1 / 21

FDA recommendation: people should consume less than 65 grams of fat per day.

Theory of Consumer Behavior. “well-being” or “satisfaction”. Goal of Consumers: maximize utility. FDA recommendation: people should consume less than 65 grams of fat per day.

marnie
Download Presentation

FDA recommendation: people should consume less than 65 grams of fat per day.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Theory of Consumer Behavior “well-being” or “satisfaction” Goal of Consumers: maximize utility FDA recommendation: people should consume less than 65 grams of fat per day. Consumers’ problem: Choose diet to maximize utility subject to the budget constraint of 65 fat grams (ignore other costs) Utility maximization requires (prove later): Marginal utility—the utility from an additional Latte In this example, the price equals the number of grams of fat.

  2. additional pleasure per gram must be the same for everything we eat, i.e, foods that contain twice the amount of fat must give us twice the amount of pleasure. In October, a portion of the sales of Pink Ribbon Bagels (with dried cherries and cranberries) go to benefit breast cancer charities. Versus Only the Cinnamon Crunch has more fat (8 grams)! Pink Ribbon Blueberry 7 grams 2 grams Do I enjoy pink ribbons more than 3 times as much as blueberries currently? NO. Hence, I’m not maximizing my utility by eating pink ribbons every morning. .

  3. Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility—as more and more blueberry bagels are consumed, the marginal utility of eating blueberry bagels must eventually fall. works in both direction… Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility—as fewer pink ribbon bagels are consumed, the marginal utility of eating pink ribbon bagels rises. Hence, I’ll probably have a pink ribbon bagel occasionally but not every morning.

  4. Grande Chocolate Chip Frappucino = = 580 Calories 6” Chicken & Bacon Ranch Sub = 580 Calories Models assume consumers act “as if” > < or = = On July 1st 2008, the New York Board of Health required chain restaurants to put calories on menu boards.

  5. Russ sets aside $420 (Y) for tutoring (T) and fitness training (F) each year. PT =$14 per hour PF =$21 per hour Equation for the budget constraint: => Horizontal intercept:

  6. Fitness Training (hours per year) Tutoring (hours per year)

  7. Russ’s budget constraint shows his consumption options between fitness training and tutoring given his income (Y) and their prices (PF and PT). How do we show Russ’s preferences? Russ’s indifferencecurves show all the combinations of fitness training and tutoring that yield the same level of utility or well-being, i.e. Russ is indifferent between all the combinations along a given indifference curve.

  8. Fitness Training (hours per year) Indifference curve Tutoring (hours per year) Slope = MRS = MUT/MUF Indifference curves are negatively-sloped and usually convex to the origin due to diminishing marginal utility.

  9. Fitness Training (hours per year) Tutoring (hours per year)

  10. Fitness Training (hours per year) F A E B Tutoring (hours per year) What combination should Russ choose to maximize his utility?

  11. Fitness Training (hours per year) F A E B Tutoring (hours per year) Point F is on a high indifference curve but Russ cannot afford that combination, so we should ignore that combination.

  12. Fitness Training (hours per year) A E B Tutoring (hours per year) Points A, B, and E are on the budget constraint. Which maximizes Russ’s utility? Point E, where the indifference curve is just tangent to the budget constraint.

  13. Fitness Training (hours per year) A E B Tutoring (hours per year) At point E, MRS = slope of the budget constraint = PT/PF. At point A, |MRS| > PT/PF, which implies that MUT/PT > MUF/PF. Russ should increase tutoring (↓ MUT) and decrease fitness training (↑ MUF) by moving down his budget constraint to point E. At point B, |MRS| < PT/PF, which implies that MUT/PT < MUF/PF. Russ should decrease tutoring (↑MUT) and increase fitness training (↓ MUF) by moving up his budget constraint to point E.

  14. Suppose Harvard subsidies tutoring, but makes it unlimited… PT=$7 per hour PF =$21 per hour Equation for the budget constraint: => Horizontal intercept:

  15. Fitness Training (hours per year) Tutoring (hours per year)

  16. Effect of Price Change • Substitution effect: the lower price of tutoring makes causes Russ to substitute tutoring for fitness training to make MUT/PT once again equal to MUF/PF. • Income effect: the lower price of tutoring increases Russ’s real income so he can afford to purchase more both goods.

  17. Fitness Training (hours per year) B Income effect A S Substitution effect Tutoring (hours per year) Substitution effect Income effect

  18. Suppose Harvard subsidies … but only the first 10 hours

  19. Physical Training (hours per semester) Tutoring (hours per semester)

  20. Physical Training (hours per semester) Tutoring (hours per semester)

More Related