1 / 8

Academic Enrichment Model

Academic Enrichment Model. Karla Robles Anahi Godinez Melissa Trujillo Gary Trujillo. Academic Enrichment Model. Pre-Program Evaluation. Post Program Evaluation. Pre-Program Evaluation. Post Program Evaluation.

marlon
Download Presentation

Academic Enrichment Model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Academic Enrichment Model Karla Robles Anahi Godinez Melissa Trujillo Gary Trujillo

  2. Academic Enrichment Model Pre-Program Evaluation Post Program Evaluation Pre-Program Evaluation Post Program Evaluation Based on national/international college readiness standards – Customized curriculum not within community college framework Continued through the 10th Grade

  3. Components • Curriculum - not within CC framework • Based on national/international college readiness standards (i.e. ACT College Readiness Standards) • Reading, Writing, Math & Science – skills & concepts • Customized Curriculum • Assessments & Tracking – Full time evaluator/researcher? • Pre and Post Courses – measure progress • Pre and Post Program - overall program progress (PSAT paid by JR ACE) • National/International benchmarks (i.e. Explore, PLAN) • Cohort by year tracking • Retention Activities – Partnerships • Year round College Readiness Factors • “How to” steps • Parental Involvement (incorporate in curriculum) • On-site higher education visit • Mentoring (optional) • Career Exploration (optional)

  4. Delivery Method • Summer Institute with Year Round retention activities • Deliver Academic Components – summer • Deliver College Readiness Components – year round • Community Organization vs. In-House • Academic Year Institute • Deliver Academic Components • Retention scattered throughout Institute

  5. Strategies – Academic Year • Case Management Monitored by JR ACE staff • School District Involvement • Middle School & High School • Monitor academic progress through counselors & teachers • Question? Share Pre and Post assessments with school • Question? Academic Record Access Issues • Parent Involvement • Collaborate with parents to monitor academic progress • School District & Parent Involvement • Combination • JR ACE not privy to Information that Parents are • Partner with parent to monitor academic progress

  6. Partners • School Districts • Middle School & High School • Teachers/Counselors • Parent • Community Organizations • Retention activities • Organizations focused on developing college bound skills for middle and high school students • Non-academic factors – academic year?

  7. Key Points • Model teaches to a “college readiness” curriculum rather than individual state standards • Template model • Assessments Methodology • JR ACE • Pre-program – to place in appropriate course • Remedial to Advanced • Post-program – measure JR ACE academic impact • Goal – all students, at minimum, meet national college readiness grade standard • National Benchmarks • Measure student progress over time • Ensure students are competitive nationally

  8. Questions??? • Access to student academic records • Program Teachers • Community College Professors? • Recruit outside teacher? • School districts • Community Organizations • TFA • Retention Activities • JR ACE Staff? • Community Organization? • Location?

More Related