460 likes | 573 Views
Welcome to Subject to Culture Specification : Advanced, double, honours (Level 6) Pre-requisites : U75128 Critical Media Literacies U75144 Digital Media and Youth Identities. Welcome to Subject to Culture Consolidation : builds on:
E N D
Welcome to Subject to Culture Specification: Advanced, double, honours (Level 6) Pre-requisites: U75128 Critical Media Literacies U75144 Digital Media and Youth Identities
Welcome to Subject to Culture Consolidation: builds on: U75108 Understanding Culture U75141 Writing Technologies U65032 Cultures of Publishing U74124 Culture, Gender and Sexuality U75183 Branded Communication U37782 Cities and Society U65028 Print and Society U70070 Subject to Discourse: Language and Literacies
Objectives and Content Objective: to think critically about our own use of contemporary culture Specifically: we will be looking at different theories concerning how culture contributes to our values, identities, and sense of self Content: mind-viruses, religion, gender, subversive sexualities, technology, narcissism, aardvarks, apes, plague, prisons, cyborgs, Frankenstein, castrati, writers, race, 1980s New York clubbing, ancient Greek practices of self-mastery, et al.
Format Duration: 2 semesters (whole year) – Handbook, back page Tutors: Semester 1: Tom Semester 2: Federica Format: text-based (Module Reader) – 15 readings Key Concern: how do the text’s ideas and concepts apply to culture and to ourselves? Any Questions?
Be Yourself “Be Yourself”: a sentiment commonly encountered today: conversation, television, magazines, song lyrics, etc. Two Examples…
Well, I am what I am what I am could be who you are Is your pain when you smile because you built a wall around your heart Do the thoughts in your head keep you up cause you feel alone And are you strong enough to be yourself Papa used to say you’re just a loser and you’re never gonna have what it takes Mama used to say all that loud music you play ain’t gonna get you nowhere You gotta be yourself You gotta be yourself If you can’t, can’t be yourself what are you living for If you can’t, can’t be yourself you’re gonna lose it all If you can’t, can't be yourself what are you living for You’re gonna find someday you’re gotta run away you gotta run, run, run away Enrique Iglesias ‘Be Yourself’: Seven (2003)
Fugees ‘Just Happy To Be Me’Elmopalooza! (1998) Can you tell me how to get... …how to get to Sesame Street? Be yourself (Just be yourself) Easy as A-B-C (A-B-C) Can’t be no one else (No one else!) Just happy to be me! (Yeah! Yeah!) Hey yo, the A is for achievement Hey yo, the B is for beneficent And the C is for commitment And the D is for diligent What about the E, the F, the G, the H, the I, the J? I’m in my P.J.’s, I’m drinkin’ O.J.! Ha Ha! The big city, just like I pictured it Millions of people rushing around real quick Each one’s original, one of a kind, unique So, kick back and listen while L-Boogie speaks Not trying to be different, just doing they own thing So come on everybody, clap your hands and sing
The Self Be Yourself: what does this mean? What are Enrique and Lauryn trying to convey? Your Self: something special, important, to be protected Key Theme: within contemporary society, rarely questioned This Module: interrogate this conception Module Texts: all examine it in different ways So what are the key characteristics of this notion of the self?Four key characteristics…
1. Free Enrique: “Are you strong enough to be yourself?” Implication: despite pressures, you can resist: you are free Pressures: other people, the media, culture, government Free to Resist: nothing can force you away from your true self Be strong, keep it real, be yourself A Self Is: free
2. Unique Lauryn: “Each one’s original, one of a kind, unique” Implication: there’s no-one else just like you Unique: you are special, singular, unusual, distinctive (even identical twins) A Self Is: unique
3. Unified Enrique: “If you can’t be yourself you’re gonna lose it all” Question: you’re going to lose it all - but lose what? Unified: we are all unified individuals Individual: in-divisible, i.e. integrated, wholeSelf: is unified, coherent, a single unity, self-contained, united Self: can’t be spread over several people/places! Warning: hold this self together or you’re going to lose it A Self Is: unified
4. Distinct Lauryn: “Not trying to be different, just doing they own thing” Distinct: you are separate, independent from others Self is: self-sufficient, not attached to anyone else, you do your own thing A Self Is: distinct
Californian Cult of the Self The Self: free, unique, unified, distinctMichel Foucault: calls this ‘the Californian cult of the self’ Objective: to discover your trueself Means: gaze deep within yourself, interrogate inner self,identify the essential core to your personality Means: perhaps psychology or psychoanalysis Goal: separate your true self from everything else don’t let it be obscured or suppressed resist external forces trying to swamp it don’t be false, fake or phoney Any Questions?
