640 likes | 969 Views
The Shared Study of Paired Texts. Atonement and Life of Pi : narrating the Other to renovate the self. What does the pairing of these texts reveal?. Both: emphasise the tension between different versions of the truth and ask the audience to choose
E N D
The Shared Study of Paired Texts Atonement and Life of Pi: narrating the Other to renovate the self
What does the pairing of these texts reveal? Both: • emphasise the tension between different versions of the truth and ask the audience to choose • trade heavily upon the emotional engagement enacted upon the audience by the brilliant use of prolepsis (narrative leaps in time) • are narrated by ‘survivors’ of families which have fallen apart • narrators are caught in the opposing discourses voiced by their parents • narrators carry guilt but with quite different dynamics
What does the pairing of these texts reveal? • In assessing BrionyTallis’ fictional atonement,Brian Finney concludes that “the attempt to imagine the feelings of others is perhaps the one corrective that we can make in the face of continuing human suffering”. Considered in this light, Pi’s story of Richard Parker is his fictive attempt to reimagine his own darkest feelings by projecting them onto the animal ‘other’, against which in childhood he had been taught to measure his own humanity.
A KEY FEATURE OF THE PAIRED TEXTS STUDY:how effectively does the student compare and contrast texts to evaluate the role of sociocultural and situational contexts? • The sociocultural context of Atonement would account for the influence of the British class system and literary tradition on Ian McEwan’s writing of the novel, whose publication at the end of the millennium anticipated a situational context of intense historical reflection.
A KEY FEATURE OF THE PAIRED TEXTS STUDY:how effectively does the student compare and contrast texts to evaluate the role of sociocultural and situational contexts? • The situational context of Life of Pi would account for its success as the adaptation of an ‘un-filmable’ novel through the cinematic magic of 3D digital technology, while the sociocultural context of its narrative spoke to a desire for religious pluralism and environmental awareness.
Atonement homework! • Before Thursday, re-read chapters 2 & 3 (24p.), noting any connections between them & to the rest of the novel
What does the pairing of these texts reveal? The pairing of Atonement with Life of Pi enables us to focus on the themes of guilt and redemption, conflict, coming of age,love, the power of storytelling and the resilience of the human spirit.
The options for establishing links between these paired texts could be: • common themes, ideas, or topics • narrative truth, • guilt, • redemption, • love, etc. • historical or literary periods • both early 21st C. post-modern texts – one inter-textual in literary approach, the other magic-realist • using different cultural settings of a nostalgic 20th C. Britain and a pan-pacific diaspora
The options for establishing a link between these paired texts could be: • the same genre or different genres • bildungsroman • family saga vs. lone survival tale • historical romance vs. post-colonial fable • social realist novel vs. magic realist film • similar or contrasting cultural perspectives • English vs. Chinese-American authors • European vs. global (multi-cultural Canadian) contexts
At some moments chilling, at others desperately sad, the play told a tale of the heart whose message, conveyed in a rhyming prologue, was that love which did not build a foundation on good sense was doomed. Ian McEwan, Atonement
’Dear Miss Morland, consider the dreadful nature of the suspicions you have entertained. What have you been judging from? …what ideas have you been admitting?’ Jane Austen, Northanger Abbey
Atonement: the expiation of a fearful symmetry • “The problem these fifty-nine years has been this: how can a novelist achieve atonement when, with her absolute power of deciding outcomes, she is also God? … There is nothing outside her. In her imagination she has set the limits and the terms. No atonement for God, or novelists, even if they are atheists. It was always an impossible task, and that was precisely the point. The attempt was all.” London, 1999; p. 371 • Literary models • Northanger Abbey (Jane Austen, 1817); Clarissa (Samuel Richardson, 1748); What Maisie Knew (Henry James, 1897); The Go-Between (L. P. Hartley, 1953); The French Lieutenant’s Woman (John Fowles, 1969) • Literary allusions • Twelfth Night (William Shakespeare, 1601); Lady Chatterley's Lover (D. H. Lawrence, 1928); “In Memory of W. B. Yeats“ (W. H. Auden, 1940)
Life of Pi allegorises the interplay between reason and faith, which do not necessarily contradict each other, but are, like yin and yang forever swirling around each other, complementary. NB: the irrational number determines the relationship of a circle’s area to its radius – a ratio of the outside world to the inner life
Tsimtsum • The concept of Tsimtsum is a 16th century kabbalistic explanation of how God, if infinite and omnipresent, could form a material, physical world separate from himself. If God is everywhere and in everything, how could he create a place where he was not? How could God create a world infused with evil? • The kabbalistrabbi Isaac Luria first posited that God vacated a region within himself in order to create the world.Through this act of “shrinking,” “withdrawal,” or “contraction” (the literal meaning of the Hebrew word tsimstum), God brought into being a vacuum in which to create something other than Himself. He could then fill this vacuum or empty space by the simultaneous process of self-revelation and creation. • In short, the first act of creation was, according to Luria, a self imposed exile of God from part of Himself. God had descended more deeply into his own being and put a limit upon Himself.
