1 / 33

Why plasma processing? (1)

Why plasma processing? (1). Accurate etching of fine features. UCLA. The Coburn-Winters experiment. Ion bombardment greatly enhances chemical etching. UCLA. Why plasma processing? (2). Plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) Sputtering Ashing. UCLA.

marja
Download Presentation

Why plasma processing? (1)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Why plasma processing? (1) Accurate etching of fine features UCLA

  2. The Coburn-Winters experiment Ion bombardment greatly enhances chemical etching UCLA

  3. Why plasma processing? (2) • Plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) • Sputtering • Ashing UCLA

  4. Low-temperature plasma physics • Plasmas are collisional • At least 3 species: ions, electrons, neutrals • Always boundaries and sheaths • Many effects not present in hot plasmas; e.g. • dissociation of molecules • electron attachment to form negative ions • charged particulates (dust) • interaction with surface layers UCLA

  5. The nature of sheaths UCLA

  6. The sheath’s E-field accelerates the ions and makes them go straight UCLA

  7. The Debye length and quasineutrality Poisson eqn. Gradient scale length L Define Then The LHS cannot be very large, so ni ~ ne unless L ~ lD UCLA

  8. Sheaths are very thin numerically, Let Then Debye sheaths are approximately 5lD thick UCLA

  9. The Child-Langmuir Law When the potential of an electrode is very negative, the sheath drop is so large that ne can be neglected near the electrode. The sheath thickness then follows a simple law. ions only quasi-neutral ions and electrons d  V 3/4 +  + + +  UCLA

  10. Presheath and Bohm criterion For a sheath to form, the ions entering the sheath must have a minimum velocity of cs = (KTe/M)1/2, or E = ½KTe. This means that there must be a presheath where ions are accelerated. Presheaths are hard to calculate, so we assume a sheath edge at x = xs. UCLA

  11. Log (V) vs. x (exact calculation) The Child-Langmuir slope is not followed unless V is very large. UCLA

  12. Applying a voltage • The sheath barrier for electrons at the wall or large electrode must be about 5 KTe to make ion and electron currents equal. • If two walls are at different potentials, the more negative one will have a larger sheath and smaller electron current. • The plasma follows the potential of the most positive electrode. It must always be more positive than the walls. • If the voltages oscillate, the electron current will flow alternately to one or the other electrode. UCLA

  13. Neutral collisions Ions and electrons make “billiard ball” collisions with neutral atoms, so the i-n and e-n cross sections are about the same. The e-n collision rate is where the average is over the electrons’ Maxwellian distribution An atom has a radius of about 10-8 cm (= 1Ǻ or 0.1 nm), so the cross section is about 10-16 cm2. A hydrogen atom has a s of 0.88 Ǻ. Particles diffuse by random walk. UCLA

  14. Resonant charge exchange HOWEVER, ions and atoms of the same species have much larger cross sections because of charge exchange. Suppose a fast ion encounters a slow neutral. An electron can simply jump from the neutral to the ion, making a slow ion and a fast neutral. The ion appears to have suffered a large collision even if the energy exchange is very small, so the cross section is very large. Charge exchange cross sections, e.g. Ar+ - Ar, can be 100 times larger (~ 10-14 cm2). UCLA

  15. Momentum transfer collisions in Argon << Ramsauer minimum UCLA

  16. Collision frequencies UCLA

  17. Argon ionization UCLA

  18. Ionization cross sections UCLA

  19. Charge exchange cross sections J.W. Sheldon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 8, 64 (1962) Argon Xenon UCLA

  20. Charged-particle (Coulomb) collisions UCLA

  21. Coulomb collisions with and w/o a B-field In “weak” B-field No B-field Together, these cause a 90 scatter a factor ln L times more often than a single 90 scatter.

  22. “Spitzer” resistivity These are for 90 deflections in multiple collisions. The Coulomb logarithm ln L can be approximated by 10. Electrons driven through a plasma by an E-field are slowed down by collisions with ions, resulting in this resistivity: Density cancels out and plasma resistivity is independent of n. UCLA

  23. When are electron-ion collisions important? Electron-neutral collisions: Then Electron-ion collisions: (ln L ~ 10) Hence, For 3 mTorr and Te = 3 eV, ncrit 2  1011/cm3 UCLA

  24. Mobility and Diffusion ( || to B or B = 0) u is the drift velocity due to an E-field, and m is the mobility Here u is the drift velocity in a pressure gradient, and D is the diffusion coefficient Quasineutrality requires Gi = Ge The fluxes to the walls are: An E-field will set up to retard the electrons and accelerate the ions. This is not in the sheath; it is in the collisional body of the plasma. Result: UCLA

  25. Diffusion and mobility perpendicular to B Cyclotron frequency Larmor radius Diffusion and mobility across B is slowed down by a factor ~ wc2/n2, which can be large for electrons but is usually negligibly small for ions. UCLA

  26. The Simon Short Circuit Effect (1) In a magnetic field, ambipolarity does not have to be obeyed in either the || or the  direction. More electrons will flow to the endplates, and more ions to the sidewalls. Only the total fluxes have to be equal. UCLA

  27. The Simon Short Circuit Effect (2) The sheath drop at the endplates can vary with radius, allowing a few more electrons to leave at large r than at the center. Electrons appear to have moved radially outwards, although they are lost axially. The ambipolar field is not observed. The electron density tends to be Maxwellian even in the r direction. UCLA

  28. Particle balance in gas discharges Ions diffuse out normally at the Bohm rate, and electrons follow by the short circuit effect. The g’s are geometric factors (r, L, etc.) Ion-electron pairs are replenished by ionization. Here V is the volume, and the <sv> is the ionization rate. Equating input and output, we see that the plasma density n cancels out, leaving only a relation between pressure and electron temperature. UCLA

  29. Te rises as pressure decreases UCLA

  30. Power balance in plasma sources The energy leaving the plasma is the sum of three terms. This is the energy carried out by each ion leaving the plasma through the sheath. This is the energy carried out by each electron leaving the plasma, including the perpendicular part. Wc is the energy lost by line radiation and used in ionization. It is the function Ec(Te), which is the energy required to make an ion-electron pair (next slide). The density produced at given RF power absorbed is Wtot times the loss rate of ions through the wall sheaths. UCLA

  31. The Vahedi curve Argon This includes all losses in inelastic collisions UCLA

More Related