demo and semantic lenses • Identify Semantic Issues for CT and HC • Recent members include Merck, caBIG/NCI, TeraNode

  6. W3C Semantic Web for Life Sciences • Mission StatementThe Semantic Web for Life Sciences (SWLS) Interest Group is chartered to facilitate use of Semantic Web in life sciences, drug discovery, and healthcare through the development of core vocabularies, implementation of unique identifiers, and discussion of implementations among users. The SWLS Working Group will also work with the other Semantic Web working groups and the Semantic Web Interest Group to gather suggestions for further SWLS development work and liaison with other Working Groups within the W3C and other organizations to promote the use of Semantic Web technologies and foster the growth of machine-readable, policy-aware data and databases in the life sciences.This work falls within the Technology and Society Domain.

  7. PotentialSW Applications • Data Integration and Aggregation • Semantic Interoperability for Services • Manage Terminology and Semantics of Communities • Semantically Linking Scientific Literature • Organization and Business Flow Modeling • Manage Knowledge Assets: R&D insights, IP Ref: “A Life Science Semantic Web: Are We There Yet?” Science-STKEissue 283, pp. pe22, 10 May 2005

  8. 6 Proposed Objectives for SW in Life Sciences • Database Conversions and Transforms: query in SPARQL and retrieve in RDF • Unique identifiers that are supported by the SW URI model • Tools Conversant in RDF-OWL (Web-Services) • Coordination and management of terminologies and ontologies: SW collaborative communities • Knowledge-encoding practices: Named-Graphs for theories, hypotheses, models • Semantics accounts and channels: store and share semantic annotations (based on RDF)

  9. SWLS Current and Proposed Activities • Enabling (wrapping) Databases in RDF • MolBio (NCBI, Uniprot), Pathways (BioPAX), • RDB-Access, XML-RDAL, SPARQL • Development and demonstration of the public tools • Haystack, Simile, JENA, ? • Need to define “Context”: Use cases? • Types: Biological, Axiomatic, Experimental • Named Graphs: http://www.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/suhl/bizer/pub/Carroll_etall-TrustWorkshop-ISWC2004.pdf • Public Semantic spaces (shareable annotations)

  10. Haystack Semantic Web Browser – MIT/IBMhttp://haystack.lcs.mit.edu BioDASH Topic View

  11. Tools • RDB-RDF-Access - • http://www.w3.org/2004/04/30-RDF-RDB-access/ • http://www.w3.org/2004/10/04-pharmaFederate/ • XML-->RDF - http://www.w3.org/2005/02/13-KEGG/ • Protégé - http://protege.stanford.edu/ • SESAME - http://www.openrdf.org/ • JENA - http://www.hpl.hp.com/semweb/jena2.htm • SWOOP - http://www.mindswap.org/2004/SWOOP/

  12. Demos/POCs • BioDash/Haystack - • http://www.w3.org/2005/04/swls/BioDash/Demo/ • Simile/Longwell/Welkin - • http://www.w3.org/2005/04/swls/simile/ • myGRID-Taverna - • http://taverna.sourceforge.net/ • Connotea (NPG) - • http://www.connotea.org/

  13. Pathway Polymorphisms • Identify targets with lowest chance of variance • Predict parts of pathways with highest functional variability • Map genetic influence to potential pathway elements • Select mechanisms of action that are minimally impacted by polymorphisms

  14. Pathway Semantic Lens example add { :predicateSetrdf:type graph:CollectionPredicateSet ;rdf:type graph:PredicateSet ;dc:title "BioPAX pathway arrows" ;hs:member biopax:NEXT-STEP ;hs:member :pointingTo ;hs:member ${ rdf:type vowl:RDFQueryLens ; vowl:sourceExistential ?s ; vowl:targetExistential ?t ; rdfs:label "" ; vowl:existentials @( ?s ?t ?type ) ; vowl:statement ${ vowl:subject ?type ; vowl:predicate biopax:LEFT ; vowl:object ?s } ; vowl:statement ${ vowl:subject ?type ; vowl:predicate biopax:RIGHT ; vowl:object ?t }} }

  15. DiseasePolymorphisms Disease Group Protein Person Chemicalentity Multiple Ontologies Used Together UMLS OMIM SNP Drug target ontology FOAF UniProt BioPAX PubChem Patent ontology Extant ontologies Under development Bridge concept

  16. Scales of Ontologies • Large Vertical Models (UMLS, GO) – common semantics • Small Locally-defined models – local definitions specific to organizations • Bridging Ontologies – small semantics used to adjoin elements of other ontologies • Ad hoc forms by individuals that are explorative and evolving

  17. Power of Semantic Lenses in Research • Separates information collection and presentation from information processing: not all require coding! • Database federation can be achieved using lenses • Allows users to create powerful context-specific views of combined information, that can be annotated and shared • Lenses do not require programming, can be extended, and can be shared/traded • Less development time, more definition be scientists More can be achieved in less time and for less cost!

  18. SIMILE-MIT • Annotation Accounts • Piggy-Bank plug-in for FireFox • Welkin SW Graph viewer

  19. Tox/Efficacy ADME Optim New Regulatory Issues Confronting Pharmaceutics from Innovation or Stagnation, FDA Report March 2004 • Support All Stakeholders • Relate information from different platforms and different projects

  20. What should we do next? • caBIG coordination • Clarify LSID <=> RDF id relations • Handling Ontology versioning • Citation and references in LSIDs

  21. How to become active? • Mailing list - public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org • Coordinate your projects with us • Become a W3C member Semantic Web for Life Sciences • www.w3.org/2005/04/swls

More Related