Richard Parker • Edgar Allan Poe's uncompleted adventure novel The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym(1837) is the story of four shipwrecked sailors who find themselves facing starvation in a small lifeboat. The four draw lots to see who will be sacrificed and cannibalized by the other three. In this fictional account, a man named Richard Parker draws the short stick and is promptly stabbed and eaten by the surviving trio. • Ironically, in 1884 four survivors of a factual shipwreck stood trial for the murder of their ship's cabin boy, Richard Parker, who was killed and eaten in a true to life version of Poe's story. This real life event occurred some 47 years after Poe wrote his adventure novel. • Martel might be also making reference to a third allusion with his use of the name Richard Parker. Clifford Richard Parker, 28, was a clerk from Guernsey who was aboard the Titanic as a second class passenger. He was lost at sea and his body was never identified.
Life of Pi: an existentialist allegory of faith reconciled • Pi is an existentialist because at all times he adheres to Sartre’s definitive, existentialist proposition: “existence precedes essence”. Pi suffers his existential circumstance, his shipwreck, then, after, and only after this circumstance, he wills his own essence, after he chooses to live and not to die — for it is a tenet of existentialism that one has to confront absurdity to transcend it From the blog posting “Life of Pi: Pi the Existentialist” by sincerefoolhttp://wasiswill.wordpress.com/2013/01/05/life-of-pi-pi-the-existentialist/
Life of Pi: an existentialist allegory of faith reconciled • Pi’s essence, his way of adding meaning to his life, is to tell the good story – the truth falls by the wayside, as does religion, as does God, as does Richard Parker when he doesn’t turn around to meet Pi’s gaze, the animal’s story coming to an end, the animal losing its essence-tial function. Pi constructs his essence, in response to his unreasonable existence, in the very trade which Yann Martel practises: not only is Piscine Molitor Patel an existentialist, but quite possibly his talented creator is too. From the blog posting “Life of Pi: Pi the Existentialist” by sincerefoolhttp://wasiswill.wordpress.com/2013/01/05/life-of-pi-pi-the-existentialist/
Components of the self • The characters in The Life of Pi – like in any dream, since film is essentially collective dreaming – are all actually components of the self. At a higher level, the Tiger is Pi’s primal self, the orang-utan represents universal love – as demonstrated by a protective mother, the brutal hyena is the malevolent cook who is the shadow, and the timid zebra is a young sailor with a broken leg, which represents the innocence of youth and the first to die. All are essential for becoming who we are. From “Meaning, Faith and the Life of Pi” by Moses Ma in The Tao of Innovation, publishedon November 26, 2012 http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-tao-innovation
Pi’s thirst • Richard Parker’s real name – lost due to a clerical error – is “Thirsty”, and where else, beside lost in a life raft in the middle of the ocean, can you be surrounded by water and still die of thirst? In the same way, God is actually all around us, and still, so many of us are unable to receive the manna of heaven. In Hindu culture, water symbolizes the 'ocean of life,' with all living creatures existing as one contiguous body. The sea torments Pi with waves, threatens him with sharks, and even robs him of his family. At the same time, the sea also gives him life. It rains flying fish upon him, it grows a magical garden of algae, and in the end, bestows the gift of wisdom. Even Pi’s proper name, Piscine, is after a swimming pool - an object built to hold water, the water of spirit and God. From “Meaning, Faith and the Life of Pi” by Moses Ma in The Tao of Innovation, publishedon November 26, 2012 http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-tao-innovation
