1 / 64

TGaz Next Generation Positioning Nov. Meeting Agenda

TGaz Next Generation Positioning Nov. Meeting Agenda. Authors:. Date: 2016-11-10. IEEE 802.11 Task Group AZ Next Generation Positioning. San Antonio, Tx Nov. 6 th -11 th , 2016 Chair: Jonathan Segev (Intel ) Vice-chair: Carlos Aldana (Intel)

martac
Download Presentation

TGaz Next Generation Positioning Nov. Meeting Agenda

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TGaz Next Generation Positioning Nov. Meeting Agenda Authors: • Date:2016-11-10 Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  2. IEEE 802.11Task Group AZNext Generation Positioning San Antonio, Tx Nov. 6th-11th, 2016 Chair: Jonathan Segev (Intel) Vice-chair: Carlos Aldana (Intel) Secretary (stand-in) : Naveen Kakani (Qualcomm) Technical Editor: Chao Chun Wang (MediaTek) Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  3. Abstract • This presentation contains the IEEE 802.11 TGaz Next Generation Positioning agenda for the Nov. San Antonio meeting. Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  4. Attendance, Voting & Document Status • Make sure your badges are correct • Please announce your affiliation when you first address the group during a meeting slot • If you plan to make a submission be sure it does not contain company logos or advertising • Questions on Voting status, Ballot pool, Access to Reflector, Documentation, member’s area • see Jon Rosdahl – jrosdahl@ieee.org • Cell Phones Silent or Off Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  5. Logistics • Attendance: • https://imat.ieee.org • You must register before logging attendance. • You must log attendance during each 2 hour session. • Documentation • https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/documents • Use “TGaz” folder for documents relating to the TGaz activity. Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  6. Patent Policy • Following 5 slides Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  7. Instructions for the WG Chair The IEEE-SA strongly recommends that at each WG meeting the chair or a designee: • Show slides #1 through #4 of this presentation • Advise the WG attendees that: • The IEEE’s patent policy is described in Clause 6 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws; • Early identification of patent claims which maybe essential for the use of standards under development is strongly encouraged; • There maybe Essential Patent Claims of which the IEEE is not aware. Additionally, neither the IEEE, the WG, nor the WG chair can ensure the accuracy or completeness of any assurance or whether any such assurance is, in fact, of a Patent Claim that is essential for the use of the standard under development. • Instruct the WG Secretary to record in the minutes of the relevant WG meeting: • That the foregoing information was provided and that slides 1 through 4 (and this slide 0, if applicable) were shown; • That the chair or designee provided an opportunity for participants to identify patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) of which the participant is personally aware and that maybe essential for the use of that standard • Any responses that were given, specifically the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) that were identified (if any) and by whom. • The WG Chair shall ensure that a request is made to any identified holders of potential essential patent claim(s) to complete and submit a Letter of Assurance. • It is recommended that the WG chair review the guidance in IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual 6.3.5 and in FAQs 14 and 15 on inclusion of potential Essential Patent Claims by incorporation or by reference. Note: WG includes Working Groups, Task Groups, and other standards-developing committees with a PAR approved by the IEEE-SA Standards Board. Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  8. Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform • All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. • Participants [Note: Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2]: • “Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents • “Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents) • The above does not apply if the patent claim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group • Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged • No duty to perform a patent search Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  9. Patent Related Links • All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development. • Patent Policy is stated in these sources: • IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws • http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6 • IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual • http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/opman/sect6.html#6.3 • Material about the patent policy is available at • http://standards.ieee.org/about/sasb/patcom/materials.html If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at patcom@ieee.org or visit http://standards.ieee.org/about/sasb/patcom/index.html This slide set is available at https://development.standards.ieee.org/myproject/Public/mytools/mob/slideset.ppt Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  10. Call for Potentially Essential Patents • If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance: • Either speak up now or • Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or • Cause an LOA to be submitted Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  11. Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings • All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. • Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. • Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. • Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches maybe discussed in standards development meetings. • Technical considerations remain primary focus • Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. • Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. • Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object. --------------------------------------------------------------- See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause 5.3.10 and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details. Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  12. TGaz Schedule at a glance Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  13. Agenda for the Week • Patent policy • Approve previous meeting minutes (11-16-1320r0). • Review and response to 3GPP RAN4 liaison (11-16-1338). • Presentations to inform the TG: • Submissions towards FRD text. • Submissions towards SRD text. • Supportive technical submissions to inform the TG. • Schedule teleconference times as needed. Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  14. Submission List for the week Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  15. Meeting Slot #1 Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  16. Meeting Slot # 1 discussion items • Call Meeting to Order (1 min) • Patent Policy and Logistics (7 min) • Last call for Submission (2 min) • Agenda Setting (10 min) • Approval of previous meeting minutes (5min) • Review and response to 3GPP RAN4 liaison. • Presentations to inform the group (as time permits). Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  17. Submission order – Slot 1 Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  18. Approval of previous meeting minutes • Document 11-16/1320r0 “802.11az Meeting Minutes September 2016 Session” posted to Mentor on Sep. 29th. • Motion: • To approve document 11-16/1320r0 as TG meeting minutes for the Sep. meeting. • Moved by: Ganesh Venkatesan • Seconded by: Chao Chun Wang • Results (Y/N/A): 14 / 0 / 0 • Motion passes. Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  19. Presentations Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  20. Attendance reminder Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  21. Recess Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  22. Meeting Slot #2 Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  23. Meeting Slot # 2 discussion items • Call Meeting to Order (1min) • Patent Policy and Logistics (5min) • Agenda Setting (4min) • Presentations to inform the TG (as time permits) • Continue 3GPP RAN4 Liaison Response on RTT measurement accuracy – moved to Thursday AM1 timeslot. Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  24. Submission order – Slot 2 Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  25. Presentations Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  26. Motion on Submission 1496 • Motion: • Move to adopt the following spec frame work requirement: • “11az protocol negotiation phase shall define an enhancement to the FTM Request frame in both SU and MU modes for both associated and unassociated states”, and instruct the SFD editor to include it in the TGazSFD for the .11az Ranging protocol, and allow editing rights to the editor. • Moved: Ganesh Venkatesan • Seconded: SK Yong • Result: • Y: 13 N: 0 A: 5 motion passes. Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  27. Reminder to do attendance Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  28. Recess Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  29. Meeting Slot #3 Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  30. Meeting Slot # 3 discussion items • Call Meeting to Order (1min) • Patent Policy and Logistics (5min) • Agenda Setting (4min) • Continue 3GPP RAN4 Liaison Response on RTT measurement accuracy. • Presentations to inform the TG (as time permits) Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  31. Submission order – Slot 3 Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  32. Presentations Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  33. Strawpoll • For the 1st and 2nd questions, which options do you support? • (1) Indicate the IEEE spec does not include minimum performance level and performance is market derived. • (2) Ask the 3GPP to define the channel condition under which they would like to receive performance level for. Individual contributors present result. • (3) Select scenarios and channel conditions and do the analysis. • (4) We provide the supported protocol ranges (protocol analysis). • (5) Report the values used as reference for TGaz establishment/early implementation. • Results: • O1) 8 O2) 0 O3) 0 O4) 2 O5) 5 Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  34. Strawpoll • For the 1st and 2nd questions, we agree to: • Indicate the IEEE spec does not include minimum performance level and performance is market derived, in addition to that report the values used and references presented in TGaz and its establishment/early implementation. • Results: • Y/N/A: 11/0/0 Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  35. Reminder to do attendance Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  36. Recess Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  37. Meeting Slot #4 Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  38. Meeting Slot # 4discussion items • Call Meeting to Order (1min) • Patent Policy and Logistics (5min) • Agenda Setting (4min) • Complete and motion discussion on liaison response to3GPP. • Presentations to inform the TG (as time permits) • Timeline and project progress review (10min) – As needed • Telecon time setting (5min) Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  39. Submission order – Slot 4 Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  40. Motion to Release Liaison • Motion • Approve document 11-16-1535-02-00az-response-to-RAN4-liaison-on-RTT-accuracy.doc as the IEEE 802.11 response to 3GPP RAN 4 request for RTT accuracy, and grant the 802.11 chair editorial license. • Moved: Allan Zhu • 2nd: Chittabrata Ghosh • Y/N/A: 14/ 0 / 3 • Motion passes. Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  41. Presentations Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  42. Activity timelines post the July meeting 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 .11azDraft 2.0(Mar 2018) .11azDraft 1.0(Sep. 2017) SG Formation 1-15 TG formation 9-15 .11az Final (May. 2020) .11az SFD 5-2016 UCD SFD feature Freeze FRD 11/15-5/16 5/15-11/15 11az SFD 5/16-9/17 Amendment text FRD Freeze FRD/tech approach Accuracy coverage Spec. frame work TG Timelines Pending Review Amendment text development 60Ghz FRD/tech approach Spec. frame work Amendment text development Scalability FRD/tech approach Spec. frame work Amendment text development Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  43. Goals for the January Meeting • Continue on Functional Requirement Document development. • Approve submissions of technical material towards SFD text. • Review technical submissions on channel models, proposed technical approaches etc. Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  44. Teleconference Schedule • Nov. 30th (Wed.) 10:00AM ET for 1hr. • Do we need anymore calls? Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  45. Reminder to do attendance Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  46. AOB? Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  47. Adjourn Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  48. Backup Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  49. Previously: Review TGaz Timeline progress (Nov.) 2015 2016 2018 2020 2017 2019 PAR Approved (Sep. 2015) We are here NGP SG Launch (Jan. 2015) TG formation meeting (Sep. 2015) .11azDraft 1.0(Sep. 2017) .11azDraft 2.0(Mar 2018) .11az Final (May. 2020) Amendment text FRD UCD 11az SFD Spec Frame work (July16 – July17) UC doc. (July15 – Nov. 17) Amendment text (Mar 17 – July20) Func. Req. Doc. (Nov 15 - July16) Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

  50. Historical timelines data Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

More Related