The Subject Californian Conception: one way of thinking about identities and personalities Module Objective: What are its limitations? Module Objective: What other ways are there? From Self to ‘Subject’: an alternative term The Subject: can be used in place of ‘the self’ Meaning: various - see module texts Two Key Meanings…
The Subject (Grammatical) “Tom thanked Federica” ‘Tom’: subject (the do-er) ‘Federica’: object (the done-to) The Subject: initiates action, acts, does things Grammatical Subject: can thus be free, unique, unified, distinct Grammatical Subject: compatible with Californian ‘self’
The Subject (Legal) “The Queen’s subjects” Queen’s Subjects: subject to the law (done-to) The Subject: acted upon by forces/powers beyond their control Legal Subject: not entirely free, unique, unified and distinct Legal Subject: different to Californian ‘self’
The Ambiguous ‘Subject’ The Subject: free, unique, unified and distinct, and The Subject: restrained, restricted and subjected The ‘Subject’ vs the ‘Self’: productive ambiguity The Subject: doesn’t commit us to Californian conception of self The Subject: doesn’t rule out Californian conception of self Any Questions?
Weekly Readings (Handbook, pp. 6-9) Californian Conception: not wrong, but a common sense notion we should question (an ideology) Weekly Readings: discuss subjects not selves Who’s Right?You decide
Weekly Readings Fifteen Readings: different ways of thinking about subjects Difficulty: vary considerably: Easy Manageable Demanding Hard Impossible
The Consuming Subject Gabriel, Y. and Lang, T. (2006). The Unmanageable Consumer. 2nd ed. London: Sage, pp. 78-95 (Chapter 5). society of consumers every facet of life impact on identity subject = consumer
The Extended Subject (1) McLuhan, M., and Fiore, Q. with Agel, J. (1967). The Medium is the Massage: An Inventory of Effects. New York: Bantam Books, pp. 26-41. (2) McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 3-6 (Introduction),41-47 (Chapter 4). impact of media technologies media extend us media numb us subject = extendable
The Taxonomic Subject Dawkins, R. (1993). Gaps in the Mind. In: Cavalieri, P. and Singer, P., eds.The Great Ape Project: Equality Beyond Humanity. London: Fourth Estate,pp. 80-87. humans are apes discontinuous mind taxonomic divisions subject = related
The Interpellated Subject (1) Althusser, L. (1977). Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. In: Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Brewster, B. (trans.). 2nd ed. London: NLB, pp. 121-73 (pp. 160-65). (2) Williamson, J. (1995). Decoding Advertisements: Ideology and Meaning in Advertising. Enlarged ed. London: Marion Boyars, pp. 26, 48-55. we are hailed turning is recognition recognition is subjection subject = interpellated
The Reflected Subject (1) Crossley, N. (2005). Key Concepts in Critical Social Theory. London: Sage, pp. 190-95. (2) Williamson, J. (1995). Decoding Advertisements: Ideology and Meaning in Advertising. Enlarged ed. London: Marion Boyars, pp. 61-67. mirror stage of infant development coherence = misunderstanding alienation from self subject = reflected
The Writing Subject Barthes, R. (1977). The Death of the Author. In: Image-Music-Text. Heath, S., trans. London: Fontana, pp. 142-48. meanings of texts not authors’ intentions authority from language itself subject = written
The Cyborg Subject Gray, C. H. with Figueroa-Sarriera,H. J. and Mentor, S., eds (1995).The Cyborg Handbook. London: Routledge, pp. 1-14 (Introduction). Donna Haraway cybernetics and cyborgs prosthetics and enhancements subject = cyborg