The raft of faith • the raft… is something that [Pi] has to construct by himself, in order to be effective. The through line – i.e. the spine of this remarkable tale – is that it is his raft that never forsakes him. More than any other part of the tale, it is the invisible force that finally brings him to safety and the force that transforms him into the individual he finally becomes. Our challenges are what help to define us; what guides us to becoming more. What greater challenge can there be than trapped with a ferocious tiger? More so, if that tiger is your own fear, anxiety, depression, desolation, and despair. It is our faith that helps us cross the cruel and endless sea. From “Meaning, Faith and the Life of Pi” by Moses Ma in The Tao of Innovation, publishedon November 26, 2012 http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-tao-innovation
Credulity • Martel proves, by skilful example, that realism is narrative’s great master, that it schools even its own truants. He reminds us in fact that realism is already magical, an artifice-in-waiting. • It is fine to tell contemporary readers that their God is or should really be Story; most of them think that anyway. But who is Pi’s God? That is the deeper, and unanswered question. After all, it is by experiencing Pi’s credulity that our own credulity might have been not only seduced but engaged and challenged. I fear that Yann Martel has only seduced ours and then in effect congratulated himself for doing it so vividly. From James Wood’s review of the novel in London Review of Books Vol. 24 No. 22 · 14 November 2002; pages 24-25
anachrony [an-ak-rôni] • A term used in modern narratology to denote a discrepancy between the order in which events of the story occur and the order in which they are presented to us in the plot. Anachronies take two basic forms: ’flashback’ or analepsis and ’flashforward’ or prolepsis.roflcopterlololol • Atonement uses a combination of both methods: notably on p.40, when the narration moves forwards (prolepsis) from Briony’s apparent 1930’s present to the recollections of her adult self as a writer in the 1990’s; and on p.229, when the narration moves backwards (analepsis) from Robbie's June 1940 present to a flashback of June 1932
Adjective: anachronic • Life of Pi uses an anachronic narrative in the more conventional sense of a ’framing device’ – the Canadian context of the adult Pi recounting his tale to a writer. The opening titles sequence of the Pondicherry zoo reveals itself through the VO to be a flashback (or analepsis) from the present to Pi’s birth, with which he is (chronologically) beginning his life’s story, and the film soon establishes a narrative pattern of movement between 1990’s Montreal and 1960’s India.
focalisation • The term used in modern narratology for ’point of view’; that is, for the kind of perspective from which the events of a story are witnessed. Events observed by a traditional omniscient narrator are said to be non-focalised, whereas events witnessed within the story’s world from the constrained perspective of a single character are ’internally focalised’.
focalisation • The nature of a given narrative’s focalisation is to be distinguished from its narrative ’voice’, as seeing is from speaking. • The events of Atonementare ’internally focalised’ in incredibly subtle ways through the many narrative voices of its characters, particularly Briony, Robbie and Cecilia.
Paired narrative techniques • McEwan’s use of focalisation complicates the authorial partiality of a Jane Austen novel, when the ’omniscient narrator’ of the older Briony-as-author, compromised by her need for atonement, can no longer be seen as non-focalised.
Paired narrative techniques • While the majority of Lee’s film is told from Pi’s point of view, the focalisation in Atonement has a subtle but significant equivalent in Life of Pi when the relationship at sea with Richard Parker incorporates the tiger’s perspective.
Paired narrative techniques • McEwan employs this particular ’modal determination’ for two reasons: • to distinguish his narrative from the classic realist novel’s association with an omniscient narrator (Briony’s lie came from positioning herself as such a narrator in her fictionalized scenario of events) • to demonstrate Briony’s, the adult narrator’s, attempt to project herself into the thoughts and feelings of her characters, an act crucial to her search for forgiveness.
