1 / 11

Data Citation Breakout Report

Data Citation Breakout Report. Pine Group http://twc.titanpad.com/82 March 3, 2011. Folks. Chris Mattmann (NASA JPL, University of Southern California) Bob Arko (LDEO) Joanne Luciano (RPI) Anna Milan (NGDC) Bob Simons (NOAA) Brian Wee (NEON, Inc.) Leslie Hsu (LDEO)

marli
Download Presentation

Data Citation Breakout Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Data Citation Breakout Report Pine Group http://twc.titanpad.com/82 March 3, 2011

  2. Folks • Chris Mattmann (NASA JPL, University of Southern California) • Bob Arko (LDEO) • Joanne Luciano (RPI) • Anna Milan (NGDC) • Bob Simons (NOAA) • Brian Wee (NEON, Inc.) • Leslie Hsu (LDEO) • Roland Viger (USGS, reporting) • James Wilson (James Madison University) • Tom Narock (NASA/GSFC) • Cathy Constable (SIO, UCSD) • Yoori Choi (CUAHSI)

  3. Good Article on DOI Formation • http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january11/starr/01starr.html

  4. Feedback • Guidance/examples to clarify • Many types of data (collect use-cases) • Scope of Identifier vs. Metadata • Daisy Chaining of DOIs • Roles (author, editor, others?) • authorship problematic (person who wrote the text report, idea person, technician/data cruncher/point of content) • Publisher also possibly unclear • Synthetic collections (what’s a “new” dataset?).

  5. Maintenance & Policy • Orphaned DOIs • Infrastructure/tools to detect • Policy consensus on what to do • Funding to implement • Ties in to data stewardship • Require DOI issuer to verify qualified hosting?

  6. Usage/Context of Citation • Subsetting? • Part of author’s methods? Transformations? • Not just “lat/long box”, selection by attribute, feature • Date of download vs. date of online availability • Promote linkage to traditional pubs • Minimum completeness of DOI spec vetted • Not science content or even metadata

  7. Possible Special Cases • Again, metadata vs. identifier/locator clarity • Multi-step derivatives • Year • Publication vs. acquisition • Temporal range • Provisional vs. Final data • Dynamic (e.g. real-time) “living” data sets and DOIs

  8. Research Needs • Consensus thresholds for creating a "new" product? • Reproducibility • Domain-specific? • New version vs. new data product • Handle "living"/streaming/real-time (i.e. constantly updated with new obs) data sets • Handle provisional/QA/QC changes to a data set (i.e. fixing previous obs)

  9. Ideas for Functionality • UnidataIDV used to allow publication of XML for specifying all the data used in a 4-D visualization. A consumer could load that XML into a new IDV session and pull all the exact same data.--> interesting application of a data citation. • Compilation tools from data provider to help create citable datasets. • Ruth’s point re: users not realizing what tools are doing wrt data marshalling

  10. Education/Outreach/Marketing • Consensus in community, traditional publishers critical uptake • Could inform NSF data mgmtreqs • Promote as important (potentially) as trad. Pubs for researcher evaluation

More Related