The Subcultural Subject Hebdige, D. (1979). Subculture: The Meaning of Style. London: Methuen, pp. 1-4 (Introduction) and pp. 5-19 (Chapter 1). meanings within subcultural groups high/mass culture power and hegemony subject = styled
The Masked Subject Gergen, K. J. (1972). Multiple Identity: The Healthy, Happy Human Being Wears Many Masks. Psychology Today. 5 (May), pp. 31-35, 64-66. postmodern psychology coherent sense of self? experiments with students subject = masked
The Evolving Subject Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press,pp. 203-15 (Chapter 11). evolutionary theory memes (replicators) mind viruses subject = mass of memes
The White Subject Dyer, R. (1997). White: Essays on Race and Culture. London: Routledge,pp. 1-14. racial imagery in culture white = default identity, personality, autobiography subject = racial
The Gendered Subject (1) Tyler, T. (1996). Constructing and Performing Genders. (2) Butler, J., Osborne, P., and Segal, L. (1994). Gender as Performance:An Interview with Judith Butler.Radical Philosophy 67, pp. 32-39. gender = performance punishment subversion subject = performative
The Carceral Subject Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin, pp. 195-209. modern prisons plague and panopticon segregate and survey subject = incarcerated
The Normal Subject (1) Finkelstein, V. (1975). To Deny or Not to Deny Disability. In: Magic Carpet, XXVII.1 (New Year), pp. 31-38. (2) Swain, J. and Cameron, C. (1999). Unless Otherwise Stated: Discourses of Labelling and Identity in Coming Out. In: Corker, M. and French, S. Disability Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press, pp. 68-78. wheel-chair thought-experiment disability is constructed privilege subject = (ab)normal
The Cultivated Subject Foucault, M. (1984). On the Genealogy of Ethics: An Overview of Work in Progress. In: Rabinow, P., ed. The Foucault Reader: An Introduction to Foucault’s Thought. London: Penguin, pp. 340-72 (359-66). ancient Greek culture old conception of the Self work of art subject/self = cultivated
Reading the Reader Reader: free (but no spares)Moodle:readings on Brookes Virtual Reading Strategy: read twice - (1) skim in 10 mins (2) read and annotate
Website (Handbook, p. 5) url: www.cyberchimp.co.uk/U75184/ Resources: weekly readings, downloads page, forum
Seminars Seminars: in class and online Class: weekly small groups, 1 hour per week Reading: must read before classObjective: understand the reading • Seminar: not explanation • Seminar: discussion, questions, preparation for assignmentsAllocations: must come to correct seminar (transfers) Show and Tell Classes: every third week or soObjective: relate readings to assignmentsActivity: apply theories to a cultural artefact More on this in Week 4 Seminar Groups…
Seminar Groups: Thursday afternoon Seminar Group 1: 13.00-14.00 (1) 11021608 BATES, LYDIA (2) 11022372 BERGAN, RACHEL (3) 11023307 BRADNACK, HAYLEY (4) 11017646 CHITNIS, LYDIA (5) 11066608 DESCHAMPS, BENJAMIN (6) 11015612 GARNHAM, OLIVIA (7) 11035626 LUKIC, ALEXANDER Problem? See me at the end Seminar Group 2: 14.00-15.00 (1) 11028614 MAYNE, CLAIRE (2) 11080027 PADGHAM, JESSICA (3) 11052383 PARRY, FRED (4) 11053336 PEEL, ANTONIA (5) 11011501 RAHELA, RAJEEV (6) 11025278 WESTHEAD, GABRIELLE (7) 11018111 WILKES-CIUDAD, ORQUIDEA