Metafiction: self-reflexive texts • Fiction about fiction; or more especially a kind of fiction that openly comments on its own fictional status. • Atonement draws attention to its own construction as a fictional narrative because such an awareness is crucial to its ’truths’ about the human condition.
Metafiction in Atonement • Part Three (p.312): • Cyril Connolly’s letter is an odd interpolation in the narrative – the first time the novel turns on itself, creating a sense of dislocation that makes us pause to reflect on the process of writing and the whole artificial construct: a product of drafting and redrafting, criticism and adaptation. His recommendation for an ‘underlying pull of simple narrative’ is already there in the vase episode, because Briony’s observation of it does now lead somewhere.
Paired narrative scenes #1 • Atonement Part One Ch.7 (p.72-77): • ‘The island temple…’ to ‘… until events, real events, not her own fantasies, rose to her challenge, and dispelled her insignificance.’ • Life of Pi DVD chapters 4 – 6 (0h14m20sto 0h25m10s): • From Pi’s account of how he found Christ at age 12, to the after-effects of his father’s cruel lesson in a tiger’s true nature with Richard Parker.
Paired narrative scenes #1 Atonement Part One (Ch.7, p.72-77): • McEwan sets the scene for Briony’s first shocking discovery (Robbie’s explicit love letter to Cecilia) of an adult world of experience for which she has been yearning by placing her symbolically on a bridge, between the corrupted past glory of a faux landed gentry, epitomized by the temple folly, and her family home. • “Flaying the nettles was becoming a self-purification, and it was childhood she set about now, having no further need for it.”
Paired narrative scenes #1 Life of Pi DVD chapters 4 – 6 (0h14m20sto 0h25m10s): • Pi’s childhood imagination embraces the wonder and hope of the great faiths, incorporating the monotheisms of Christianity and Islam into the pantheism of the Hindu faith. But his father’s rationalist scepticism destroys Pi’s innocence with a lesson in experience of nature’s raw instinctual cruelty. • “Faith is a house with may rooms … [but] doubt is useful. After all, you cannot know the strength of your faith until it’s been tested.”
Paired narrative scenes #2 • Atonement Part I, Ch.14 (p. 176 – 187): • ‘Word came down that Lola, sedated by the doctor, was at last asleep…’ to ‘…and finally vanished into the whiteness.’ • Life of Pi DVD chapters 13 – 17 (0h54m57sto 1h10m32s): • From Pi’s SOS in a can, through consulting the Survival at Seahandbook to the Blue Whale upsetting his raft full of the lifeboat’s provisions.
Paired narrative scenes #2 AtonementPart I, Ch.14 (p. 173 – 187): • Briony’s key role in the tragedy of Robbie’s arrest is ironically played out from her naïve perspective, believing in “a joyful feeling of blameless self-love” that everything she does is directed at saving her sister Cecilia. The blank whiteness that ends the chapter and part one of the novel becomes the task of her adult life: to fill it with a truer story atoning for the lies she ingenuously committed here. • “Cecilia remained where she was, facing down the drive, tranquilly watching the car as it receded, but the tremors along the line of her shoulders confided she was crying, and Briony knew she had never loved her sister more than now.”
Paired narrative scenes #2 Life of Pi DVD chapters 13 – 17 (0h54m57sto 1h10m32s): • Pi’s first rational attempts at survival on the open ocean with a Bengal tiger are thwarted in increasingly derisory ways, from the pathetic message-in-a-bottle, through Richard Parker’s urination on his circus act to the blue whale’s sublime destruction of his life raft. In the process, Pi commits his first act of murderous violence for which he seeks to atone with prayer. • “Thank you Lord Vishnu. Thank you for coming in the form of a fish to save our lives…”
Paired narrative scenes #3 • Atonement Part II (p.226 – 234): • ‘The road no longer had the protection of the plane trees’ to ‘That was the lasting damage.’ • Life of Pi DVD chapters 19 – 21 (1h17m25sto 1h22m55s): • From Pi’s acknowledgement that Richard Parker gives his life purpose to his hallucination of the Tsimtsumon the ocean floor .
Paired narrative scenes #3 AtonementPart II (p.226 – 234): • . • “.”
