1 / 36

Lecture 2 – Ethics in Psychological Research

Lecture 2 – Ethics in Psychological Research. Outline. Psychologists have a special responsibility to behave ethically towards others There are no special individuals who know best how to behave ethically Ethical research follows from openness and some simple guidelines.

Download Presentation

Lecture 2 – Ethics in Psychological Research

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lecture 2 – Ethics in Psychological Research

  2. Outline • Psychologists have a special responsibility to behave ethically towards others • There are no special individuals who know best how to behave ethically • Ethical research follows from openness and some simple guidelines

  3. Psychologists’ special responsibility • We study people – not things. • Mental states are properly private, except where licence is given for intervention. • Harm may be done by such intervention, so special care is warranted.

  4. There are no special individuals who know best how to behave ethically • There are no “special people” who know better than the rest of us how to behave ethically • No religious figures, no philosophers, no politicians or professors

  5. There are no special individuals who know best how to behave ethically • How would you become such a person? • Would someone train you? • Who? • How would you select such a person?

  6. There are no special individuals who know best how to behave ethically • If you are not an ethical person yourself, how would you be able to tell that someone else is? • If someone tells you that they have special knowledge of how to behave ethically, why should you believe them?

  7. There are no special individuals who know best how to behave ethically • But that’s alright, because you don’t have to be special to be ethical. • Ordinary people like us are ethical • As ordinary people, scientists depend upon each other, upon the science community, for guidance • Being scientists, we’ve turned this into a process

  8. Ethical research follows from openness and some simple guidelines… • Oversight • Risk vs. benefit • Informed consent • Privacy • Deception • Debriefing • Using animals • Reporting

  9. Ethical research follows from openness and some simple guidelines… • Note – these guidelines are useful but not foolproof • Final responsibility for any research project always rests with the investigator

  10. Ethical research follows from openness and some simple guidelines… • Oversight • Risk vs. benefit • Informed consent • Privacy • Deception • Debriefing • Using animals • Reporting

  11. Oversight • The most important concept in our study of ethics is oversight • Oversight means telling some people what you plan to do and getting their opinions before you do it

  12. Oversight • Question: should oversight be objective, or informed? • Can it be both? • Who is likely to be informed? • How likely are they to be objective?

  13. Ethical research follows from openness and some simple guidelines… • Oversight • Risk vs. benefit • Informed consent • Privacy • Deception • Debriefing • Using animals • Reporting

  14. Risk vs. benefit • Who takes the risks associated with research? • What is “acceptable” risk? • Acceptable to whom?

  15. Risk vs. benefit • Who gets the benefits? • How do we assess the benefits? • Significance • Immediacy • Probability

  16. Ethical research follows from openness and some simple guidelines… • Oversight • Risk vs. benefit • Informed consent • Privacy • Deception • Debriefing • Using animals • Reporting

  17. Informed consent • Various totalitarian states conducted brutal research on prisoners in the 20th century. • We don’t do that. • Human participants are volunteers. • All of them. • Always.

  18. Informed consent • Consent • Must be genuine • Do not lie about things that would affect willingness to participate • Do not offer significant inducements

  19. Informed consent • Provide all the information a person needs to decide whether to participate • Explain the task • Explain rights and recourse • Be clear about risks • Be sure you are understood • You do not need to explain the hypothesis

  20. Ethical research follows from openness and some simple guidelines… • Oversight • Risk vs. benefit • Informed consent • Privacy • Deception • Debriefing • Using animals • Reporting

  21. Privacy • 3 major dimensions: • Sensitivity of the information • Degree of dissemination? • Is the setting for observation public or private?

  22. Ethical research follows from openness and some simple guidelines… • Oversight • Risk vs. benefit • Informed consent • Privacy • Deception • Debriefing • Using animals • Reporting

  23. Deception • Milgram: • Technical illusion • Deception is not always bad – e.g., surprise party; special effects in movies; Santa Claus • Suspension of a general moral principle for a public purpose

  24. Milgram’s argument – my view • He makes a sensible case that deception is not always wrong • Milgram also offers a reasoned statement of the potential benefits of research involving deception • But decide for yourself: • Milgram, S. (1988). Can deception in psychological research be justified? Yes. In Rubenstein & Slife (Eds.) Taking Sides. Guilford, CT., Dushkin

  25. Deception • Baumrind • Deception interfers with informed consent • Cost to profession • Deception teaches people to distrust psychologists

  26. Baumrind: 3 arguments against deception • “(a) the right of self-determination within the law, which translates in the research setting to the right of informed consent; (b) the obligation of a fiduciary (in this case, the researcher) to protect the welfare of the beneficiary (in this case, the subject); and (c) the obligation, particularly of a fiduciary, to be trustworthy in order to provide sufficient social stability to facilitate self-determined agentic behavior.” (1985, p. 167)

  27. Baumrind’s argument – my view • Overstates potential harm to the subject • Overstates potential harm to the profession • Understates potential benefits from research • But decide for yourself: • Baumrind, D. (1985). Research using intentional deception. American Psychologist, 40 (2), 165-174.

  28. Deception – general view • Is deception justified by prospective value of result? • Is there any other way to get the data? • Never deceive about anything that would affect willingness to participate in the study • Clear up deception at earliest possible moment

  29. Ethical research follows from openness and some simple guidelines… • Oversight • Risk vs. benefit • Informed consent • Privacy • Deception • Debriefing • Using animals • Reporting

  30. Debriefing • Discuss the study with the participant after their participation • Their insights may be useful • This is also a way of thanking them • Public relations value for the profession – we could use it.

  31. Ethical research follows from openness and some simple guidelines… • Oversight • Risk vs. benefit • Informed consent • Privacy • Deception • Debriefing • Using animals • Reporting

  32. Using animals • Be humane • Be competent • Know the literature • Know procedures • Minimize pain, stress • Use anesthesia • Kill humanely

  33. Ethical research follows from openness and some simple guidelines… • Oversight • Risk vs. benefit • Informed consent • Privacy • Deception • Debriefing • Using animals • Reporting

  34. Reporting • Don’t plagiarize • Don’t falsify data • Give credit where it’s due • Share data when asked • Maximize society’s return on its investment in your work • Publicize, share, be competent

  35. Review • There are no special people who know best how to be ethical • We depend upon each other, but that’s OK because most people are ethical • Oversight is very important

  36. Review • Human subjects are always volunteers • They give informed consent • They share risks and benefits

More Related