Seminar Groups: Thursday eveningSeminar Group 3: 17.00-18.00 (1) 11021851 ELWES, THOMAS (2) 11029776 GEESON. EMILY (3) 11071640 HARMAN, LUKE (4) 11114954 HOMMA, AIRI (5) 10021206 LEE, HOI YAN FION (6) 11115592 NATALIA, CYNTHIA (7) 11054957 NORDAN RIIBE, NIKOLAI Problem? See me at the end Seminar Group 4: 18.00-19.00 (1) 11014731 OTA, HAYATO (2) 13049582 REID, JASMINE (3) 11022831 SHAKESHAFT, HANNAH (4) 11091103 SKATVEDT IVERSEN, MAGNUS (5) 11024413 SPARKS, ABIGAIL (6) 11024530 SPORE, CHLOE (7) 11063947 VORSTER, ANNELIE
Online Seminars Forum: http://www.cyberchimp.co.uk/U75184/forum/ Preparation: discuss text before class seminar Consolidation: discuss text after to class seminarAssessment: Forum posts part of both assignments Registration and Posting: see Handout…
Assessment (pp. 10-13) Two Assignments: (1) Hypomnemata (Semester 1) (2) Life in a Day (Semester 2) Readings: both assignments linked directly to readings
Hypomnemata (pp. 10-11) Pronounced: eep –om –nemata History: ancient Greek, c. Plato Function: a scrapbook, notebook, copybook for quotations, observations, fragments, examples Objective: apply readings to cultural artefacts Brief: compile a selection of examples, extracts and quotations from different cultural forms (1-4) Brief: apply the ideas and concepts from the readings (4)
Hypomnemata Length: 3000 words, plus 8 Forum posts Deadline: 1.00pm Friday 13.12.2013 (Week 12) Submission: Postbox and Turnitin Advice 1: compile your hypomnemata week by week Advice 2: spelling and grammar not so importantAdvice 3: read around (see website)Advice 4: tutorials: Tuesday and Thursday afternoons Summary: (1) choose appropriate examples, (2) demonstrate your familiarity and competence with the module’s concepts and ideasAny Questions?
For Next Week (1) Read Module Handbook (2) Browse Module Website (3) Register on the Forum (4) Post on the Forum (5) Read the first text: Gabriel and Lang, ‘The Consumer as Identity-Seeker’
Further Reading Barker, F. (1995). The Tremulous Private Body: Essays on Subjection. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Butler, J. (1997). The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Crossley, N. (2005). Key Concepts in Critical Social Theory. London: Sage. Du Gay, P., Evans, J. and Redman, P. (eds.) (2000). Identity: A Reader. London: Sage. Elliott, A. (ed.) (1999). The Blackwell Reader in Contemporary Social Theory. Oxford: Blackwell. Elliott, A. (2007). Concepts of the Self. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity. Fay, B. (1996). Contemporary Philosophy of Social Science. Oxford: Blackwell. Gauntlett, D. (2008). Media, Gender and Identity: An Introduction. 2nd ed. London: Routledge. Gergen, K. J. (1991). The Saturated Self: Dilemmas of Identity in Contemporary Life. New York: Basic Books. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity. Hacking, I. (1990). The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 160-69 (Chapter 19, ‘The Normal State’). Hall, S. and Du Gay, P., eds. (1996). Questions of Cultural Identity. London: Sage. Hartley, J. (2002). Communication, Cultural and Media Studies: The Key Concepts. 3rd ed. London: Routledge. Holstein, J. A. and Gubrium, J. F. (2000). The Self We Live By: Narrative Identity in a Postmodern World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kimmel, M. and Ferber, A (2003). Privilege: A Reader. Boulder, CO: Westview. Ovid (Publius Ovidius Naso) (1717). Metamorphoses. Garth, S., ed. Dryden, J., Pope, A., Addison, J., et al., trans. London: Jacob Tonson. Retrieved 23 August 2012 from The Internet Classics Archive <http://classics.mit.edu/Ovid/metam.html>.