Paired narrative scenes #3 Life of Pi DVD chapters 19 – 21 (1h17m25s to 1h22m55s): • Hope; reflecting on events; ‘words are all I have to hold onto”; writing as a means of survival. • “”
Paired narrative scenes #4 • AtonementLondon, 1999 (p. 369-372): • ‘Now it is five in the morning…’ to ‘But now I must sleep.’ • Life of Pi DVD chapters 26 – 27 (1h45m15sto 1h55m10s): • The closing scenes of Pi telling the writer his alternative account of surviving at sea that he gave the Japanese insurance investigators in Mexico.
Paired narrative scenes #4 • Atonement London, 1999 (p. 369-372): • Being god brings no atonement. • “No atonement for God, or novelists, even if they are atheists. It was always an impossible task, and that was precisely the point. The attempt was all.”
Paired narrative scenes #4 • Life of Pi DVD chapters 26 – 27 (1h45m15sto 1h55m10s): • . • “The one with the tiger, that’s the better story” … “And so it goes with God.”
Against Oblivion • No late twentieth century text can subscribe to the simplified wish fulfilments of classic realist fiction. ’The development of nuclear weapons,’ McEwan has said, ’shows the dissociation of science from feelings,’ of outer and inner worlds we inhabit. • Interview with John Haffenden (1985), quoted in Brian Finney’s essay “Briony’s Stand Against Oblivion: Ian McEwan’s Atonement“ (2002)
Against Oblivion – Atonement • World War Two, that introduced the world to mass ethnic cleansing, the Cold War and the permanent threat of nuclear deterrence, appears to have brought forth mainly aesthetic structures that reflect the complexity and horror of life in the second half of that century. It is a time in history when the Marshalls, who, equally guilty, lack Briony’s conscience, use the War to make their fortune and are then treated as public benefactors. Compared to Briony, they “have no remorse, no need for atonement“ (McEwan, 2002 interview). • Briony’s Stand Against Oblivion: Ian McEwan’s Atonement, Brian Finney (2002) • http://www.csulb.edu/~bhfinney/McEwan.html
Against Oblivion – Atonement • Atonement ends not just with the revelation of the deaths of Robbie and Cecilia, but with the diagnosis of Briony’s vascular dementia and her refusal to have the lovers forgive her even in her fictional account of their survival - proof that in her literary act of atonement Briony has finally learned how to imagine herself into the feelings of others. Responding to the criticism that his endings are too pessimistic, McEwan has said, “I never did trust those novels where, for all their dark insights, or that they ended in a funeral, there was always someone walking away and bending to pick up a flower“ (2001 interview). • Briony’s Stand Against Oblivion: Ian McEwan’s Atonement, Brian Finney (2002) • http://www.csulb.edu/~bhfinney/McEwan.html
Yet, as McEwan admits, Part Three “has about it both an act of cowardice [. . .] but also it’s her stand against oblivion she’s seventy seven years old, her tide is running out very fast [. . .] She does not have the courage of her pessimism. [. . .] She knows that when this novel is finally published [. . .] she herself will only become a character“ (McEwan, Silverblatt). • Briony’s Stand Against Oblivion: Ian McEwan’s Atonement, Brian Finney (2002) • http://www.csulb.edu/~bhfinney/McEwan.html
Is Briony’s work of fiction an evasion or an act of atonement or both? What exactly does she mean when she says that atonement “was always an impossible task, and that was precisely the point” (351)? Is she implicitly recognizing the contradiction at the heart of her narrative – the impossibility of avoiding constructing false fictions around others at the same time as one is required to enter imaginatively into their lives? • Briony’s Stand Against Oblivion: Ian McEwan’s Atonement, Brian Finney (2002) • http://www.csulb.edu/~bhfinney/McEwan.html
Or is McEwan suggesting that the attempt is all we can ask for, an attempt that is bound to fail, but that can come closer to or stray further from the reality of others? Robbie’s and Cecilia’s happiness cannot be restored to them by an act of corrective fiction. • Briony’s Stand Against Oblivion: Ian McEwan’s Atonement, Brian Finney (2002) • http://www.csulb.edu/~bhfinney/McEwan.html